• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉国 COVID-19 应对背景下的风险沟通和社区参与:一项定性研究。

Risk communication and community engagement in the context of COVID-19 response in Bangladesh: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Health Systems and Population Studies Division, ICDDR,B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Scotland.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1267446. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1267446. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1267446
PMID:38249367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10799557/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The global COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted nations worldwide, and Bangladesh was no exception. In response, the government of Bangladesh implemented community awareness initiatives aimed at containing the spread of the virus, aligned with international guidelines and recommendations. Despite these efforts, a lack of comprehensive community awareness programs played an essential role during the pandemic, not the preventive measures. A qualitative study employing framing theory was conducted to gain a deeper insight into how the social context influenced risk communication and community response throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh.

METHODS

The study was conducted in four selected districts of Bangladesh from February to May 2022 using complementary data collection methods, including key informant interviews, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions with purposely selected participants. Data were analyzed thematically by following six steps of the thematic analysis process. Codes were developed based on the data and summarized into themes and sub-themes grounded on the codes.

RESULTS

The findings indicate that the government of Bangladesh, along with development partners and non-government organizations, made a significant effort to raise awareness about COVID-19 in the community. However, there were certain limitations to this effort. These include a lack of social science and public health approaches to understanding the pandemic; inadequate coordination among the authorities for COVID-19 prevention and control; technological and geographical barriers for disseminating messages; the living conditions and lack of facilities; socio-cultural norms in understanding the COVID-19 health messages, and the gendered understanding of the messages. The findings also revealed that the awareness activities remained a one-way approach to inform the people and faced challenges to actively engage and create ownership of the community in the pandemic response.

CONCLUSION

The study identified gaps in implementing risk communication and community engagement strategies in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic. Increasing focus on public health and prioritizing community ownership is essential to designing a more effective community awareness campaign. This approach will help ensure that health messages are communicated effectively and tailored to different communities' needs.

摘要

背景

全球 COVID-19 大流行深刻影响了世界各国,孟加拉国也不例外。为此,孟加拉国政府实施了旨在遏制病毒传播的社区意识倡议,这些倡议与国际准则和建议保持一致。尽管做出了这些努力,但在大流行期间,缺乏全面的社区意识计划发挥了重要作用,而不是预防措施。本研究采用框架理论,对影响孟加拉国 COVID-19 大流行期间风险沟通和社区反应的社会背景进行了深入研究。

方法

本研究于 2022 年 2 月至 5 月在孟加拉国的四个选定地区进行,采用了互补的数据收集方法,包括与精心挑选的参与者进行的关键人物访谈、深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。研究人员按照主题分析过程的六个步骤对数据进行了主题分析。根据数据开发了代码,并根据代码总结为主题和子主题。

结果

研究结果表明,孟加拉国政府与发展伙伴和非政府组织一起,努力在社区中提高对 COVID-19 的认识。然而,这项工作存在一定的局限性。这些局限性包括缺乏社会科学和公共卫生方法来理解大流行;当局在 COVID-19 预防和控制方面协调不足;传播信息的技术和地理障碍;生活条件和缺乏设施;在理解 COVID-19 健康信息方面的社会文化规范;以及对信息的性别理解。研究结果还表明,意识活动仍然是一种单向的方式来告知民众,并且在积极参与和让社区拥有权方面面临挑战。

