Suppr超能文献

秋水仙碱治疗急性心肌梗死:1 年随访时的心血管事件。

Colchicine in acute myocardial infarction: cardiovascular events at 1-year follow up.

机构信息

Cardiology, University of Poitiers, Clinical Investigation Center (CIC) INSERM 1402, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.

Cardiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Clinical Investigation Center Inserm 1407, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2024 Jan 17;11(1):e002474. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002474.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the COVERT-MI randomised placebo-controlled trial, oral administration of high-dose colchicine at the time of reperfusion and for 5 days in acute ST-elevated myocardial infarction did not reduce infarct size but was associated with a significant increase in left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in comparison to placebo. We aimed to assess the 1-year clinical outcomes of the study population.

METHODS

This study is a follow-up analysis of the COVERT-MI study on prespecified secondary clinical endpoints at 1 year. The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including all-cause death, acute coronary syndromes, heart failure events, ischaemic strokes, sustained ventricular arrhythmias and acute kidney injury at 1-year follow-up. The quality of life (QOL) and the drug therapy prescription were also assessed.

RESULTS

At 1 year, 192 patients (101 patients in the colchicine group, 91 in the placebo group) were followed up. Seventy-six (39.6%) MACEs were reported in the study population. There was no significant difference regarding the number of MACEs between groups: 36 (35.6%) in the colchicine group and 40 (44.1%) in the placebo group (p=0.3). There were no differences in the occurrence of ischaemic strokes between the colchicine group and the control group (3 (3%) vs 2 (2.2%), respectively, p=0.99). There was a trend towards fewer heart failure events in the colchicine group compared with the placebo group (12 (11.9%) vs 18 (19.8%), p=0.20). There was no significant difference in QOL scores at 1 year (75.8±15.7 vs 72.7±16.2 respectively, p=0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between the colchicine and placebo groups at 1 year regarding MACEs, especially concerning deaths or ischaemic strokes. No excess of ischaemic adverse events was observed despite the initial increase in LVT in the colchicine group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT0315681.

摘要

目的

在 COVERT-MI 随机安慰剂对照试验中,在再灌注时和急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的 5 天内口服高剂量秋水仙碱并没有减少梗死面积,但与安慰剂相比,显著增加了左心室血栓形成(LVT)。我们旨在评估研究人群的 1 年临床结局。

方法

这是 COVERT-MI 研究的随访分析,对 1 年时的预设次要临床终点进行了分析。本研究的主要终点是 1 年随访时主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)的复合终点,包括全因死亡、急性冠脉综合征、心力衰竭事件、缺血性卒、持续性室性心律失常和急性肾损伤。还评估了生活质量(QOL)和药物治疗处方。

结果

在 1 年时,192 例患者(秋水仙碱组 101 例,安慰剂组 91 例)得到随访。研究人群中报告了 76 例(39.6%)MACEs。两组之间 MACEs 的数量没有显著差异:秋水仙碱组 36 例(35.6%),安慰剂组 40 例(44.1%)(p=0.3)。秋水仙碱组和对照组缺血性卒的发生率无差异(分别为 3(3%)和 2(2.2%),p=0.99)。秋水仙碱组心力衰竭事件的发生率较安慰剂组有下降趋势(12(11.9%)比 18(19.8%),p=0.20)。1 年时 QOL 评分无显著差异(分别为 75.8±15.7 和 72.7±16.2,p=0.18)。

结论

在 1 年时,秋水仙碱组和安慰剂组在 MACEs 方面没有显著差异,尤其是在死亡或缺血性卒方面。尽管秋水仙碱组的 LVT 最初增加,但未观察到缺血不良事件的增加。

临床试验注册号

NCT0315681。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ec8/10806482/8821b4c44b2f/openhrt-2023-002474f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验