• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

珀斯同理心量表的跨文化调适及其临床应用。

Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical application of the Perth Empathy Scale.

机构信息

Institute of Brain Science and Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Psychology, Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;80(7):1473-1489. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23643. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.23643
PMID:38236207
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Alterations of empathy have been observed in patients with various mental disorders. The Perth Empathy Scale (PES) was recently developed to measure a multidimensional construct of empathy across positive and negative emotions. However, its psychometric properties and clinical applications have not been examined in the Chinese context.

METHODS

The Chinese version of the PES was developed and administered to a large Chinese sample (n = 1090). Factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent, discriminant, as well as concurrent validity were examined. Moreover, 50 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 50 healthy controls were recruited to explore the clinical utility of the PES.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analyses supported a theoretically congruent three-factor structure of empathy, namely Cognitive Empathy, Negative Affective Empathy and Positive Affective Empathy. The PES showed good to excellent internal consistency reliability, good convergent and discriminant validity, acceptable concurrent validity, and moderate to high test-retest reliability. Patients with MDD had significantly lower PES scores compared to healthy controls. Linear discriminant function comprised of the three factors correctly differentiated 71% of participants, which further verified the clinical utility of the PES.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated that the Chinese version of the PES is a reliable and valid instrument to measure cognitive and affective empathy across negative and positive emotions, and could therefore be used in both research and clinical practice.

摘要

目的

在各种精神障碍患者中观察到同理心的改变。最近开发了珀斯同理心量表(PES),以衡量积极和消极情绪的同理心的多维结构。然而,其心理测量特性和临床应用尚未在中文环境中进行检查。

方法

开发了 PES 的中文版本,并对大量中国样本(n=1090)进行了测试。检查了因子结构、内部一致性、重测信度以及聚合、区分和同时效度。此外,招募了 50 名患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者和 50 名健康对照者,以探讨 PES 的临床实用性。

结果

验证性因素分析支持同理心的三个理论一致的因素结构,即认知同理心、消极情感同理心和积极情感同理心。PES 表现出良好到优秀的内部一致性信度、良好的聚合和区分效度、可接受的同时效度以及中度到高度的重测信度。与健康对照组相比,患有 MDD 的患者的 PES 得分明显较低。由三个因素组成的线性判别函数正确区分了 71%的参与者,进一步验证了 PES 的临床实用性。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,PES 的中文版本是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于衡量积极和消极情绪的认知和情感同理心,因此可用于研究和临床实践。

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical application of the Perth Empathy Scale.珀斯同理心量表的跨文化调适及其临床应用。
J Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;80(7):1473-1489. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23643. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
The Perth Empathy Scale: Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version and Its Mental Health Correlates.珀斯共情量表:波兰语版本的心理测量特性及其与心理健康的相关性。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Nov 10;13(11):2615-2629. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13110182.
3
Assessing Emotion Regulation Difficulties Across Negative and Positive Emotions: Psychometric Properties and Clinical Applications of the Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory in the Chinese Context.评估正负情绪下的情绪调节困难:珀斯情绪调节能力量表在中国背景下的心理测量特性及临床应用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Sep 24;17:3299-3311. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S478246. eCollection 2024.
4
The Psychometric Assessment of Empathy: Development and Validation of the Perth Empathy Scale.同理心的心理测量评估:珀斯同理心量表的编制与验证
Assessment. 2023 Jun;30(4):1140-1156. doi: 10.1177/10731911221086987. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
5
Validation and extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese setting.《认知与情感共情问卷》在中国背景下的效度验证与拓展
Psych J. 2019 Dec;8(4):439-448. doi: 10.1002/pchj.281. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
6
Chinese version of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire: psychometric properties and clinical applications.《珀斯述情障碍问卷》中文版:心理测量特性与临床应用
Gen Psychiatr. 2024 Mar 11;37(2):e101281. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2023-101281. eCollection 2024.
7
Validation of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in patients with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.验证用于评估精神分裂症、重性抑郁症和双相情感障碍患者认知和情感共情的问卷。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Nov;25(6):466-479. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2020.1846025. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Inpatients with major depressive disorder: Psychometric properties of the new Multidimensional Depression Scale.住院的重性抑郁障碍患者:多维抑郁量表的心理计量学特性。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2016 Dec;24:103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
9
[Psychometric properties of the French version of the How I Think Questionnaire].[《我如何思考问卷》法语版的心理测量学特性]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
10
Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 in China.抑郁焦虑压力量表-21在中国的跨文化验证
Psychol Assess. 2016 May;28(5):e88-e100. doi: 10.1037/pas0000207. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dark and Light Sides of Empathy: The Clinical Relevance of the Assessment of Cognitive and Affective Empathy Across Negative and Positive Emotions.共情的阴暗面与光明面:跨消极与积极情绪的认知共情和情感共情评估的临床相关性
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):38. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15030038.
2
Measuring cognitive and affective empathy across positive and negative emotions: psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Perth Empathy Scale.测量积极和消极情绪下的认知共情和情感共情:珀斯共情量表的心理测量特性和测量不变性
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 11;16:1533611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1533611. eCollection 2025.