结论

本研究确定了孟加拉国在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施风险沟通和社区参与战略方面的差距。增加对公共卫生的关注和优先考虑社区所有权对于设计更有效的社区意识活动至关重要。这种方法将有助于确保健康信息得到有效传达,并根据不同社区的需求进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5635/10799557/86b960f2e366/fpubh-11-1267446-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5635/10799557/35bd702c2051/fpubh-11-1267446-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5635/10799557/86b960f2e366/fpubh-11-1267446-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5635/10799557/35bd702c2051/fpubh-11-1267446-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5635/10799557/86b960f2e366/fpubh-11-1267446-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk communication and community engagement in the context of COVID-19 response in Bangladesh: a qualitative study.孟加拉国 COVID-19 应对背景下的风险沟通和社区参与:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1267446. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1267446. eCollection 2023.
2
Understanding the challenges and gaps in community engagement interventions for COVID-19 prevention strategies in Rohingya refugees: a qualitative study with frontline workers and community representatives.了解罗兴亚难民 COVID-19 预防策略社区参与干预措施中的挑战和差距:与一线工作者和社区代表的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;11:1169050. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1169050. eCollection 2023.
3
Participatory action research to co-design a culturally appropriate COVID-19 risk communication and community engagement strategy in rural Pakistan.参与式行动研究共同设计一个适合巴基斯坦农村的 COVID-19 风险沟通和社区参与策略。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;11:1160964. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1160964. eCollection 2023.
4
A formative research to explore the programmatic approach of vaccinating the Rohingya refugees and host communities against COVID-19 infection in Bangladesh.在孟加拉国开展一项探索性研究,以探讨为罗兴亚难民和收容社区接种疫苗以预防 COVID-19 感染的计划性方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 31;23(1):937. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09945-z.
5
Community risk perception and barriers for the practice of COVID-19 prevention measures in Northwest Ethiopia: A qualitative study.社区对 COVID-19 预防措施实践的风险感知和障碍:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257897. eCollection 2021.
6
Community health workers for non-communicable diseases prevention and control in Bangladesh: a qualitative study.孟加拉国预防和控制非传染性疾病的社区卫生工作者:一项定性研究。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Dec 24;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00182-z.
7
COVID-19 vaccine barriers and perception among rural adults: a qualitative study in Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村成年人对 COVID-19 疫苗的认知和障碍:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 18;13(10):e074357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074357.
8
Pandemic lessons on essential healthcare services for the urban poor: a qualitative perspective of users and providers in Bangladesh.大流行对城市贫困人口基本医疗服务的教训:孟加拉国用户和提供者的定性视角。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 29;14(8):e082706. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082706.
9
Examining Roles, Support, and Experiences of Community Health Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bangladesh: A Mixed Methods Study.考察孟加拉国社区卫生工作者在 COVID-19 大流行期间的角色、支持和经历:一项混合方法研究。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Aug 30;10(4). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00761.
10
Midwife-led pandemic telemedicine services for maternal health and gender-based violence screening in Bangladesh: an implementation research case study.孟加拉国导乐主导的大流行病远程医疗服务在孕产妇保健和基于性别的暴力筛查方面的应用:一项实施研究案例分析。
Reprod Health. 2023 Aug 29;20(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01674-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of cyberbullying with major depressive disorders among Bangladeshi female adolescents: findings from the Bangladesh adolescent health and wellbeing survey 2019-20.孟加拉国女性青少年中网络欺凌与重度抑郁症的关联:2019 - 20年孟加拉国青少年健康与幸福调查结果
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07234-z.
2
Lessons learned: enhancing rural risk communication for future health crises through the PHERCC framework.经验教训:通过公共卫生应急风险沟通协作中心(PHERCC)框架加强农村地区未来卫生危机的风险沟通。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;13:1594833. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594833. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation barriers and facilitators to a COVID-19 intervention in Bangladesh: The benefits of engaging the community for the delivery of the programme.孟加拉国 COVID-19 干预措施的实施障碍和促进因素:为实施该计划让社区参与的好处。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 28;22(1):1590. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08939-7.
2
A Rapid Ethnographic Assessment of Cultural and Social Perceptions and Practices About COVID-19 in Bangladesh: What the Policy Makers and Program Planners Should Know.孟加拉国关于 COVID-19 的文化和社会认知及实践的快速民族志评估:政策制定者和规划者应该了解的情况。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Jun;32(7):1114-1125. doi: 10.1177/10497323221091516. Epub 2022 May 11.
3
Experiences of Public Health Professionals Regarding Crisis Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.
公共卫生专业人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行危机沟通的经验:定性研究的系统评价
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Mar 14;5:e66524. doi: 10.2196/66524.
4
Sharing lessons learned from COVID-19 vaccine introductions: a global community forum for countries.分享从新冠疫苗引入中吸取的经验教训:为各国举办的全球社区论坛。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 14;12:1376113. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1376113. eCollection 2024.
Exploring the lived experiences of pregnant women and community health care providers during the pandemic of COVID-19 in Bangladesh through a phenomenological analysis.
通过现象学分析探索孟加拉国 COVID-19 大流行期间孕妇和社区卫生保健提供者的生活体验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Dec 5;21(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04284-5.
4
Bangladesh reported delta variant of coronavirus among its citizen: Actionable items to tackle the potential massive third wave.孟加拉国报告在其公民中发现新冠病毒德尔塔变种:应对潜在大规模第三波疫情的可行动事项。
Infect Prev Pract. 2021 Sep;3(3):100159. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100159. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Decreasing transmission and initiation of countrywide vaccination: Key challenges for future management of COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh.全国范围内疫苗接种的传播和启动减少:孟加拉国未来管理 COVID-19 大流行的关键挑战。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1014-1029. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3156. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
6
"Infodemic" COVID 19: More Pandemic than the Virus.“信息疫情”下的新冠疫情:比病毒更具传播性
Indian J Nephrol. 2020 May-Jun;30(3):188-191. doi: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_216_20. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
7
COVID-19 in Bangladesh: public awareness and insufficient health facilities remain key challenges.孟加拉国的新冠肺炎疫情:公众意识和卫生设施不足仍是主要挑战。
Public Health. 2020 Jun;183:50-51. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects of COVID-19; a Narrative Review.新型冠状病毒肺炎的流行病学和临床特征;一篇叙述性综述
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 1;8(1):e41. eCollection 2020.
9
A commentary on "World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)".对《世界卫生组织宣布全球紧急状态:2019新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)综述》的评论
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:128-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
How to fight an infodemic.如何应对信息疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.