South American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Faculty of Dentistry, Research Department, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jan 12;12(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01526-x.
A psychometric study of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES III) has been conducted in Spanish-speaking countries from the perspective of the classical test theory. However, this approach has limitations that affect the psychometric understanding of this scale.
Accordingly, this study used the item response theory to investigate the psychometric performance of the items. Furthermore, it evaluated the differential performance of the items for Colombia and Chile.
For this purpose, 518 health science students from both countries participated. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used.
The study results revealed that the cohesion and adaptability items presented adequate discrimination and difficulty indices. In addition, items 5, 8, 13, 17, and 19 of cohesion indicated differential functioning between students from both countries, with Chilean students exhibiting a greater discriminatory power. Further, the Colombian group exhibited a greater discriminatory power for item 18 of adaptability.
The study concluded that the items of FACES III indicated adequate psychometric performance in terms of their discriminative capacity and difficulty in Chile and Colombia.
从经典测试理论的角度出发,已经在西班牙语国家进行了家庭适应性和凝聚力量表(FACES III)的心理计量学研究。然而,这种方法存在局限性,会影响对该量表的心理计量学理解。
因此,本研究使用项目反应理论来研究项目的心理计量性能。此外,还评估了项目在哥伦比亚和智利的差异表现。
为此,两国的 518 名健康科学专业学生参与了研究。采用验证性因子分析。
研究结果表明,凝聚力和适应性项目具有适当的区分度和难度指数。此外,凝聚力的第 5、8、13、17 和 19 项表明两国学生的功能差异,智利学生表现出更大的区分能力。此外,哥伦比亚组在适应性项目 18 上表现出更大的区分能力。
研究表明,在智利和哥伦比亚,FACES III 的项目在其区分能力和难度方面表现出适当的心理计量性能。