Koutsoumanis Konstantinos, Allende Ana, Bolton Declan, Bover-Cid Sara, Chemaly Marianne, De Cesare Alessandra, Herman Lieve, Hilbert Friederike, Lindqvist Roland, Nauta Maarten, Nonno Romolo, Peixe Luisa, Ru Giuseppe, Simmons Marion, Skandamis Panagiotis, Suffredini Elisabetta, Fox Edward, Gosling Rebecca Becky, Gil Beatriz Melero, Møretrø Trond, Stessl Beatrix, da Silva Felício Maria Teresa, Messens Winy, Simon Ancuta Cezara, Alvarez-Ordóñez Avelino
EFSA J. 2024 Jan 19;22(1):e8521. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8521. eCollection 2024 Jan.
(in the meat, fish and seafood, dairy and fruit and vegetable sectors), (in the feed, meat, egg and low moisture food sectors) and (in the low moisture food sector) were identified as the bacterial food safety hazards most relevant to public health that are associated with persistence in the food and feed processing environment (FFPE). There is a wide range of subtypes of these hazards involved in persistence in the FFPE. While some specific subtypes are more commonly reported as persistent, it is currently not possible to identify universal markers (i.e. genetic determinants) for this trait. Common risk factors for persistence in the FFPE are inadequate zoning and hygiene barriers; lack of hygienic design of equipment and machines; and inadequate cleaning and disinfection. A well-designed environmental sampling and testing programme is the most effective strategy to identify contamination sources and detect potentially persistent hazards. The establishment of hygienic barriers and measures within the food safety management system, during implementation of hazard analysis and critical control points, is key to prevent and/or control bacterial persistence in the FFPE. Once persistence is suspected in a plant, a 'seek-and-destroy' approach is frequently recommended, including intensified monitoring, the introduction of control measures and the continuation of the intensified monitoring. Successful actions triggered by persistence of are described, as well as interventions with direct bactericidal activity. These interventions could be efficient if properly validated, correctly applied and verified under industrial conditions. Perspectives are provided for performing a risk assessment for relevant combinations of hazard and food sector to assess the relative public health risk that can be associated with persistence, based on bottom-up and top-down approaches. Knowledge gaps related to bacterial food safety hazards associated with persistence in the FFPE and priorities for future research are provided.
(在肉类、鱼类和海鲜、乳制品以及水果和蔬菜行业)、(在饲料、肉类、蛋类和低水分食品行业)以及(在低水分食品行业)中,被确定为与公共卫生最相关的细菌性食品安全危害,这些危害与在食品和饲料加工环境(FFPE)中的持久性有关。在FFPE中存在多种与持久性相关的这些危害的亚型。虽然某些特定亚型更常被报告为具有持久性,但目前尚无法确定该特性的通用标记(即基因决定因素)。FFPE中持久性的常见风险因素包括分区和卫生屏障不足;设备和机器的卫生设计缺乏;以及清洁和消毒不足。精心设计的环境采样和检测计划是识别污染源和检测潜在持久性危害的最有效策略。在食品安全管理体系中,在实施危害分析与关键控制点期间建立卫生屏障和措施,是预防和/或控制FFPE中细菌持久性的关键。一旦怀疑工厂存在持久性问题,通常建议采用“查找并消灭”方法,包括加强监测、引入控制措施以及持续加强监测。描述了由[具体细菌名称]持久性引发的成功行动,以及具有直接杀菌活性的干预措施。如果在工业条件下经过适当验证、正确应用和核实,这些干预措施可能会有效。基于自下而上和自上而下的方法,提供了对相关危害和食品行业组合进行风险评估的视角,以评估与持久性相关的相对公共卫生风险。还提供了与FFPE中持久性相关的细菌性食品安全危害的知识差距以及未来研究的重点。