O'Leary John, Georgeaux-Healy Chloé, Serpell Lucy
North East London NHS Foundation Trust, CEME Centre, West Wing Marsh Way, Rainham, Essex RM13 8GQ, UK.
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Nutr Rev. 2025 Jan 1;83(1):146-159. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad170.
Research into the effects of calorie restriction continues to intrigue those interested in whether it may allow humans to live longer and healthier lives. Animal studies of continuous calorie restriction (CCR) and fasting have demonstrated substantial advantages to health and longevity. However, concerns remain about the impact of restricting calorie intake on human health and cognition. Given the emerging evidence of cognitive impairments in eating disorders, studies investigating restricted calorie intake in healthy humans (in an ethical way) may also have implications for understanding restrictive eating disorders. In this review, the published literature on the impact of CCR and fasting on cognitive function in healthy human participants is synthesized. Of the 33 studies of CCR and fasting in humans identified, 23 demonstrated significant changes in cognition. Despite variation across the cognitive domains, results suggest CCR benefits inhibition, processing speed, and working memory, but may lead to impairments in cognitive flexibility. The results of fasting studies suggest fasting is associated with impairments in cognitive flexibility and psychomotor abilities. Overall, the results of these studies suggest the degree (ie, the severity) of calorie restriction is what most likely predicts cognitive improvements as opposed to impairments. For individuals engaging in sustained restriction, this may have serious, irreversible consequences. However, there are mixed findings regarding the impact of CCR and fasting on this aspect of human functioning, suggesting further research is required to understand the costs and benefits of different types of calorie restriction.
对热量限制影响的研究一直吸引着那些关注其是否能让人类活得更长久、更健康的人。对持续热量限制(CCR)和禁食的动物研究已证明对健康和长寿有显著益处。然而,限制热量摄入对人类健康和认知的影响仍存在担忧。鉴于饮食失调中认知障碍的新证据,以符合伦理的方式对健康人类进行的热量摄入限制研究,可能也有助于理解限制性饮食失调。在这篇综述中,综合了已发表的关于CCR和禁食对健康人类参与者认知功能影响的文献。在已确定的33项关于人类CCR和禁食的研究中,23项显示出认知方面的显著变化。尽管不同认知领域存在差异,但结果表明CCR有益于抑制、处理速度和工作记忆,但可能导致认知灵活性受损。禁食研究结果表明,禁食与认知灵活性和心理运动能力受损有关。总体而言,这些研究结果表明,热量限制的程度(即严重程度)最有可能预测认知改善而非损害。对于持续进行限制的个体,这可能会产生严重的、不可逆转的后果。然而,关于CCR和禁食对人类这一功能方面的影响存在不同的研究结果,这表明需要进一步研究以了解不同类型热量限制的成本和益处。