Suppr超能文献

影响责任医疗组织在遵循成功路径后决定继续留在或退出医疗保险共享节约计划的因素。

Factors affecting Accountable Care Organizations' decisions to remain in or exit the Medicare Shared Savings Program following Pathways to Success.

作者信息

Ying Meiling, Forman Jane H, Murali Sitara, Gauntlett Lauren E, Krein Sarah L, Hollenbeck Brent K, Hollingsworth John M

机构信息

Department of Foundations of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY 11501, United States.

Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States.

出版信息

Health Aff Sch. 2024 Jan 5;2(1):qxad093. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad093. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

The Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) is an alternative payment model launched in 2012, creating Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to improve quality and lower costs for Traditional Medicare patients. Most MSSP participants were expected to shift from bearing no financial risk to a 2-sided risk model (ie, bonus if spending reduced below historical benchmarks, penalty if not), yet fewer than 20% did. Therefore, in 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services launched the Pathways to Success program, which required shifting to a 2-sided model within 12 months. For the first time, more ACOs exited than entered the MSSP. To understand these participation decisions, we conducted qualitative interviews with ACO leaders. Pathways caused ACOs to reassess their potential shared savings vs losses, particularly in light of benchmarking methodology changes; reconsider perceived nonrevenue benefits; and reassess participation in the MSSP vs other programs. As ACOs, particularly those assuming downside risk, have contained costs and enhanced care quality, policymakers should strive to improve MSSP enrollment rates in downside-risk models through strategies that allow ACOs to achieve shared savings and deliver accountable care.

摘要

医疗保险共同储蓄计划(MSSP)是2012年推出的一种替代支付模式,创建了 accountable care organizations(ACOs),以提高传统医疗保险患者的质量并降低成本。大多数MSSP参与者预计将从不承担财务风险转变为双边风险模式(即,如果支出低于历史基准则获得奖金,如果未达到则受到惩罚),但实际转变的比例不到20%。因此,2019年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心推出了“成功之路”计划,要求在12个月内转向双边模式。首次出现了退出MSSP的ACO数量超过加入的情况。为了理解这些参与决策,我们对ACO负责人进行了定性访谈。“成功之路”计划促使ACO重新评估其潜在的共享储蓄与损失,特别是鉴于基准方法的变化;重新考虑感知到的非收入利益;并重新评估参与MSSP与其他计划的情况。由于ACO,特别是那些承担下行风险的ACO,已经控制了成本并提高了护理质量,政策制定者应努力通过使ACO能够实现共享储蓄并提供可问责护理的策略,提高下行风险模式下MSSP的参保率。

相似文献

4
Statistical uncertainty in the Medicare shared savings program.医疗保险共同节约计划中的统计不确定性。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012 Dec 28;2(4). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a04. eCollection 2012.

本文引用的文献

2
Predicting Losses from Medicare Shared Savings Program Departures.预测医疗保险共同储蓄计划退出所带来的损失。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2490-2491. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06424-7. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Rigour in qualitative case-study research.定性案例研究中的严谨性。
Nurse Res. 2013 Mar;20(4):12-7. doi: 10.7748/nr2013.03.20.4.12.e326.
7
Whatever happened to qualitative description?定性描述怎么了?
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验