Institute of Brain Science and Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Psychology, Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
J Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;80(7):1473-1489. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23643. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
Alterations of empathy have been observed in patients with various mental disorders. The Perth Empathy Scale (PES) was recently developed to measure a multidimensional construct of empathy across positive and negative emotions. However, its psychometric properties and clinical applications have not been examined in the Chinese context.
The Chinese version of the PES was developed and administered to a large Chinese sample (n = 1090). Factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent, discriminant, as well as concurrent validity were examined. Moreover, 50 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 50 healthy controls were recruited to explore the clinical utility of the PES.
Confirmatory factor analyses supported a theoretically congruent three-factor structure of empathy, namely Cognitive Empathy, Negative Affective Empathy and Positive Affective Empathy. The PES showed good to excellent internal consistency reliability, good convergent and discriminant validity, acceptable concurrent validity, and moderate to high test-retest reliability. Patients with MDD had significantly lower PES scores compared to healthy controls. Linear discriminant function comprised of the three factors correctly differentiated 71% of participants, which further verified the clinical utility of the PES.
Our findings indicated that the Chinese version of the PES is a reliable and valid instrument to measure cognitive and affective empathy across negative and positive emotions, and could therefore be used in both research and clinical practice.
在各种精神障碍患者中观察到同理心的改变。最近开发了珀斯同理心量表(PES),以衡量积极和消极情绪的同理心的多维结构。然而,其心理测量特性和临床应用尚未在中文环境中进行检查。
开发了 PES 的中文版本,并对大量中国样本(n=1090)进行了测试。检查了因子结构、内部一致性、重测信度以及聚合、区分和同时效度。此外,招募了 50 名患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者和 50 名健康对照者,以探讨 PES 的临床实用性。
验证性因素分析支持同理心的三个理论一致的因素结构,即认知同理心、消极情感同理心和积极情感同理心。PES 表现出良好到优秀的内部一致性信度、良好的聚合和区分效度、可接受的同时效度以及中度到高度的重测信度。与健康对照组相比,患有 MDD 的患者的 PES 得分明显较低。由三个因素组成的线性判别函数正确区分了 71%的参与者,进一步验证了 PES 的临床实用性。
我们的研究结果表明,PES 的中文版本是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于衡量积极和消极情绪的认知和情感同理心,因此可用于研究和临床实践。