Department of Pediatric Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Imam Ali Hospital, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Jul;397(7):5233-5240. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-02954-7. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
Due to the limited number of studies in children with focal epilepsy and the importance of choosing the most suitable drug to control seizures in children, the administration of the most effective medication with the most negligible adverse events is vital. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse events of carbamazepine vs. levetiracetam monotherapy in children with focal seizures. A monocentric, randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial was designed. This study was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number: IRCT20170216032603N2) on June 19, 2020, and conducted at the neurology department of Imam Ali Hospital, Karaj, Iran, from February 2020 to March 2021. This study assessed 120 patients with recently diagnosed focal seizures aged 2 to 14. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, who received carbamazepine (CBZ) 15 to 20 mg/kg and levetiracetam (LEV) 20 to 40 mg/kg daily, respectively. Patients were evaluated for improvement and complications at weeks 4, 12, and 24. Out of 120 patients included in the study, six patients were excluded due to various complications of CBZ. The mean number of seizures at the end of the fourth, twelfth, and twenty-fourth weeks were 1.09 ± 0.75, 0.62 ± 0.27, and 0.39 ± 0.12 in the carbamazepine group and 1.11 ± 0.63, 0.52 ± 0.21, and 0.37 ± 0.11 in the LEV group, respectively (P > 0.05). Similarly, the number of seizure-free patients was 34, 44, and 48 in the CBZ group compared to 41, 50, and 54 in the LEV group, respectively (P > 0.05). On the other hand, the frequency of somnolence, dermatologic complications, and agitation was considerably higher in the CBZ group (P < 0.05). Although both medicines were equally effective in seizure control, CBZ was associated with considerably more adverse events and less patient compliance. Physicians should be aware of this difference to prevent unwanted consequences.
由于针对局灶性癫痫儿童的研究数量有限,以及为儿童选择最适合控制癫痫发作的药物的重要性,因此使用最有效的药物并将不良反应降至最低至关重要。本研究旨在评估卡马西平与左乙拉西坦单药治疗局灶性癫痫儿童的有效性和不良反应。设计了一项单中心、随机、对照、双盲、平行组临床试验。本研究于 2020 年 6 月 19 日获得伊朗临床试验注册中心(注册号:IRCT20170216032603N2)批准,并于 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 3 月在伊朗卡拉季的伊玛目阿里医院神经内科进行。本研究评估了 120 名最近诊断为局灶性癫痫的 2 至 14 岁患者。患者被随机分为两组,分别接受卡马西平(CBZ)15 至 20mg/kg 和左乙拉西坦(LEV)20 至 40mg/kg 每日治疗。在第 4、12 和 24 周评估患者的改善和并发症。在纳入研究的 120 名患者中,由于 CBZ 的各种并发症,有 6 名患者被排除。卡马西平组在第 4、12 和 24 周末的平均发作次数分别为 1.09±0.75、0.62±0.27 和 0.39±0.12,左乙拉西坦组分别为 1.11±0.63、0.52±0.21 和 0.37±0.11(P>0.05)。同样,卡马西平组无发作的患者分别为 34、44 和 48 例,左乙拉西坦组分别为 41、50 和 54 例(P>0.05)。另一方面,卡马西平组的嗜睡、皮肤并发症和激越的发生率明显更高(P<0.05)。虽然两种药物在控制癫痫发作方面同样有效,但卡马西平引起的不良反应明显更多,患者的依从性也更低。医生应该意识到这种差异,以防止出现不必要的后果。