Hydrogen Peroxide-Free Color Correctors for Tooth Whitening in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and Clinical Evidence.

The rising demand for aesthetic dental treatments has spurred interest in peroxide-free color correctors as alternatives to traditional hydrogen peroxide formulations, which are associated with tooth sensitivity and potential enamel demineralization. This systematic review evaluates the whitening efficacy and safety profile of hydrogen peroxide-free color corrector (HPFCC) products, focusing on color change metrics, enamel and dentin integrity, and adverse effects. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science throughout January 2025 for randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and in vitro experiments comparing HPFCC to placebo or peroxide-based agents. The data extraction covered study design, sample characteristics, intervention details, shade improvement (ΔE00 or CIE Lab), enamel/dentin mechanical properties (microhardness, roughness, elastic modulus), and incidence of sensitivity or tissue irritation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for clinical studies and the QUIN tool for in vitro research. Six studies ( = 20-80 samples or subjects) met the inclusion criteria. In vitro, HPFCC achieved mean ΔE00 values of 3.5 (bovine incisors; = 80) and 2.8 (human molars; = 20), versus up to 8.9 for carbamide peroxide ( < 0.01). Across studies, HPFCC achieved a mean ΔE00 of 2.8-3.5 surpassing the perceptibility threshold of 2.7 and approaching the clinical acceptability benchmark of 3.3. Surface microhardness increased by 12.9 ± 11.7 VHN with HPFCC ( < 0.001), and ultramicrohardness rose by 110 VHN over 56 days in prolonged use studies. No significant enamel erosion or dentin roughness changes were observed, and the sensitivity incidence remained below 3%. These findings derive from one clinical trial ( = 60) and five in vitro studies ( = 20-80), encompassing violet-pigment serums and gels with differing concentrations. Due to heterogeneity in designs, formulations, and outcome measures, we conducted a narrative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis. Although HPFCC ΔE00 values were lower than those of carbamide peroxide, they consistently exceeded perceptibility thresholds while maintaining enamel integrity and causing sensitivity in fewer than 3% of subjects, supporting HPFCCs as moderate but safe alternatives for young patients.