• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫患儿家长用药知识量表的编制、信效度研究

Development, Reliability and Validity of the Medication Literacy Scale for Parents of Children with Epilepsy.

作者信息

Wu Xiaokun, Cai Shu, Zhou Ye, Lan Yutao, Lin Yan

机构信息

School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Department of Nursing, Luzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jan 17;18:165-176. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S446081. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S446081
PMID:38249684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10800104/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a medication literacy scale for parents of children with epilepsy (MLSPCE) and to test the reliability and validity of the scale.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The pilot scale was formulated based on the concept of medication literacy, the knowledge-attitude-practice model, and relevant literature reviews. It was formed through two rounds of expert consultations using the Delphi method. A survey of 657 parents of children with epilepsy, who were admitted to the neurology department or examined in the neuro-electrophysiological outpatient department of Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center, using the pilot scale was conducted from October 2021 to January 2022 to test the reliability and validity of the scale questionnaire. The content validity of the scale questionnaire was assessed by consulting 20 neurology nursing, neurology clinician, and nursing education experts. Numbers, percentages, -test, correlation analysis, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and factor analysis were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The MLSPCE included 34 items in four dimensions. Ten factors were drawn from the explorative factor analysis, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 62.32%. The content validity index of each item on the 34-item scale was between 0.81 and 1.0, and the scale-content validity index/ average was 0.97. The correlation coefficient between each item and its dimension was between 0.399 and 0.760, the correlation coefficients between dimensions were between 0.150 and 0.382, and the correlation coefficients between each dimension and the total scale were between 0.390 and 0.845. Differences for all comparisons were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.864, and the split-half reliability of the total scale was 0.923.

CONCLUSION

All the statistical procedures performed in the validity and reliability stages of the study showed that MLSPCE is a valid and reliable tool for measuring medication literacy among Chinese parents of children with epilepsy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种用于癫痫患儿家长的用药素养量表(MLSPCE),并检验该量表的信效度。

患者与方法

初步量表基于用药素养的概念、知信行模型及相关文献综述制定。通过两轮德尔菲法专家咨询形成该量表。于2021年10月至2022年1月,使用初步量表对657名在广州妇女儿童医疗中心神经内科住院或在神经电生理门诊就诊的癫痫患儿家长进行调查,以检验量表问卷的信效度。通过咨询20名神经内科护理、神经内科临床医生及护理教育专家评估量表问卷的内容效度。数据分析采用数值、百分比、t检验、相关分析、Cronbach's α信度系数及因子分析。

结果

MLSPCE包括四个维度的34个条目。探索性因子分析提取出10个因子,累积方差贡献率为62.32%。34个条目量表中各条目的内容效度指数在0.81至1.0之间,量表内容效度指数/均值为0.97。各条目与其维度的相关系数在0.399至0.760之间,维度间的相关系数在0.150至0.382之间,各维度与总量表的相关系数在0.390至0.845之间。所有比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.864,总量表的分半信度为0.923。

