Suppr超能文献

碳定价并非不公平。

Carbon Pricing is not Unjust.

作者信息

Mintz-Woo Kian

机构信息

Department of Philosophy & Environmental Research Institute University College Cork Cork T12 Y1F1 Ireland.

Equity and Justice Group International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Laxenburg A-2361 Austria.

出版信息

Glob Chall. 2023 Dec 10;8(1):2300089. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202300089. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

The aim of this perspective is to argue that carbon pricing is not unjust. Two important dimensions of justice are distributive and procedural (sometimes called "participatory") justice. In terms of distributive justice, it is argued that carbon pricing can be made distributionally just through revenue recycling and that it should be expected that even neutral reductions in emissions will generate progressive benefits, both internationally and regionally. In terms of procedural justice, it is argued that carbon pricing is in principle compatible with any procedure; however, there is also a particular morally justifiable procedure, the Citizens' Assembly, which has been implemented in Ireland on this precise question and has generated broad agreement on carbon pricing. It is suggested that this morally matters because such groups are like "ideal advisors" that offer morally important advice. Finally, an independent objection is offered to some ambitious alternatives to carbon pricing like Green New Deal-type frameworks, frameworks that aim to simultaneously tackle multiple social challenges. The objection is that these will take too long to work in a climate context, both to develop and to iterate.

摘要

本文观点旨在论证碳定价并非不公正。正义有两个重要维度,即分配正义和程序正义(有时也称为“参与性正义”)。就分配正义而言,有人认为碳定价可通过收入循环实现分配公平,而且可以预期,即使是中性的减排措施,在国际和地区层面都将产生渐进式效益。就程序正义而言,有人认为碳定价原则上与任何程序都兼容;然而,还有一种特别符合道德的程序,即公民大会,爱尔兰已就这一确切问题实施了该程序,并就碳定价达成了广泛共识。有人认为这在道德层面很重要,因为这类群体就像“理想顾问”,能提供具有道德重要性的建议。最后,针对碳定价的一些雄心勃勃的替代方案,如绿色新政式框架(旨在同时应对多重社会挑战的框架),提出了一个独立的反对意见。反对意见是,在气候背景下,这些方案无论是制定还是迭代,都需要太长时间才能发挥作用。

相似文献

1
Carbon Pricing is not Unjust.碳定价并非不公平。
Glob Chall. 2023 Dec 10;8(1):2300089. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202300089. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
5
Empowering Energy Justice.赋予能源公平性权力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 21;13(9):926. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090926.
6
7
Models of distributive justice.分配正义模型。
Novartis Found Symp. 2007;278:165-70; discussion 170-80, 216-21.

本文引用的文献

1
Collapse, social tipping dynamics, and framing climate change.崩溃、社会 tipping 动态与气候变化的框架构建
Polit Philos Econ. 2024 Aug;23(3):230-251. doi: 10.1177/1470594X231196432. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3
Environmental Justice and Carbon Pricing: Can They Be Reconciled?环境正义与碳定价:二者能否协调统一?
Glob Chall. 2023 Feb 28;7(4):2200204. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202200204. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Environmental Justice: Where It Has Been, and Where It Might Be Going.环境正义:过去的成就与未来的方向
Annu Rev Public Health. 2023 Apr 3;44:93-111. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071621-064925. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
6
Climate change and the threat to civilization.气候变化与对文明的威胁。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 18;119(42):e2210525119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210525119. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
7
Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios.气候终局:探索灾难性气候变化情景。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 23;119(34):e2108146119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108146119. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
8
Basic needs in normative contexts.规范语境中的基本需求。
Philos Compass. 2021 May;16(5):e12732. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12732. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
9
The Environment and Directed Technical Change.环境与定向技术变革
Am Econ Rev. 2012 Feb;102(1):131-166. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.1.131.
10
A practitioner's guide to successful coalitions.成功联盟从业者指南
Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Apr;29(2):173-91; discussion 205-11. doi: 10.1023/A:1010366310857.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验