• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACTIV-6 利益相关者咨询委员会:去中心化临床试验中虚拟参与的一个范例。

The ACTIV-6 Stakeholder Advisory Committee: a model for virtual engagement in decentralized clinical trials.

作者信息

Hamm Megan E, Arnold Jonathan, Denson Josh, Edwards Talethia, Merritt Greg, McCarthy Matthew, Nelson Danielle, Phillips Kirk T, Thicklin Florence, Vasey Andrew, McTigue Kathleen

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Environmental Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 20;7(1):e264. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.671. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2023.671
PMID:38229896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10789984/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Engaging patients, caregivers, and other stakeholders to help guide the research process is a cornerstone of patient-centered research. Lived expertise may help ensure the relevance of research questions, promote practices that are satisfactory to research participants, improve transparency, and assist with disseminating findings.

METHODS

Traditionally engagement has been conducted face-to-face in the local communities in which research operates. Decentralized platform trials pose new challenges for the practice of engagement. We used a remote model for stakeholder engagement, relying on Zoom meetings and blog communications.

RESULTS

Here we describe the approach used for research partnership with patients, caregivers, and clinicians in the planning and oversight of the ACTIV-6 trial and the impact of this work. We also present suggestions for future remote engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACTIV-6 experience may inform proposed strategies for future engagement in decentralized trials.

摘要

引言

让患者、护理人员和其他利益相关者参与进来,以帮助指导研究过程,是患者中心研究的基石。实际经验可能有助于确保研究问题的相关性,推广令研究参与者满意的做法,提高透明度,并协助传播研究结果。

方法

传统上,参与活动是在研究开展所在的当地社区面对面进行的。分散式平台试验给参与实践带来了新的挑战。我们采用了一种远程模式进行利益相关者参与,依靠Zoom会议和博客交流。

结果

在此,我们描述了在ACTIV-6试验的规划和监督中与患者、护理人员和临床医生建立研究伙伴关系所采用的方法以及这项工作的影响。我们还提出了未来远程参与的建议。

结论

ACTIV-6的经验可能为未来参与分散式试验的拟议策略提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eb3/10789984/dd0b1d9d4733/S2059866123006714_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eb3/10789984/dd0b1d9d4733/S2059866123006714_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eb3/10789984/dd0b1d9d4733/S2059866123006714_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The ACTIV-6 Stakeholder Advisory Committee: a model for virtual engagement in decentralized clinical trials.ACTIV-6 利益相关者咨询委员会:去中心化临床试验中虚拟参与的一个范例。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 20;7(1):e264. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.671. eCollection 2023.
2
Stakeholder engagement in eight comparative effectiveness trials in African Americans and Latinos with asthma.利益相关者参与针对非裔美国人和拉丁裔哮喘患者的八项比较疗效试验。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 24;8(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00399-x.
3
Stakeholder engagement to inform HIV clinical trials: a systematic review of the evidence.利益相关者参与以告知 HIV 临床试验:证据的系统评价。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Oct;21 Suppl 7(Suppl Suppl 7):e25174. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25174.
4
Evaluation of a stakeholder advisory board for an adolescent mental health randomized clinical trial.青少年心理健康随机临床试验的利益相关者咨询委员会评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 28;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00425-6.
5
A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.一项反映社区利益相关者不同观点的肺癌研究议程:SEED方法的过程与成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 11;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y. eCollection 2019.
6
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
Development and evaluation of a virtual patient-centered outcomes research training program for the cystic fibrosis community.针对囊性纤维化群体的虚拟以患者为中心的结局研究培训项目的开发与评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Dec 4;7(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00328-4.
8
Pragmatic Considerations in Incorporating Stakeholder Engagement Into a Palliative Care Transitions Study.将利益相关者参与纳入姑息治疗过渡研究的实用考虑因素。
Med Care. 2021 Aug 1;59(Suppl 4):S370-S378. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001583.
9
A Multilevel Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in the Formulation of a Clinical Data Research Network.多层次方法在临床数据研究网络制定中的利益相关者参与。
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S22-S26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000778.
10
Perceived Significance of Engagement in Research Prioritization Among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals: A Qualitative Study.慢性肾病患者、护理人员及医疗保健专业人员对参与研究优先级设定的认知重要性:一项定性研究
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Oct 19;5:2054358118807480. doi: 10.1177/2054358118807480. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Participant experiences in a decentralized clinical trial using digital health technologies: The ACTIV-6 study.使用数字健康技术的去中心化临床试验中的参与者体验:ACTIV-6研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 16;9(1):e121. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.69. eCollection 2025.
2
Participant-Centered Engagement for Sustained Adherence to Smartwatches: A 12-Month Prospective Decentralized Digital Health Study.以参与者为中心的智能手表持续依从性参与:一项为期12个月的前瞻性去中心化数字健康研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb;18(2):e70155. doi: 10.1111/cts.70155.
3
Engaging communities in therapeutics clinical research during pandemics: Experiences and lessons from the ACTIV COVID-19 therapeutics research initiative.

