Puckett C L, Hurvitz J S, Metzler M H, Silver D
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979 Sep;64(3):361-5. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197909000-00013.
Three groups of dogs were studied to compare the bone formation obtained with traditional bone grafting techniques, and that obtained with revascularized periosteum or revascularized bone grafts--all in unstressed bone. Revascularized periosteum did not produce a significant amount of bone in this unstressed model. At 4 months the revascularized rib grafts had a slightly greater tolerance to stress at the callus site than traditional bone grafts, but the incidence of non-union was the same. We conclude that the use of revascularized bone grafts should be reserved for situations in which traditional bone grafting techniques are unlikely to be successful.
研究了三组犬，以比较传统骨移植技术、带血运的骨膜或带血运的骨移植所获得的骨形成情况——所有这些均在无应力的骨中进行。在这个无应力模型中，带血运的骨膜未产生大量的骨。在4个月时，带血运的肋骨移植在骨痂部位对应力的耐受性略高于传统骨移植，但骨不连的发生率相同。我们得出结论，带血运的骨移植应保留用于传统骨移植技术不太可能成功的情况。
