Suppr超能文献

3 种单支注射器水基根管封闭剂的物理性能评价与表征

Characterization and Assessment of Physical Properties of 3 Single Syringe Hydraulic Cement-based Sealers.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

School of Dentistry, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Endod. 2024 Mar;50(3):381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A number of sealers with different chemistries are badged as Bioceramic, implying biological activity, but have dissimilar properties, which has implications on the sealer properties and will affect the quality and outcome of root canal treatment. This study aimed to assess the physical and chemical properties of 3 hydraulic cement-based sealers, namely BC Universal sealer compared with Totalfill BC sealer and AH Plus Bioceramic.

METHODS

The microstructure and composition of the sealers were assessed using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy after setting. The crystalline phases were assessed by X-ray diffraction analysis and the leachates were tested using inductively coupled plasma. All testing was performed at 0, 7, and 28 days. The physical properties of film thickness, flow, radiopacity, and solubility were evaluated using ISO 6876:2012 standards.

RESULTS

All 3 sealers contained calcium, zirconium, and silicon. Totalfill BC had the highest calcium release at 7 and 28 days followed by AH Plus Bioceramic and BC Universal sealer. All 3 sealers adhered to the ISO standard in terms of flow and radiopacity. BC Universal sealer was slightly over the range (>50 μm) for film thickness. All sealers exceeded the solubility range set by ISO 6876:2012.

CONCLUSION

Although these hydraulic cement sealers had similar components and delivery, the properties varied significantly. The testing of material properties to confirm the suitability for clinical use is necessary.

摘要

简介

许多具有不同化学成分的密封剂被标记为生物陶瓷,暗示具有生物活性,但具有不同的特性,这对密封剂的特性有影响,并将影响根管治疗的质量和结果。本研究旨在评估 3 种水硬性水泥基密封剂的物理和化学性质,即 BC Universal 密封剂与 Totalfill BC 密封剂和 AH Plus Bioceramic 的比较。

方法

使用扫描电子显微镜和能量色散光谱法评估密封剂的微观结构和成分,在凝固后进行。通过 X 射线衍射分析评估晶体相,通过电感耦合等离子体测试浸出物。所有测试均在 0、7 和 28 天进行。使用 ISO 6876:2012 标准评估膜厚度、流动、射线不透性和溶解度的物理性能。

结果

所有 3 种密封剂均含有钙、锆和硅。Totalfill BC 在 7 天和 28 天的钙释放量最高,其次是 AH Plus Bioceramic 和 BC Universal 密封剂。所有 3 种密封剂在流动和射线不透性方面均符合 ISO 标准。BC Universal 密封剂的膜厚度略高于(>50μm)范围。所有密封剂的溶解度均超过 ISO 6876:2012 规定的范围。

结论

尽管这些水硬性水泥密封剂具有相似的成分和输送方式,但性能差异很大。有必要对材料性能进行测试,以确认其临床适用性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验