Suppr超能文献

口腔刷检联合液基细胞学检查用于口腔癌筛查的可靠性评价:一种基于成本效用的分析

Oral brush biopsy using liquid-based cytology is a reliable tool for oral cancer screening: A cost-utility analysis: Oral brush biopsy for oral cancer screening.

机构信息

University of Western Australia Dental School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Australian Centre for Oral Oncology Research and Education, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Sep;130(9):740-748. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22599. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility and associated cost of oral liquid-based brush cytology (OLBC) in the diagnosis of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs).

METHODS

A total of 284 patients with oral mucosal lesions were included. OLBC samples were collected from all patients immediately before undergoing surgical biopsies. A liquid-based cytology slide was prepared from each OLBC sample for cytological evaluation using the modified 2014 Bethesda cytology system. The results and the cost were compared with the histopathological outcomes.

RESULTS

The level of agreement between the two approaches was very good (weighted kappa = 0.824). The accuracy of OLBC in differentiating between the different diagnostic groups was 91.69%, whereas the associated sensitivity and specificity were 79.23% and 94.81%, respectively. The estimated cost of each OLBC sample was at least 26% less than the cost of a single biopsy and more than 42% less in cases of multiple biopsied lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed modifications of the Bethesda system can be adopted as a standardized system for oral cytological assessment. Our findings support OLBC as a reliable adjunct to surgical biopsy in the diagnosis of OPMDs. This tool has potential for oral cancer-finding and surveillance programs.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估口腔液基毛刷细胞学(OLBC)在口腔癌和口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMDs)诊断中的诊断效用和相关成本。

方法

共纳入 284 例口腔黏膜病变患者。所有患者均在接受手术活检前立即采集 OLBC 样本。每份 OLBC 样本均制备液体基细胞学载玻片,使用改良的 2014 年巴氏细胞学系统进行细胞学评估。将结果和成本与组织病理学结果进行比较。

结果

两种方法之间的一致性非常好(加权 Kappa=0.824)。OLBC 区分不同诊断组的准确性为 91.69%,而相关的敏感性和特异性分别为 79.23%和 94.81%。每份 OLBC 样本的估计成本至少比单次活检低 26%,在多个活检病变的情况下则至少低 42%。

结论

可以采用改良的巴氏系统作为口腔细胞学评估的标准化系统。我们的研究结果支持 OLBC 作为 OPMDs 诊断中手术活检的可靠辅助手段。该工具在口腔癌筛查和监测计划中有应用潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c35a/9544877/f9f3d2a4e90a/CNCY-130-740-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验