Mackenbach J P
Soc Sci Med. 1987;24(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90051-7.
In a number of countries, regional levels of administration have assumed responsibilities for the health care sector. This paper presents a specification of epidemiological information that could be relevant for health care policy towards and within regions, as well as a review of British and Scandinavian attempts at using routinely available mortality data for these purposes. A Dutch case study is then presented. To determine whether regional mortality data by cause of death can be used as indicators of need for health care, and consequently be used as criteria for the allocation of financial resources, the correspondence between provincial disease-specific mortality, hospital admissions and new cases of disability benefits was analyzed. the findings were not convincing: for a number of diseases a reasonable correspondence between mortality and hospital admissions could be shown; for other conditions, however, especially ischaemic heart disease, none at all. It is concluded that: in the context of the formal allocation of health care resources to administrative units, a strong confidence in mortality data by cause of death is unwarranted; in the (broader) context of developing and evaluating regional health care policy, mortality data by cause of death can be useful for providing a focus on population health status and a starting point for further studies.
在许多国家,地区行政层级已承担起医疗卫生部门的职责。本文阐述了与地区间及地区内医疗卫生政策相关的流行病学信息规范,还回顾了英国和斯堪的纳维亚地区利用常规可得死亡率数据用于这些目的的尝试。接着呈现了一个荷兰的案例研究。为了确定按死因划分的地区死亡率数据是否可作为医疗卫生需求的指标,并因此用作财政资源分配的标准,分析了省级特定疾病死亡率、医院入院人数与残疾津贴新病例之间的对应关系。研究结果并不令人信服:对于一些疾病,死亡率与医院入院人数之间能呈现出合理的对应关系;然而对于其他病症,尤其是缺血性心脏病,却完全没有对应关系。得出的结论是:在将医疗卫生资源正式分配给行政单位的背景下,对按死因划分的死亡率数据抱有强烈信心是没有根据的;在制定和评估地区医疗卫生政策的(更广泛)背景下,按死因划分的死亡率数据有助于聚焦人群健康状况,并为进一步研究提供一个起点。