Suppr超能文献

白芍总苷联合雷公藤多苷治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效:一项多中心、开放性、随机对照临床试验。

Efficacy of adalimumab combined with Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F in the treatment of patient with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter, open-label, randomized-controlled trial.

机构信息

Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.

出版信息

Int J Rheum Dis. 2024 Jan;27(1):e15031. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.15031.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) combined with Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF) in the treatment of methotrexate (MTX)-inadequate response patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial, 64 RA patients with inadequate response to MTX were 1:1 randomly assigned into treatment or control groups. The treatment group was treated with ADA in combination with TwHF, and the control group was treated with ADA in combination with MTX for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients having low disease activity (2.6 ≤ DAS28-ESR < 3.2) and remission rates (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) at week 24.

RESULTS

In total, 53 of the 64 patients (82.8%) completed this 24-week clinical trial. By intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, a comparable outcome was observed between the two groups. The percentage of patients achieving low disease activity in the treatment group and control group were 43.8% and 46.9% (95% CI, 21.28 to 27.48, p = .802). Percentage of patients achieving low disease activity rates were respectively 28.1% and 31.3% in the treatment group and control group (95% CI, 19.18 to 25.58, p = .784). In per-protocol (PP) analysis, the results were consistent with the ITT model. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between ADA combined with TwHF versus ADA combined with MTX in the treatment of RA. TwHF might be an alternative treatment for RA patients who are intolerant to MTX.

摘要

目的

评估阿达木单抗(ADA)联合雷公藤多苷(TwHF)治疗甲氨蝶呤(MTX)应答不足的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

本多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验将 64 例对 MTX 应答不足的 RA 患者按 1:1 随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组接受 ADA 联合 TwHF 治疗,对照组接受 ADA 联合 MTX 治疗 24 周。主要终点为第 24 周时低疾病活动度(2.6≤DAS28-ESR<3.2)和缓解率(DAS28-ESR<2.6)的患者比例。

结果

共有 64 例患者中的 53 例(82.8%)完成了这项 24 周的临床试验。根据意向治疗(ITT)分析,两组的结果相当。治疗组和对照组低疾病活动度的患者比例分别为 43.8%和 46.9%(95%CI,21.28 至 27.48,p=0.802)。治疗组和对照组低疾病活动度的患者比例分别为 28.1%和 31.3%(95%CI,19.18 至 25.58,p=0.784)。在符合方案(PP)分析中,结果与 ITT 模型一致。两组不良反应发生率相当。

结论

ADA 联合 TwHF 与 ADA 联合 MTX 治疗 RA 的疗效和安全性无显著差异。TwHF 可能是对 MTX 不耐受的 RA 患者的另一种治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验