Weber Sandra, Mascherek Anna, Augustin Jobst, Cheng Bastian, Thomalla Götz, Hoven Hanno, Harth Volker, Augustin Matthias, Gallinat Jürgen, Kühn Simone
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Institute of Health Care Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 10;14:1267900. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1267900. eCollection 2023.
Although people spend most of the day in their home environment, the focus of research in environmental psychology to date has been on factors outside the home. However, it stands to reason that indoor quality likewise has an impact on psychological well-being. Therefore, the present study addresses the question of whether the subjective evaluation of home environmental parameters are related to self-reported anxiety and whether they can additionally explain variance beyond the usual sociodemographic and general lifestyle variables.
Data from the Hamburg City Health Study (first 10,000 participants) was analyzed. A subsample of = 8,886 with available GAD-7 anxiety data was selected, and hierarchical regression models were computed, with demographic data entered first, followed by variables concerning lifestyle/habits and finally variables of the subjective evaluation of home environment.
Using the integrated model, we were able to explain about 13% of the variance in self-reported anxiety scores. This included both the demographic, lifestyle, and subjective evaluation of home environment variables. Protection from disturbing night lights, a greater sense of security, less disturbing noises, brighter accommodations, and a satisfactory window view explained almost 6% of the variance and was significantly associated with lower anxiety scores.
The home as a place of refuge plays an increasingly important role as home office hours rise. It is therefore crucial to identify domestic factors contributing to people's mental well-being. The subjective evaluation of one's home environment has proven influential over and above modifiable lifestyle variables.
尽管人们一天中的大部分时间都处于家庭环境中,但迄今为止,环境心理学的研究重点一直是家庭以外的因素。然而,室内环境质量同样会对心理健康产生影响,这是合乎情理的。因此,本研究探讨了家庭环境参数的主观评价是否与自我报告的焦虑有关,以及它们是否能在通常的社会人口统计学和一般生活方式变量之外额外解释方差。
对汉堡城市健康研究(首批10,000名参与者)的数据进行了分析。选取了一个n = 8,886的子样本,其具有可用的广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD - 7)焦虑数据,并计算了分层回归模型,首先输入人口统计学数据,其次是关于生活方式/习惯的变量,最后是家庭环境主观评价的变量。
使用综合模型,我们能够解释自我报告焦虑得分中方差的约13%。这包括人口统计学、生活方式以及家庭环境变量的主观评价。免受夜间干扰灯光、更强的安全感、更少的干扰噪音、更明亮的居住环境以及令人满意的窗外景色解释了近6%的方差,并且与较低的焦虑得分显著相关。
随着居家办公时间的增加,家作为一个避难所的作用日益重要。因此,识别有助于人们心理健康的家庭因素至关重要。事实证明,对家庭环境的主观评价在可改变的生活方式变量之外具有影响力。