Hardy Anthony, Benford Diane, Halldorsson Thorhallur, Jeger Michael John, Knutsen Helle Katrine, More Simon, Naegeli Hanspeter, Noteborn Hubert, Ockleford Colin, Ricci Antonia, Rychen Guido, Schlatter Josef R, Silano Vittorio, Solecki Roland, Turck Dominique, Benfenati Emilio, Chaudhry Qasim Mohammad, Craig Peter, Frampton Geoff, Greiner Matthias, Hart Andrew, Hogstrand Christer, Lambre Claude, Luttik Robert, Makowski David, Siani Alfonso, Wahlstroem Helene, Aguilera Jaime, Dorne Jean-Lou, Fernandez Dumont Antonio, Hempen Michaela, Valtueña Martínez Silvia, Martino Laura, Smeraldi Camilla, Terron Andrea, Georgiadis Nikolaos, Younes Maged
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 3;15(8):e04971. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4971. eCollection 2017 Aug.
EFSA requested the Scientific Committee to develop a guidance document on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments for use in all areas under EFSA's remit. The guidance document addresses the use of weight of evidence approaches in scientific assessments using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Several case studies covering the various areas under EFSA's remit are annexed to the guidance document to illustrate the applicability of the proposed approach. Weight of evidence assessment is defined in this guidance as a process in which evidence is integrated to determine the relative support for possible answers to a question. This document considers the weight of evidence assessment as comprising three basic steps: (1) assembling the evidence into lines of evidence of similar type, (2) weighing the evidence, (3) integrating the evidence. The present document identifies reliability, relevance and consistency as three basic considerations for weighing evidence.
欧洲食品安全局要求科学委员会制定一份关于在科学评估中使用证据权重方法的指导文件,供欧洲食品安全局职权范围内的所有领域使用。该指导文件阐述了在科学评估中使用定性和定量方法的证据权重方法。指导文件附录了几个涵盖欧洲食品安全局职权范围内各个领域的案例研究,以说明所提议方法的适用性。本指导文件将证据权重评估定义为一个整合证据以确定对问题可能答案的相对支持程度的过程。本文件认为证据权重评估包括三个基本步骤:(1)将证据整理成相似类型的证据链;(2)权衡证据;(3)整合证据。本文件确定可靠性、相关性和一致性为权衡证据的三个基本考量因素。