Huang Jinting, Cai Aomeng, Wang Weisi, He Kuan, Zou Shuangshuang, Ma Qingxia
College of Surveying and Mapping Engineering, Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions, Ministry of Education, College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Toxics. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):81. doi: 10.3390/toxics12010081.
Despite significant improvements in air quality during and after COVID-19 restrictions, haze continued to occur in Zhengzhou afterwards. This paper compares ionic compositions and sources of PM before (2019), during (2020), and after (2021) the restrictions to explore the reasons for the haze. The average concentration of PM decreased by 28.5% in 2020 and 27.9% in 2021, respectively, from 102.49 μg m in 2019. The concentration of secondary inorganic aerosols (SIAs) was 51.87 μg m in 2019, which decreased by 3.1% in 2020 and 12.8% in 2021. In contrast, the contributions of SIAs to PM increased from 50.61% (2019) to 68.6% (2020) and 61.2% (2021). SIAs contributed significantly to PM levels in 2020-2021. Despite a 2262% decline in NO levels in 2020-2021, the increased O caused a similar NO concentration (20.6923.00 μg m) in 2020-2021 to that (22.93 μg m) in 2019, hindering PM reduction in Zhengzhou. Six PM sources, including secondary inorganic aerosols, industrial emissions, coal combustion, biomass burning, soil dust, and traffic emissions, were identified by the positive matrix factorization model in 2019-2021. Compared to 2019, the reduction in PM from the secondary aerosol source in 2020 and 2021 was small, and the contribution of secondary aerosol to PM increased by 13.32% in 2020 and 12.94% in 2021. In comparison, the primary emissions, including biomass burning, traffic, and dust, were reduced by 29.71% in 2020 and 27.7% in 2021. The results indicated that the secondary production did not significantly contribute to the PM decrease during and after the COVID-19 restrictions. Therefore, it is essential to understand the formation of secondary aerosols under high O and low precursor gases to mitigate air pollution in the future.
尽管在新冠疫情管控期间及之后空气质量有了显著改善,但此后郑州仍持续出现雾霾天气。本文比较了疫情管控前(2019年)、管控期间(2020年)和管控后(2021年)细颗粒物(PM)的离子组成和来源,以探究雾霾产生的原因。2020年和2021年PM的平均浓度分别较2019年的102.49 μg/m³下降了28.5%和27.9%。2019年二次无机气溶胶(SIAs)的浓度为51.87 μg/m³,2020年下降了3.1%,2021年下降了12.8%。相比之下,SIAs对PM的贡献率从2019年的50.61%增至2020年的68.6%和2021年的61.2%。2020 - 2021年期间,SIAs对PM浓度的影响显著。尽管2020 - 2021年期间一氧化氮(NO)水平下降了22% - 62%,但臭氧(O)增加导致2020 - 2021年的NO浓度(20.69 - 23.00 μg/m³)与2019年(22.93 μg/m³)相近,阻碍了郑州PM浓度的降低。利用正定矩阵因子分解模型在2019 - 2021年期间识别出了包括二次无机气溶胶、工业排放、煤炭燃烧、生物质燃烧、土壤扬尘和交通排放在内的6种PM来源。与2019年相比,2020年和202年二次气溶胶源的PM减少量较小,二次气溶胶对PM的贡献率在2020年增加了13.32%,在2021年增加了12.94%。相比之下,包括生物质燃烧、交通和扬尘在内的一次排放源在2020年减少了29.71%,在2021年减少了27.7%。结果表明,在新冠疫情管控期间及之后,二次生成对PM浓度下降的贡献并不显著。因此,了解在高O和低前驱气体条件下二次气溶胶的形成机制对于未来减轻空气污染至关重要。