Esdaile J M, Feinstein A R, Horwitz R I
Arch Intern Med. 1987 Mar;147(3):543-9.
The 1960s epidemic of asthma deaths that affected young persons in England and Wales, as well as in other countries, was attributed to the effect of newly available pressurized aerosols containing sympathomimetic bronchodilators. The subsequent decision to ban the nonprescription sale of these agents in the United Kingdom represented a unique use of national and international mortality data. The application of such data for decisions about therapeutic agents has implications for the current rise of asthma deaths in New Zealand, for the recent United States regulatory action regarding the nonprescription sale of aerosolized bronchodilators, and for the appraisal of adverse reactions to other pharmaceutical substances. This article is concerned with the quality of the scientific evidence used to implicate bronchodilators in the 1960s epidemic, and also with the strengths and weaknesses of the ecologic studies on which the implication depended. After concluding that the causal link between asthma deaths and bronchodilators was not supported by satisfactory scientific evidence, we present new data and an alternative diagnostic-exchange hypothesis that may, in part, help explain the original association.
20世纪60年代,在英格兰、威尔士以及其他国家出现了影响年轻人的哮喘死亡流行疫情,这被归因于当时新出现的含有拟交感神经支气管扩张剂的加压气雾剂的影响。随后,英国决定禁止这些药物的非处方销售,这是对国家和国际死亡率数据的独特运用。将此类数据用于有关治疗药物的决策,对新西兰目前哮喘死亡人数的上升、美国近期关于雾化支气管扩张剂非处方销售的监管行动以及对其他药物不良反应的评估都有影响。本文关注的是用于表明支气管扩张剂与20世纪60年代疫情有关的科学证据的质量,以及这种关联所依赖的生态学研究的优缺点。在得出哮喘死亡与支气管扩张剂之间的因果联系没有得到充分科学证据支持的结论后,我们展示了新的数据以及一个替代性的诊断转换假说,该假说可能在一定程度上有助于解释最初的关联。