College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
School of Social Work, San Jose State University, San Jose, USA.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024 May;43(4):848-852. doi: 10.1111/dar.13811. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
Evaluations of alcohol environmental prevention efforts examine short-term effects of these interventions on alcohol-related problems. We examine whether the effects of the Sacramento Neighborhood Alcohol Prevention Project (SNAPP), an alcohol environmental intervention aimed to reduce alcohol-related problems in two neighbourhoods, on child abuse and neglect remained 7 years post-implementation.
SNAPP used a quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design, where intervention activities occurred in the South area, followed by those in the North area 2 years later. Our sample size is 3912 space-time units (326 census block groups × 12 years [1999-2010]). Outcomes were measured at the household level and included: (i) all foster care entries total; and (ii) the subset of foster care entries that were alcohol related. Data were analysed using Bayesian conditionally autoregressive space-time models.
We find that the decreases in total (relative rate [RR] = 0.882, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.795, 0.980) and alcohol-related (RR = 0.888, 95% CrI 0.791, 0.997) foster care entries remain in the North intervention area although the magnitude of those changes are smaller than immediately post-intervention. Increases found in alcohol-related foster care entries in the South area immediately post-intervention were not significant 7 years later (RR = 1.128, 95% CrI 0.975, 1.307).
Reductions in child abuse and neglect due to an alcohol environmental intervention can be maintained. Environmental interventions that provide community-level primary prevention strategies could be more easily sustained and more cost effective than individual-level interventions, although more research is needed to identify why interventions may be successful in specific contexts and not others.
评估酒精环境预防措施的效果,考察这些干预措施对与酒精相关问题的短期影响。我们研究了旨在减少两个社区与酒精相关问题的萨克拉门托邻里酒精预防项目(SNAPP)的效果,在实施 7 年后,对虐待和忽视儿童的影响是否仍然存在。
SNAPP 使用了一种准实验非等效对照组设计,干预活动首先在南区进行,然后在 2 年后在北区进行。我们的样本量为 3912 个时空单位(326 个普查街区组×12 年[1999-2010])。结果在家庭层面上进行测量,包括:(i)所有寄养入口总数;以及(ii)与酒精相关的寄养入口子集。数据使用贝叶斯条件自回归时空模型进行分析。
我们发现,在北区干预区,总寄养入口(相对比率[RR] = 0.882,95%置信区间[CrI] 0.795,0.980)和与酒精相关的寄养入口(RR = 0.888,95% CrI 0.791,0.997)的减少仍然存在,尽管这些变化的幅度比干预后立即减少的幅度要小。干预后南区与酒精相关的寄养入口增加在 7 年后不再显著(RR = 1.128,95% CrI 0.975,1.307)。
由于酒精环境干预而减少的虐待和忽视儿童的情况可以维持。提供社区一级初级预防策略的环境干预措施可能比个人一级的干预措施更容易持续和更具成本效益,尽管需要更多的研究来确定为什么干预措施在某些情况下可能成功,而在其他情况下则不成功。