Department of Health Management, School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jan 30;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02110-w.
The aim of this study was to examine the Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) vaccine policies disparities and effectiveness in Germany, Denmark and Bulgaria, with a view to providing lessons for global vaccination and response to possible outbreak risks.
This study analyzed big data through public information on the official websites of the Ministries of Health of the European Union, Germany, Denmark and Bulgaria and the official websites of the World Health Organization. We systematically summarized the COVID-19 vaccine policies of the three countries, and selected the following six indicators for cross-cutting vaccination comparisons: COVID-19 vaccine doses administered per 100 people, COVID-19 vaccination rate, the share of people with fully vaccinated, the share of people only partly vaccinated, cumulative confirmed COVID-19 cases per million, cumulative confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million. Meanwhile, we selected the following four indicators for measuring the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine policy implementation: daily cases per million, daily deaths per million, the effective reproduction rate (Rt), the moving-average case fatality rate (CFR).
Although these three EU countries had the same start time for vaccination, and the COVID-19 vaccine supply was coordinated by the EU, there are still differences in vaccination priorities, vaccination types, and vaccine appointment methods. Compared to Germany and Denmark, Bulgaria had the least efficient vaccination efforts and the worst vaccination coverage, with a vaccination rate of just over 30% as of June 2023, and the maximum daily deaths per million since vaccination began in the country was more than three times that of the other two countries. From the perspective of implementation effect, vaccination has a certain effect on reducing infection rate and death rate, but the spread of new mutant strains obviously aggravates the severity of the epidemic and reduces the effectiveness of the vaccine. Among them, the spread of the Omicron mutant strain had the most serious impact on the three countries, showing an obvious epidemic peak.
Expanding vaccination coverage has played a positive role in reducing COVID-19 infection and mortality rates and stabilizing Rt. Priority vaccination strategies targeting older people and at-risk groups have been shown to be effective in reducing COVID-19 case severity and mortality in the population. However, the emergence and spread of new variant strains, and the relaxation of epidemic prevention policies, still led to multiple outbreaks peaking. In addition, vaccine hesitancy, mistrust in government and ill-prepared health systems are hampering vaccination efforts. Among the notable ones are divergent types of responses to vaccine safety issue could fuel mistrust and hesitancy around vaccination. At this stage, it is also necessary to continue to include COVID-19 vaccination in priority vaccination plans and promote booster vaccination to prevent severe illness and death. Improving the fairness of vaccine distribution and reducing the degree of vaccine hesitancy are the focus of future vaccination work.
本研究旨在探讨德国、丹麦和保加利亚在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗政策方面的差异和效果,以期为全球疫苗接种和应对可能的疫情风险提供经验教训。
本研究通过欧盟、德国、丹麦和保加利亚卫生部官方网站和世界卫生组织官方网站的公共信息,对大数据进行分析。我们系统地总结了三国的 COVID-19 疫苗政策,并选择了以下六个交叉疫苗比较指标:每 100 人接种的 COVID-19 疫苗剂量、COVID-19 疫苗接种率、完全接种人群比例、部分接种人群比例、每百万人累积确诊 COVID-19 病例数、每百万人累积确诊 COVID-19 死亡数。同时,我们选择了以下四个指标来衡量 COVID-19 疫苗政策实施的效果:每百万人每日新增病例数、每百万人每日新增死亡数、有效繁殖率(Rt)、移动平均病死率(CFR)。
尽管这三个欧盟国家的疫苗接种开始时间相同,且 COVID-19 疫苗供应由欧盟协调,但在疫苗接种优先级、接种类型和疫苗预约方式上仍存在差异。与德国和丹麦相比,保加利亚的疫苗接种工作效率最低,接种覆盖率最差,截至 2023 年 6 月,接种率仅略高于 30%,自该国开始接种疫苗以来,每日每百万人最高死亡人数是其他两个国家的三倍多。从实施效果来看,接种疫苗对降低感染率和死亡率有一定作用,但新变异株的传播明显加重了疫情的严重程度,降低了疫苗的效果。其中,Omicron 变异株的传播对三国的影响最为严重,出现了明显的疫情高峰。
扩大疫苗接种覆盖率对降低 COVID-19 感染率和死亡率、稳定 Rt 发挥了积极作用。针对老年人和高危人群的优先接种策略,已被证明可有效降低人群中 COVID-19 病例的严重程度和死亡率。然而,新变异株的出现和传播,以及防疫政策的放松,仍导致多次疫情高峰。此外,疫苗犹豫、对政府的不信任和准备不足的卫生系统阻碍了疫苗接种工作。其中,对疫苗安全问题的不同反应类型可能会加剧对疫苗接种的不信任和犹豫。现阶段,还需要继续将 COVID-19 疫苗纳入优先接种计划,并推广加强针接种,以预防重症和死亡。改善疫苗分配公平性,降低疫苗犹豫程度,是未来疫苗接种工作的重点。