FoodChain ID, 504 N. 4th Street, Fairfield, IA 52556, USA.
Henry Chin and Associates, 5781 El Dorado Ln., Dublin, CA 94568, USA.
J Food Prot. 2024 Mar;87(3):100227. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100227. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
Food fraud prevention and detection remains a challenging problem, despite recent developments in regulatory and auditing requirements. In 2012, the United States Pharmacopeial Convention created a database of food ingredient fraud. The objective of this research was to report on updates made to the database structure and to provide an updated analysis of food fraud records. The restructured database was relational and included four tables: ingredients, adulterants, adulteration records, and references. Four adulteration record types were created to capture the variety of information that can be found in public food fraud reports. Information was searched and extracted from the peer-reviewed scientific literature, media publications, regulatory reports, judicial records, trade association reports, and other public sources covering 1980-present. Over an almost seven-year data entry period, a total of 15,575 records were entered, sourced primarily from the peer-reviewed literature and media reports. The percentage of records that included at least one potentially hazardous adulterant ranged from 34% to 60%, depending on the record type. The ingredients with the highest number of incident and inference records included fluid cow's milk, extra virgin olive oil, honey, beef, and chili powder. The ingredient groups with the highest number of incident and inference records included Dairy Ingredients, Seafood Products, Meat and Poultry Products, Herbs, Spices, and Seasonings, Milk and Cream, and Alcoholic Beverages. This database was created to serve as a standardized source of information about publicly documented occurrences of food fraud and other information relevant to fraud risk to support food fraud vulnerability assessments, mitigation plans, and food safety plans. These data support the contention that food fraud presents a public health risk that should continue to be addressed by food safety systems worldwide.
食品欺诈的预防和检测仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题,尽管监管和审核要求最近有所发展。2012 年,美国药典委员会创建了一个食品成分欺诈数据库。本研究的目的是报告数据库结构的更新,并提供食品欺诈记录的最新分析。重构后的数据库是关系型的,包括四个表:成分、掺杂物、掺假记录和参考文献。创建了四种掺假记录类型,以捕获公共食品欺诈报告中可能发现的各种信息。信息从同行评议的科学文献、媒体出版物、监管报告、司法记录、贸易协会报告和其他涵盖 1980 年至今的公开来源中进行搜索和提取。在近七年的数据录入期间,共录入了 15575 条记录,主要来源是同行评议文献和媒体报道。至少包含一种潜在危险掺杂物的记录比例从 34%到 60%不等,具体取决于记录类型。包含最多事件和推断记录的成分包括液态牛奶、特级初榨橄榄油、蜂蜜、牛肉和辣椒粉。包含最多事件和推断记录的成分组包括乳制品成分、海鲜产品、肉类和家禽产品、草药、香料和调味料、牛奶和奶油以及酒精饮料。该数据库的创建是为了作为公开记录的食品欺诈事件和与欺诈风险相关的其他信息的标准化来源,以支持食品欺诈脆弱性评估、缓解计划和食品安全计划。这些数据支持了这样一种观点,即食品欺诈构成了公共健康风险,全球食品安全系统应继续对此加以应对。