• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用矢状劈开钢板(SSOP)与两块微型钢板治疗角部骨折固定的稳定性及临床结果:随机临床试验

Stability and Clinical Outcomes of Angle Fracture Fixation Using Sagittal Split Plate (SSOP) Versus Two Miniplates: Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

El-Sherif Hagar M, Ali Sherif, Talaat Mostafa, Mubarak Fahmy

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Nasser Institute Hospital for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Feb;23(1):107-113. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01817-z. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1007/s12663-022-01817-z
PMID:38312972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10830940/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the stability and clinical outcomes between the two miniplates and sagittal split plate (SSOP) in angle fracture fixation. Thirty-eight patients with a mandibular angle fracture were selected and divided randomly into two groups. Intervention was treated with SSOP, and the control group was treated with conventional two miniplates. Clinical evaluation included occlusion, edema, nerve affection, wound dehiscence and mouth opening. Radiographic parameters included the measurement of inter-ramus distance, inter-mental distance and bone density. All clinical parameters were evaluated at one week, one month and three months intervals. Radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately postoperative, and after three months. Results showed that SSOP had less postoperative complications (10.50%) than the two miniplates (31.60%). It can be concluded that both methods offered high performance in management of mandibular angle fractures. However, SSOP group had a significantly shorter operating time, increased bone density and less edema. : NCT03839368.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种微型钢板与矢状劈开钢板(SSOP)在治疗下颌角骨折时的稳定性和临床疗效。选取38例下颌角骨折患者,随机分为两组。干预组采用SSOP治疗,对照组采用传统的两块微型钢板治疗。临床评估包括咬合、水肿、神经损伤、伤口裂开和开口度。影像学参数包括下颌支间距、颏部间距和骨密度的测量。所有临床参数在术后1周、1个月和3个月时进行评估。影像学参数在术后即刻和术后3个月时进行评估。结果显示,SSOP术后并发症(10.50%)少于两块微型钢板(31.60%)。可以得出结论,两种方法在治疗下颌角骨折方面均表现良好。然而,SSOP组手术时间明显更短,骨密度增加,水肿更少。:NCT03839368

相似文献

1
Stability and Clinical Outcomes of Angle Fracture Fixation Using Sagittal Split Plate (SSOP) Versus Two Miniplates: Randomized Clinical Trial.使用矢状劈开钢板(SSOP)与两块微型钢板治疗角部骨折固定的稳定性及临床结果:随机临床试验
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Feb;23(1):107-113. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01817-z. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
2
Three-dimensional v/s standard titanium miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures--a randomized clinical study.三维与标准钛微型钢板固定治疗下颌骨骨折的随机临床研究
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;42(7):1292-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
3
Z-shaped Miniplates vs Conventional Miniplates for Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.Z 形微型钢板与传统微型钢板固定下颌正中联合骨折的比较。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Oct 1;24(10):761-770. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3578.
4
Comparison of bite force evaluation for mandibular angle fracture fixation by conventional miniplates versus new design miniplates: a clinical study.对比常规微型板与新型微型板固定下颌角骨折时的咬合力评估:一项临床研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;28(2):645-652. doi: 10.1007/s10006-023-01182-2. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
5
Evaluation of condylar position in anterior mandibular fractures using 3 dimensional miniplate osteosynthesis versus conventional miniplates: Randomized clinical trial.三维微型板骨内固定与传统微型板治疗下颌骨前骨折髁突位置的评估:随机临床试验。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan;50(1):61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
6
"A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study.“单皮质非压缩钛小型接骨板与三维钛小型接骨板治疗下颌角骨折的对比评价”——一项随机前瞻性研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
7
The Stability Evaluation of Two Internal Fixation Patterns of Extracapsular Condylar Fracture Based on One Novel Measuring Method.基于一种新型测量方法评估两种髁突颈骨折内固定方式的稳定性。
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Nov/Dec;31(8):e793-e796. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006751.
8
Evaluation of two internal fixation techniques for mandibular parasymphyseal fractures comparing conventional titanium miniplates with customised titanium CRB omega miniplates: a prospective study.比较传统钛微型钢板与定制钛CRB欧米茄微型钢板治疗下颌骨髁突旁骨折的两种内固定技术的评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul;56(6):520-524. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 28.
9
Assessment of CAD/CAM Customized V Pattern Plate Versus Standard Miniplates Fixation in Mandibular Angle Fracture (Randomized Clinical Trial).计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造定制V形接骨板与标准微型接骨板在下颌角骨折固定中的评估(随机临床试验)
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Dec;22(4):995-1005. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-02027-x. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
10
A Comparative Assessment of the Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures Using 3D Plates and 2D Miniplates.使用三维接骨板和二维微型接骨板治疗下颌角骨折的比较评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):400-403.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study.下颌角骨折中二维微型钢板与三维微型钢板固定的比较评估——一项临床研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;31(1):134-137. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_885_19.
2
Maxillofacial Fracture Patterns in Road Traffic Accidents.道路交通事故中的颌面骨折类型
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul-Dec;9(2):345-348. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_136_19.
3
Retrospective Analysis of 162 Mandibular Fractures: An Institutional Experience.162例下颌骨骨折的回顾性分析:机构经验
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;9(1):124-128. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_36_18.
4
No differences in infections between patient-specific implants and conventional mini-plates in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy - Up to 3-year follow-up.患者特异性植入物与传统微型钢板在下颌双侧矢状劈开截骨术中的感染无差异 - 长达 3 年的随访。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Aug;47(8):1181-1184. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
5
The "European Mandibular Angle" Research Project: The Epidemiologic Results From a Multicenter European Collaboration.“欧洲下颌角”研究项目:一项欧洲多中心合作的流行病学结果。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;77(4):791.e1-791.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.12.013. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
Complication rate in mandibular angle fractures-one vs. two plates: a 12-year retrospective analysis.下颌角骨折的并发症发生率——单钢板与双钢板:一项12年的回顾性分析。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;22(4):435-441. doi: 10.1007/s10006-018-0728-4. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Postoperative Complications Associated With Different Fixation Methods of Isolated Mandibular Angle Fractures.
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Sep;29(6):1569-1573. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004484.
8
Open Reduction with Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures: A Retrospective Study.下颌角骨折切开复位内固定术:一项回顾性研究。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2017 Jan;82:h3.
9
One miniplate compared with two in the fixation of isolated fractures of the mandibular angle.在下颌角孤立骨折的固定中,使用一块微型钢板与使用两块相比。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Oct;53(8):690-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
10
What method for management of unilateral mandibular angle fractures has the lowest rate of postoperative complications? A systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗单侧下颌角骨折的哪种方法术后并发症发生率最低?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov;72(11):2197-211. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.023. Epub 2014 May 29.