From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine; the Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Public Health Initiatives, and the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, and Gabbay Plastic Surgery.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug;146(2):413-422. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007001.
As social media have become pervasive in contemporary society, plastic surgery content has become commonplace. Two of the most engaging and popular platforms are Instagram and Twitter, and much research has been performed with respect to Twitter. Currently, there are no studies comparing and contrasting the two platforms. The aim of this study was to robustly sample plastic surgery posts on Twitter and Instagram to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate platform content differences.
The hashtag #PlasticSurgery was systematically queried twice per day, for 30 consecutive days, on Twitter and Instagram. Account type, specific media content, possible patient-identifying information, content analysis, and post engagement were assessed. Post volume and engagement between Instagram and Twitter posts were compared. Post characteristics garnering high engagement from each platform were also evaluated.
A total of 3867 Twitter posts and 5098 Instagram posts were included in this analysis. Daily total post volume for the 1-month duration of the study was significantly higher on Instagram compared with Twitter. Overall post engagement was significantly higher on Instagram compared with Twitter. Plastic surgeons and plastic surgery clinics represented the majority of accounts posting on both platforms with #PlasticSurgery. Identifiable patient features were much more prevalent on Instagram. The majority of Instagram posts were promotional in nature, outcome-based, or unrelated to plastic surgery. Alternatively, tweets were predominantly educational in nature.
For physicians to harness the power of social media in plastic surgery, we need to understand how these media are currently being used and how different platforms compare to one another. This study has highlighted the inherent similarities and differences between these two highly popular platforms.
随着社交媒体在当代社会的普及,整形手术内容也变得司空见惯。Instagram 和 Twitter 是两个最具吸引力和人气的平台,针对 Twitter 已经进行了大量研究。目前,尚无比较和对比这两个平台的研究。本研究旨在通过在 Twitter 和 Instagram 上对整形手术帖子进行稳健抽样,从定量和定性两方面评估平台内容差异。
每天在 Twitter 和 Instagram 上两次系统地查询#PlasticSurgery 标签,持续 30 天。评估账户类型、特定媒体内容、可能的患者识别信息、内容分析和帖子参与度。比较 Instagram 和 Twitter 帖子的帖子量和参与度。还评估了每个平台获得高参与度的帖子特征。
本分析共纳入 3867 条 Twitter 帖子和 5098 条 Instagram 帖子。在为期 1 个月的研究中,Instagram 上的每日总帖子量明显高于 Twitter。与 Twitter 相比,Instagram 上的总体帖子参与度明显更高。发布#PlasticSurgery 的帖子的账户主要是整形外科医生和整形外科诊所。Instagram 上更常见可识别的患者特征。大多数 Instagram 帖子具有宣传性质、基于结果或与整形手术无关。相比之下,推文主要具有教育性质。
为了让医生能够利用社交媒体在整形手术中的力量,我们需要了解这些媒体目前是如何被使用的,以及不同平台之间是如何相互比较的。本研究强调了这两个非常受欢迎的平台之间的固有相似性和差异。