本文引用的文献

1
Lessons Learned with a Triad of Stakeholder Advisory Boards: Working with Adolescents, Mothers, and Clinicians to Design the TRUST Study.从三个利益相关者咨询委员会中吸取的经验教训:与青少年、母亲和临床医生合作设计TRUST研究。
Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;10(3):483. doi: 10.3390/children10030483.
2
Effect of Higher-Dose Ivermectin for 6 Days vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.6 天高剂量伊维菌素对比安慰剂对 COVID-19 门诊患者持续康复时间的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Mar 21;329(11):888-897. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1650.
3
Stakeholder engagement infrastructure to support multicenter research networks: Advances from the clinical research networks participating in PCORnet.
在大流行期间让社区参与治疗性临床研究:ACTIV COVID-19治疗研究倡议的经验与教训
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 15;8(1):e156. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.561. eCollection 2024.
4
Progress toward realizing the promise of decentralized clinical trials.实现去中心化临床试验前景的进展。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jan 14;8(1):e19. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.706. eCollection 2024.
5
ACTIV-6: Operationalizing a decentralized, outpatient randomized platform trial to evaluate efficacy of repurposed medicines for COVID-19.ACTIV-6:开展一项去中心化的门诊随机平台试验,以评估新冠病毒病(COVID-19)药物再利用的疗效。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 31;7(1):e221. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.644. eCollection 2023.
支持多中心研究网络的利益相关者参与基础设施:参与PCORnet的临床研究网络的进展
Learn Health Syst. 2022 May 12;7(1):e10313. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10313. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Effect of Fluvoxamine vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.氟伏沙明对比安慰剂对轻至中度 COVID-19 门诊患者持续康复时间的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Jan 24;329(4):296-305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.24100.
5
Effect of Ivermectin vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.伊维菌素对比安慰剂对轻至中度 COVID-19 门诊患者持续康复时间的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Oct 25;328(16):1595-1603. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18590.
6
Engaging Stakeholders in the Design and Conduct of Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementias.参与阿尔茨海默病和阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆症嵌入式实用临床试验的设计和实施。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S62-S67. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16630.
7
Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV): An Unprecedented Partnership for Unprecedented Times.加速COVID-19治疗干预和疫苗(ACTIV):应对前所未有的时代的前所未有的合作。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2455-2457. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8920.
8
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss: A PCORnet Cohort Study.减重手术的疗效和安全性比较:PCORnet 队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 4;169(11):741-750. doi: 10.7326/M17-2786. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
9
Stakeholder engagement to inform HIV clinical trials: a systematic review of the evidence.利益相关者参与以告知 HIV 临床试验:证据的系统评价。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Oct;21 Suppl 7(Suppl Suppl 7):e25174. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25174.
10
Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Patient-centered Research Agenda: Lessons Learned From the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet).让利益相关者参与制定以患者为中心的研究议程:从健康网络研究行动(REACHnet)中吸取的经验教训。
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S27-S32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000785.