Suppr超能文献

外周神经阻滞术后预防反弹痛:静脉内、神经周围地塞米松和对照的网络荟萃分析。

Rebound pain prevention after peripheral nerve block: A network meta-analysis comparing intravenous, perineural dexamethasone, and control.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Neurology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2024 Dec;99:111657. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111657. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are widely used for postoperative analgesia, but rebound pain following block resolution poses a significant clinical challenge. Dexamethasone, administered either intravenously (IV) or perineurally, has shown promise in reducing rebound pain incidence, but the optimal route remains unclear. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to compare the effectiveness of different routes of dexamethasone administration, including IV, perineural, and control, in reducing the incidence of rebound pain following PNBs.

DESIGN

Network meta-analysis.

SETTING

Operating room, postoperative recovery area and ward.

PATIENTS

Seven randomized controlled trials involving 561 patients undergoing peripheral nerve block for postoperative pain management.

INTERVENTIONS

Intravenous and perineural dexamethasone compared to control for preventing rebound pain.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the incidence of rebound pain. Secondary outcomes included median time to first analgesic request, rebound pain resolution time, difference in pain scores before and after PNB resolution, and nausea/vomiting.

MAIN RESULTS

Both IV and perineural dexamethasone significantly reduced the incidence of rebound pain following peripheral nerve blocks compared to the control group. IV dexamethasone ranked first based on P-score (OR, 0.13; 95 % CI, 0.07-0.23; P-score, 0.92). Secondary outcomes, including time to the first analgesic request, pain score difference, and nausea/vomiting, also favored both IV and perineural dexamethasone over the control group.

CONCLUSION

Both IV and perineural dexamethasone are preferred over no dexamethasone for preventing rebound pain after PNBs, with IV dexamethasone being the more effective route. Despite limitations, these findings provide valuable insights for clinical decision-making in postoperative pain management.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024530943.

摘要

研究目的

外周神经阻滞(PNB)广泛用于术后镇痛,但阻滞解除后出现的反弹痛是一个重大的临床挑战。静脉内(IV)或神经周围给予地塞米松已显示出降低反弹痛发生率的潜力,但最佳途径仍不清楚。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在比较不同途径给予地塞米松(包括 IV、神经周围和对照组)在降低 PNB 后反弹痛发生率方面的有效性。

设计

网络荟萃分析。

设置

手术室、术后恢复区和病房。

患者

7 项随机对照试验,涉及 561 例接受外周神经阻滞以管理术后疼痛的患者。

干预措施

IV 和神经周围地塞米松与对照组比较,预防反弹痛。

测量

主要结局是反弹痛的发生率。次要结局包括首次镇痛请求的中位时间、反弹痛缓解时间、PNB 解除前后疼痛评分的差异以及恶心/呕吐。

主要结果

IV 和神经周围地塞米松均显著降低了与对照组相比外周神经阻滞后反弹痛的发生率。IV 地塞米松基于 P 评分排名第一(OR,0.13;95%CI,0.07-0.23;P 评分,0.92)。次要结局,包括首次镇痛请求的时间、疼痛评分差异和恶心/呕吐,也优于对照组的 IV 和神经周围地塞米松。

结论

与不使用地塞米松相比,IV 和神经周围地塞米松均更适用于预防 PNB 后反弹痛,IV 地塞米松是更有效的途径。尽管存在局限性,但这些发现为术后疼痛管理的临床决策提供了有价值的见解。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42024530943。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验