结论

本研究在效度和信度阶段所进行的所有统计程序均表明,MLSPCE是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于测量中国癫痫患儿家长的用药素养。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b86b/10800104/2fd21f404651/PPA-18-165-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b86b/10800104/e7501a18239c/PPA-18-165-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b86b/10800104/2fd21f404651/PPA-18-165-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b86b/10800104/e7501a18239c/PPA-18-165-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b86b/10800104/2fd21f404651/PPA-18-165-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development, Reliability and Validity of the Medication Literacy Scale for Parents of Children with Epilepsy.癫痫患儿家长用药知识量表的编制、信效度研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jan 17;18:165-176. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S446081. eCollection 2024.
2
The Development and Psychometric Assessment of Chinese Medication Literacy Scale for Hypertensive Patients (C-MLSHP).高血压患者中文用药素养量表(C-MLSHP)的编制与心理测量学评估
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Apr 30;11:490. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00490. eCollection 2020.
3
[Development of a risk assessment scale and test of its validity and reliability for venous thromboembolism in adult burn patients].[成人烧伤患者静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估量表的研制及其效度和信度检验]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 20;38(8):778-787. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210322-00098.
4
Psychometric properties and validation of the revised Chinese Medication Literacy Scale for Hypertensive Patients (C-MLSHP-R).高血压患者中文药物素养量表修订版(C-MLSHP-R)的心理测量学特性及效度验证
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 6;9:976691. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.976691. eCollection 2022.
5
Development and validation of the parental health literacy scale for children with asthma (PHLSCA).儿童哮喘家长健康素养量表(PHLSCA)的编制与验证。
J Asthma. 2024 Nov;61(11):1523-1534. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2365899. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
6
[Dietary literacy questionaire for school-age children's daily diet providers and its reliability and validity].[面向学龄儿童日常饮食提供者的饮食素养问卷及其信效度]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2020 Jul;49(4):546-553. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2020.04.004.
7
Development and validation of the hospice professional coping scale among Chinese nurses.中文版护生专业应对量表的编制与信效度检验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 20;24(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10970-9.
8
[Development of parenting behavior scale for caregivers of children aged 2 to 6 years and analysis for its reliability and validity].[2至6岁儿童照顾者养育行为量表的编制及其信效度分析]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 6;57(1):58-62. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220208-00111.
9
Development and validation of the family management scale for children with asthma (FMSCA).儿童哮喘家庭管理量表(FMSCA)的编制与验证
J Asthma. 2020 Apr;57(4):441-451. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1571085. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
[Development and Reliability and Validity Analysis of the Knowledge,Attitude,and Practice Evaluation Scale for Teachers' Early Childhood Sex Education].[幼儿教师性教育知识、态度与实践评价量表的编制及信效度分析]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2024 Oct;46(5):666-670. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16023.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of medication literacy scale for adults: MELSA version II.成人用药素养量表的开发与验证:MELSA 第二版
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):987. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22200-w.
2
Development and Validation of the Healthcare-Seeking Intention Questionnaire in Patients with Diabetic High-Risk Foot.糖尿病高危足患者就医意向问卷的编制与验证
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Sep 12;18:1873-1883. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S479644. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability.突发焦虑量表:编制、效度与信度
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Mar 11;8(5):443-453. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.69077. eCollection 2021.
2
Knowledge and Fears of Parents of Children Diagnosed with Epilepsy.癫痫患儿父母的知识与担忧
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Sep-Oct;60:311-313. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
3
Development of the novice nurse practitioner role transition scale: An exploratory factor analysis.新手护士从业者角色转换量表的编制:一项探索性因素分析。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2021 Feb 18;34(1):79-88. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000566.
4
Epilepsy-Definition, Classification, Pathophysiology, and Epidemiology.癫痫-定义、分类、病理生理学和流行病学。
Semin Neurol. 2020 Dec;40(6):617-623. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718719. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
The Development and Psychometric Assessment of Chinese Medication Literacy Scale for Hypertensive Patients (C-MLSHP).高血压患者中文用药素养量表(C-MLSHP)的编制与心理测量学评估
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Apr 30;11:490. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00490. eCollection 2020.
6
Self-reported antiepilepsy medication adherence and its connection to perception of medication error.自我报告的抗癫痫药物依从性及其与药物错误感知的关系。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Mar;104(Pt A):106896. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106896. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
7
Association Between Medication Literacy and Medication Adherence Among Patients With Hypertension.高血压患者的用药知识水平与用药依从性之间的关联
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jul 19;10:822. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00822. eCollection 2019.
8
RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.结构方程模型中有序分类数据的 RMSEA、CFI 和 TLI:他们讲述的故事取决于估计方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):409-428. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2.
9
Inappropriate self-medication among adolescents and its association with lower medication literacy and substance use.青少年不适当的自我用药及其与较低的用药知识和物质使用的关联。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0189199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189199. eCollection 2017.
10
Incidence and Prevalence of Childhood Epilepsy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.儿童癫痫的发病率和患病率:一项全国性队列研究。
Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3908. Epub 2017 Apr 5.