• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验教训:通过公共卫生应急风险沟通协作中心(PHERCC)框架加强农村地区未来卫生危机的风险沟通。

Lessons learned: enhancing rural risk communication for future health crises through the PHERCC framework.

作者信息

Leslie Abimbola, Woods Elizabeth K, van den Broek-Altenburg Eline M, Stein Gary S, Carney Jan K

机构信息

Larner College of Medicine University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;13:1594833. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594833. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594833
PMID:40538684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12177165/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, highlight the critical role of effective risk communication in managing crises. The Public Health Emergency Risk and Crisis Communication framework (PHERCC) provides a structured approach to crafting, delivering, and refining public health messages to build trust, promote compliance, and enhance societal resilience.

METHODS

This qualitative study examined COVID-19 risk communication strategies in rural Northern New England using the PHERCC framework. Data were collected through seventeen stakeholder interviews, seven focus groups, and a pilot study conducted between November 2022 and March 2023. Stakeholders represented state and local organizations, while focus group participants included rural residents. A thematic analysis using NVivo software aligned findings with the six PHERCC domains: Evidence, Initiator, Channel, Publics, Message, and Feedback.

RESULTS

Stakeholders emphasized transparency in public health messaging, adapting to evolving evidence while maintaining consistency. Trusted local sources and traditional media were essential for reaching vulnerable populations, particularly older adults in rural areas. Public feedback highlighted barriers such as misinformation, translation challenges, and limited internet access. The pilot study confirmed that community collaboration and tailored messaging increased understanding and trust among rural residents. Simplified accessible core messages and consistent updates further enhanced public engagement.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the importance of evidence-based, adaptive, and population subgroup sensitive communication during public health emergencies. The PHERCC framework proved instrumental in addressing challenges, promoting trust, and refining strategies. Investing in inclusive communication systems and leveraging community partnerships are important for effective responses to future health crises.

摘要

引言

诸如新冠疫情这样的突发公共卫生事件凸显了有效风险沟通在危机管理中的关键作用。突发公共卫生事件风险与危机沟通框架(PHERCC)提供了一种结构化方法,用于制定、传递和完善公共卫生信息,以建立信任、促进合规并增强社会复原力。

方法

本定性研究使用PHERCC框架审视了新英格兰北部农村地区的新冠疫情风险沟通策略。数据收集于2022年11月至2023年3月期间,通过17次利益相关者访谈、7次焦点小组讨论以及一项试点研究进行。利益相关者代表州和地方组织,而焦点小组参与者包括农村居民。使用NVivo软件进行的主题分析将研究结果与PHERCC的六个领域对齐:证据、发起者、渠道、受众、信息和反馈。

结果

利益相关者强调公共卫生信息传递中的透明度,在适应不断变化的证据的同时保持一致性。可靠的本地信息源和传统媒体对于覆盖弱势群体,特别是农村地区的老年人至关重要。公众反馈突出了诸如错误信息、翻译挑战和互联网接入受限等障碍。试点研究证实,社区合作和量身定制的信息增强了农村居民的理解和信任。简化易懂的核心信息和持续更新进一步提高了公众参与度。

结论

本研究表明了在突发公共卫生事件期间基于证据、适应性强且对人群亚组敏感的沟通的重要性。PHERCC框架在应对挑战、促进信任和完善策略方面发挥了重要作用。投资于包容性沟通系统并利用社区伙伴关系对于有效应对未来的健康危机至关重要。

相似文献

1
Lessons learned: enhancing rural risk communication for future health crises through the PHERCC framework.经验教训:通过公共卫生应急风险沟通协作中心(PHERCC)框架加强农村地区未来卫生危机的风险沟通。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;13:1594833. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594833. eCollection 2025.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
4
Engaging Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Research: Qualitative Substudy of Factors Impacting Participation.让社区居住的老年人参与研究:影响参与因素的定性子研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 3;9:e74191. doi: 10.2196/74191.
5
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
6
Implementing capacity-building initiatives addressing health equity through community-academic partnerships: A qualitative study.通过社区-学术伙伴关系实施解决健康公平问题的能力建设举措:一项定性研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf017.
7
Hybrid Hospital-at-Home Program in Singapore: Ethnographic Study.新加坡的居家与医院混合项目:人种志研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e66107. doi: 10.2196/66107.
8
Identifying determinants for promoting public engagement via Chinese E-government TikTok in public health emergencies.确定在突发公共卫生事件中通过中国电子政务抖音促进公众参与的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0325967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325967. eCollection 2025.
9
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
10
Continued Implementation and Use of a Digital Informal Care Support Platform Before and After COVID-19: Multimethod Study.COVID-19 前后数字非正式护理支持平台的持续实施与使用:多方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 31;8:e54734. doi: 10.2196/54734.

引用本文的文献

1
H5N1 preparedness must integrate rural and agricultural realities.H5N1防范措施必须整合农村和农业的实际情况。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jul 12;48:101186. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101186. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
From Cyclones to Cybersecurity: A Call for Convergence in Risk and Crisis Communications Research.从气旋到网络安全:呼吁风险与危机传播研究的融合
J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2025 Feb 10;22(2):119-138. doi: 10.1515/jhsem-2023-0067. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Perspectives of Vietnamese Americans Regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Trusted Sources of Information, and Pandemic-related Challenges.美籍越南人对新冠疫苗接种、可靠信息来源及疫情相关挑战的看法
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Mar 8. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02327-7.
3
The future of health and risk communication.
健康与风险沟通的未来。
J Commun Healthc. 2025 Mar;18(1):1-5. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2025.2469947. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
4
A narrative literature review to inform the development of a health threats preparedness framework in Ireland.一篇叙述性文献综述,为爱尔兰健康威胁防范框架的制定提供信息。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 6;13:1490850. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1490850. eCollection 2025.
5
Enhancing information for action: A strategic tool for strengthening public health emergency management systems.加强行动信息:强化公共卫生应急管理系统的战略工具。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Apr;196:105791. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105791. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
6
Bridging the rural-urban divide: A commentary on Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes.弥合城乡差距:关于城乡通勤区号的评论
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12911. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12911.
7
Developing a comprehensive framework for evaluating public health emergency management program implementation: A scoping review.制定一个用于评估公共卫生应急管理项目实施情况的综合框架:一项范围综述。
Public Health. 2025 Feb;239:22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.012. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
8
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication and Emotional Appeals in COVID-19 Public Health Messaging: Quantitative Content Analysis.新冠疫情公共卫生信息传递中的危机和紧急风险沟通及情感诉求:定量内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 17;26:e56854. doi: 10.2196/56854.
9
Mortality and morbidity in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.危重症 COVID-19 患者的死亡率和发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Infect Public Health. 2024 Oct;17(10):102533. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102533. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
10
A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review.全面分析新冠病毒错误信息、公共卫生影响和传播策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 21;26:e56931. doi: 10.2196/56931.