• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可以使用构建的图计量学来预测医疗技术的影响。

Impact of medical technologies may be predicted using constructed graph bibliometrics.

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):2419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52233-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-52233-x
PMID:38287044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10824713/
Abstract

Scientific research is driven by allocation of funding to different research projects based in part on the predicted scientific impact of the work. Data-driven algorithms can inform decision-making of scarce funding resources by identifying likely high-impact studies using bibliometrics. Compared to standardized citation-based metrics alone, we utilize a machine learning pipeline that analyzes high-dimensional relationships among a range of bibliometric features to improve the accuracy of predicting high-impact research. Random forest classification models were trained using 28 bibliometric features calculated from a dataset of 1,485,958 publications in medicine to retrospectively predict whether a publication would become high-impact. For each random forest model, the balanced accuracy score was above 0.95 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was above 0.99. The high performance of high impact research prediction using our proposed models show that machine learning technologies are promising algorithms that can support funding decision-making for medical research.

摘要

科学研究是通过将资金分配给不同的研究项目来推动的,部分依据是工作的预期科学影响。数据驱动的算法可以通过使用文献计量学识别可能具有高影响力的研究,为稀缺资金资源的决策提供信息。与仅基于标准化引文计量指标相比,我们利用机器学习管道来分析一系列文献计量特征之间的高维关系,以提高预测高影响力研究的准确性。使用从医学领域 1,485,958 篇出版物的数据集中计算的 28 个文献计量特征,对随机森林分类模型进行了训练,以回顾性地预测一项出版物是否具有高影响力。对于每个随机森林模型,平衡准确性得分均高于 0.95,接收者操作特征曲线下的面积均高于 0.99。我们提出的模型对高影响力研究预测的出色表现表明,机器学习技术是一种很有前途的算法,可以为医学研究的资金决策提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ef/10824713/67c55fd33674/41598_2024_52233_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ef/10824713/bb3ff6c93cf0/41598_2024_52233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ef/10824713/f08a11ba3f93/41598_2024_52233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ef/10824713/446ce343d6fb/41598_2024_52233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ef/10824713/67c55fd33674/41598_2024_52233_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ef/10824713/bb3ff6c93cf0/41598_2024_52233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ef/10824713/f08a11ba3f93/41598_2024_52233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ef/10824713/446ce343d6fb/41598_2024_52233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ef/10824713/67c55fd33674/41598_2024_52233_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of medical technologies may be predicted using constructed graph bibliometrics.可以使用构建的图计量学来预测医疗技术的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):2419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52233-x.
2
What predicts citation counts and translational impact in headache research? A machine learning analysis.什么因素可以预测头痛研究的引用次数和转化影响力?一项机器学习分析。
Cephalalgia. 2024 May;44(5):3331024241251488. doi: 10.1177/03331024241251488.
3
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
4
Automatic identification of high impact articles in PubMed to support clinical decision making.在PubMed中自动识别高影响力文章以支持临床决策。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Sep;73:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
5
Machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality in Ethiopia.用于预测埃塞俄比亚 COVID-19 死亡率的机器学习算法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):1728. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19196-0.
6
Scholarly Productivity Evaluation of KL2 Scholars Using Bibliometrics and Federal Follow-on Funding: Cross-Institution Study.使用文献计量学和联邦后续资助评估 KL2 学者的学术产出:跨机构研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 29;23(9):e29239. doi: 10.2196/29239.
7
Construction of a predictive model for radiation proctitis after radiotherapy for female pelvic tumors based on machine learning.基于机器学习构建女性盆腔肿瘤放疗后放射性直肠炎预测模型。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Aug 28;47(8):1065-1074. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.220353.
8
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
9
Learning on knowledge graph dynamics provides an early warning of impactful research.从知识图谱动态中学习可对有影响力的研究提供预警。
Nat Biotechnol. 2021 Oct;39(10):1300-1307. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00907-6. Epub 2021 May 17.
10
Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?机器学习算法能否预测丹麦膝关节置换登记处的早期翻修 TKA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2088-2101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001343.

本文引用的文献

1
Open Data: Implications on Privacy in Healthcare Research.开放数据:对医疗保健研究中隐私的影响。
Blockchain Healthc Today. 2020 Sep 18;3. doi: 10.30953/bhty.v3.144. eCollection 2020.
2
Federal Funding and Citation Metrics of US Biomedical Researchers, 1996 to 2022.1996 年至 2022 年美国生物医学研究人员的联邦资金和引文计量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2245590. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45590.
3
Toward better drug discovery with knowledge graph.基于知识图谱的药物发现研究进展
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2022 Feb;72:114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Learning on knowledge graph dynamics provides an early warning of impactful research.从知识图谱动态中学习可对有影响力的研究提供预警。
Nat Biotechnol. 2021 Oct;39(10):1300-1307. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00907-6. Epub 2021 May 17.
5
Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis.高影响力医学期刊发表的随机试验相关文章的全球绘制:一项横断面分析。
Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3944-9.
6
A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field.标准化引文计量作者数据库,标注了科学领域。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Aug 12;17(8):e3000384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384. eCollection 2019 Aug.
7
node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks.节点2向量:网络的可扩展特征学习
KDD. 2016 Aug;2016:855-864. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939754.
8
Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery.研究资金:改良型抽签的理由
mBio. 2016 Apr 12;7(2):e00422-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00422-16.
9
Estimates of the continuously publishing core in the scientific workforce.科学工作队伍中持续发表成果的核心人员的估计数。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 9;9(7):e101698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101698. eCollection 2014.
10
Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: a mixed methods approach.开发一种评估研究资助资金影响的方法:一种混合方法。
Eval Program Plann. 2014 Apr;43:105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 26.