体内磁共振引导聚焦超声消融治疗的声-热模拟评估。

Evaluation of acoustic-thermal simulations of in vivo magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound ablative therapy.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 2024;41(1):2301489. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2301489. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate numerical simulations of focused ultrasound (FUS) with a rabbit model, comparing simulated heating characteristics with magnetic resonance temperature imaging (MRTI) data collected during treatment.

METHODS

A rabbit model was treated with FUS sonications in the biceps femoris with 3D MRTI collected. Acoustic and thermal properties of the rabbit muscle were determined experimentally. Numerical models of the rabbits were created, and tissue-type-specific properties were assigned. FUS simulations were performed using both the hybrid angular spectrum (HAS) method and k-Wave. Simulated power deposition patterns were converted to temperature maps using a Pennes' bioheat equation-based thermal solver. Agreement of pressure between the simulation techniques and temperature between the simulation and experimental heating was evaluated. Contributions of scattering and absorption attenuation were considered.

RESULTS

Simulated peak pressures derived using the HAS method exceeded the simulated peak pressures from k-Wave by 1.6 ± 2.7%. The location and FWHM of the peak pressure calculated from HAS and k-Wave showed good agreement. When muscle acoustic absorption value in the simulations was adjusted to approximately 54% of the measured attenuation, the average root-mean-squared error between simulated and experimental spatial-average temperature profiles was 0.046 ± 0.019 °C/W. Mean distance between simulated and experimental COTMs was 3.25 ± 1.37 mm. Transverse FWHMs of simulated sonications were smaller than in sonications. Longitudinal FWHMs were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Presented results demonstrate agreement between HAS and k-Wave simulations and that FUS simulations can accurately predict focal position and heating for applications in soft tissue.

摘要

目的

评估兔模型中聚焦超声(FUS)的数值模拟,比较治疗过程中收集的模拟加热特性与磁共振温度成像(MRTI)数据。

方法

用 3D MRTI 对兔模型的二头肌进行 FUS 超声处理,并进行采集。通过实验确定兔肌肉的声和热特性。创建了兔的数值模型,并分配了组织类型特异性特性。使用混合角谱(HAS)方法和 k-Wave 进行 FUS 模拟。使用基于 Pennes 生物热方程的热解算器将模拟的功率沉积模式转换为温度图。评估了模拟技术之间的压力和模拟与实验加热之间的温度的一致性。考虑了散射和吸收衰减的影响。

结果

使用 HAS 方法得出的模拟峰值压力比 k-Wave 得出的模拟峰值压力高 1.6±2.7%。从 HAS 和 k-Wave 计算出的峰值压力的位置和 FWHM 吻合较好。当模拟中肌肉声吸收值调整到大约实测衰减的 54%时,模拟和实验空间平均温度分布之间的平均均方根误差为 0.046±0.019°C/W。模拟和实验 COTM 之间的平均距离为 3.25±1.37mm。模拟的超声横截面积比实验的小,而纵截面积相似。

结论

目前的结果表明 HAS 和 k-Wave 模拟之间存在一致性,并且 FUS 模拟可以准确预测软组织中的焦点位置和加热。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索