Suppr超能文献

免疫检查点疗法单独使用与联合血管内皮生长因子抑制剂时的不良事件:对1735例患者的汇总荟萃分析

Adverse events of immune checkpoint therapy alone versus when combined with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: a pooled meta-analysis of 1735 patients.

作者信息

Kovalenko Iuliia, Lynn Ng Wern, Geng Yimin, Wang Yinghong, Msaouel Pavlos, Bhatia Shailender, Grivas Petros, Benkhadra Raed, Alhalabi Omar

机构信息

Internal Medicine Department, UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA, United States.

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 4;13:1238517. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1238517. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combining immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi) may result in increased treatment-related and immune-related adverse events (TRAEs and irAEs) compared to ICT alone. This metanalysis was conducted to identify prospective phase II or III clinical studies that evaluated the toxicity profile of ICT + VEGFi compared to ICT alone.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed across all cancer types and major databases until August 10, 2022, and screening was done by two independent investigators. Inclusion criteria included phase 2 or 3 studies with at least one arm of patients treated with combination therapy and one arm treated with monotherapy. Adverse event data were pooled using a restricted maximum likelihood fixed effects model, and heterogeneity using Cochran's Q (chi-square) test.

RESULTS

7 out of 9366 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 808 and 927 patients were treated with ICT monotherapy and a combination of ICT with VEGFi, respectively. Only one study reported irAEs, so the analysis was restricted to TRAEs. The total number of TRAEs was significantly higher in the ICT + VEGFi group (RR:1.49; 95% CI 1.37 -1.62; p=1.5×10-21), and more frequent treatment withdrawals were attributed to TRAEs (RR:3.10; 95% CI 1.12-8.59; p=0.029). The highest TRAE effect size increases noted for rash (RR 6.50; 95% CI 3.76 - 11.25; p=2.1×10-11), hypertension (RR:6.07; 95% CI 3.69-10.00; p=1.3×10-12), hypothyroidism (RR:5.02; 95% CI 3.08 - 8.19; p=8.9×10-11), and diarrhea (RR:4.94; 95% CI 3.21-7.62; p=3.8×10-13). Other significantly more frequent TRAEs included nausea, anemia, anorexia, and proteinuria.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with ICT and VEGFi carries a higher risk of certain TRAEs, such as rash, hypertension, hypothyroidism, diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, and proteinuria, compared to ICT monotherapy. More granular details on the cause of AEs, particularly irAEs, should be provided in future trials of such regimens.

摘要

背景

与单独使用免疫检查点疗法(ICT)相比,联合使用免疫检查点疗法(ICT)和血管内皮生长因子抑制剂(VEGFi)可能会导致更多与治疗相关和免疫相关的不良事件(TRAEs和irAEs)。本荟萃分析旨在确定前瞻性II期或III期临床研究,以评估ICT + VEGFi与单独使用ICT相比的毒性特征。

方法

在所有癌症类型和主要数据库中进行系统检索,直至2022年8月10日,由两名独立研究人员进行筛选。纳入标准包括2期或3期研究,其中至少有一组患者接受联合治疗,另一组接受单一疗法治疗。使用受限最大似然固定效应模型汇总不良事件数据,并使用Cochran's Q(卡方)检验分析异质性。

结果

9366项研究中有7项符合纳入标准,分别有808例和927例患者接受了ICT单一疗法和ICT与VEGFi联合疗法治疗。只有一项研究报告了irAEs,因此分析仅限于TRAEs。ICT + VEGFi组的TRAEs总数显著更高(RR:1.49;95%CI 1.37 - 1.62;p = 1.5×10 - 21),因TRAEs导致的治疗停药更频繁(RR:3.10;95%CI 1.12 - 8.59;p = 0.029)。皮疹(RR 6.50;95%CI 3.76 - 11.25;p = 2.1×10 - 11)、高血压(RR:6.07;95%CI 3.69 - 10.00;p = 1.3×10 - 12)、甲状腺功能减退(RR:5.02;95%CI 3.08 - 8.19;p = 8.9×10 - 11)和腹泻(RR:4.94;95%CI 3.21 - 7.62;p = 3.8×10 - 13)的TRAEs效应量增加最为显著。其他明显更频繁出现的TRAEs包括恶心、贫血、厌食和蛋白尿。

结论

与ICT单一疗法相比,ICT和VEGFi联合疗法出现某些TRAEs的风险更高,如皮疹、高血压、甲状腺功能减退、腹泻、恶心、厌食和蛋白尿。在此类治疗方案未来的试验中,应提供关于不良事件原因(尤其是irAEs)的更详细信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1620/10796151/e5435c99e70a/fonc-13-1238517-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验