School of Sport and Exercise Science, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Learning (ISEAL), Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;34(9):800-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1331197. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
The effects of high-intensity, short-duration, re-warm-ups on team-sport-related performance were investigated. In a randomised, cross-over study, participants performed 2×26-min periods of an intermittent activity protocol (IAP) on a non-motorized treadmill, interspersed by 15-min of passive recovery (CON); 3-min small-sided game (SSG); or a 5RM leg-press. Measures included counter-movement jump, repeated-sprint, the Loughborough soccer passing test (LSPT), blood lactate concentration, heart-rate, and perceptual measures. Data were analyzed using effect size (90% confidence intervals), and percentage change; determining magnitudes of effects. A 5RM re-warm-up improved flight-time to contraction-time ratio when compared to SSG (9.8%, ES; 0.5±0.3) and CON (ES: 9.4%, 0.7±0.5) re-warm-ups, remaining higher following the second IAP (8.8%, ES; 0.5±0.3 and 10.2%, ES; 0.6±0.6, respectively). Relative-maximum rate-of-force development was greater in the 5RM condition following the second IAP compared to SSG (29.3%, ES; 0.7±0.5) and CON (16.2%, ES; 0.6±0.6). Repeated-sprint ability during the second IAP improved in the 5RM re-warm-up; peak velocity, mean velocity, and acceleration were 4, 3, and 18% greater, respectively. Within groups, the SSG re-warm-up improved LSPT performance post-intervention; 6.4% (ES: 0.6±0.8) and following the second IAP 6.2% (ES: 0.6±0.6), compared to pre-intervention. A 5RM leg-press re-warm-up improved physical performance, while a SSG re-warm-up enhanced skill execution following standardized intermittent exercise.
研究了高强度、短时间、重新热身对团队运动相关表现的影响。在一项随机交叉研究中,参与者在非动力跑步机上进行了 2 次 26 分钟的间歇活动方案(IAP),中间穿插 15 分钟的被动恢复(CON);3 分钟的小型团体游戏(SSG);或 5 次腿部压力重复。测量包括反跳、重复冲刺、拉夫堡足球传球测试(LSPT)、血乳酸浓度、心率和知觉测量。使用效应大小(90%置信区间)和百分比变化分析数据;确定影响的大小。与 SSG(9.8%,ES;0.5±0.3)和 CON(ES:9.4%,0.7±0.5)相比,5RM 热身提高了收缩时间比的飞行时间,在第二次 IAP 后仍然更高(8.8%,ES;0.5±0.3 和 10.2%,ES;0.6±0.6)。第二次 IAP 后,5RM 条件下的最大相对力量发展速度大于 SSG(29.3%,ES;0.7±0.5)和 CON(16.2%,ES;0.6±0.6)。第二次 IAP 期间,5RM 热身组的重复冲刺能力提高,峰值速度、平均速度和加速度分别提高了 4%、3%和 18%。在组内,SSG 热身在干预后提高了 LSPT 表现;分别提高了 6.4%(ES:0.6±0.8)和第二次 IAP 后 6.2%(ES:0.6±0.6),与干预前相比。5RM 腿部压力重复热身提高了身体表现,而 SSG 热身提高了标准化间歇运动后的技能执行。