School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Wodonga, Victoria, Australia.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):1022-1037. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02828-9. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
Many tasks require precise synchronization with external sensory stimuli, such as driving a car. This study investigates whether combined visual-tactile information provides additional benefits to movement synchrony over separate visual and tactile stimuli and explores the relationship with the temporal binding window for multisensory integration. In Experiment 1, participants completed a sensorimotor synchronization task to examine movement variability and a simultaneity judgment task to measure the temporal binding window. Results showed similar synchronization variability between visual-tactile and tactile-only stimuli, but significantly lower than visual only. In Experiment 2, participants completed a visual-tactile sensorimotor synchronization task with cross-modal stimuli presented inside (stimulus onset asynchrony 80 ms) and outside (stimulus-onset asynchrony 400 ms) the temporal binding window to examine temporal accuracy of movement execution. Participants synchronized their movement with the first stimulus in the cross-modal pair, either the visual or tactile stimulus. Results showed significantly greater temporal accuracy when only one stimulus was presented inside the window and the second stimulus was outside the window than when both stimuli were presented inside the window, with movement execution being more accurate when attending to the tactile stimulus. Overall, these findings indicate there may be a modality-specific benefit to sensorimotor synchronization performance, such that tactile cues are weighted more strongly than visual information as tactile information is more intrinsically linked to motor timing than visual information. Further, our findings indicate that the visual-tactile temporal binding window is related to the temporal accuracy of movement execution.
许多任务都需要与外部感觉刺激精确同步,例如驾驶汽车。本研究旨在探讨视觉-触觉信息结合是否比单独的视觉和触觉刺激更能提高运动同步性,并探索其与多感觉整合的时间绑定窗口的关系。在实验 1 中,参与者完成了一个感觉运动同步任务来检查运动变异性,和一个同时性判断任务来测量时间绑定窗口。结果表明,视觉-触觉和仅触觉刺激的同步变异性相似,但明显低于仅视觉刺激。在实验 2 中,参与者完成了一个视觉-触觉感觉运动同步任务,其中跨模态刺激在时间绑定窗口内(刺激起始时相差 80 毫秒)和窗口外(刺激起始时相差 400 毫秒)呈现,以检查运动执行的时间准确性。参与者根据跨模态对中的第一个刺激(视觉或触觉刺激)来同步他们的运动。结果表明,当仅一个刺激在窗口内而第二个刺激在窗口外呈现时,运动执行的时间准确性显著更高,而当两个刺激都在窗口内呈现时,注意触觉刺激时运动执行更准确。总体而言,这些发现表明感觉运动同步性能可能存在特定于模态的优势,即触觉线索比视觉信息更受重视,因为触觉信息与运动时间的内在联系比视觉信息更紧密。此外,我们的发现表明视觉-触觉时间绑定窗口与运动执行的时间准确性有关。