• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术诊断错误的特征和促成因素:对加拿大封闭医疗法律案件和投诉的分析。

Characteristics and contributing factors of diagnostic error in surgery: analysis of closed medico-legal cases and complaints in Canada.

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine, Sinai Health and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Kwan); Safe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ont. (Calder, Bowman, MacIntyre, Mimeault, Honey, Dunn, Garber); the Department of Emergency Medicine and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Calder); the Canadian Association of General Surgeons, Kanata, Ont. (Mimeault); the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queensway Carleton Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Honey); the Department of Medicine and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Garber); Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Singh); and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA (Singh).

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2024 Feb 6;67(1):E58-E65. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003523. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.

DOI:10.1503/cjs.003523
PMID:38320779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10852193/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic errors lead to patient harm; however, most research has been conducted in nonsurgical disciplines. We sought to characterize diagnostic error in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative surgical phases, describe their contributing factors, and quantify their impact related to patient harm.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of closed medico-legal cases and complaints using a database representing more than 95% of all Canadian physicians. We included cases if they involved a legal action or complaint that closed between 2014 and 2018 and involved a diagnostic error assigned by peer expert review to a surgeon.

RESULTS

We identified 387 surgical cases that involved a diagnostic error. The surgical specialties most often associated with diagnostic error were general surgery ( = 151, 39.0%), gynecology ( = 71, 18.3%), and orthopedic surgery ( = 48, 12.4%), but most surgical specialties were represented. Errors occurred more often in the postoperative phase ( = 171, 44.2%) than in the pre- ( = 127, 32.8%) or intra-operative ( = 120, 31.0%) phases of surgical care. More than 80% of the contributing factors for diagnostic errors were related to providers, with clinical decision-making being the principal contributing factor. Half of the contributing factors were related to the health care team ( = 194, 50.1%), the most common of which was communication breakdown. More than half of patients involved in a surgical diagnostic error experienced at least moderate harm, with 1 in 7 cases resulting in death.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, diagnostic errors occurred in most surgical disciplines and across all surgical phases of care; contributing factors were commonly attributed to provider clinical decision-making and communication breakdown. Surgical patient safety efforts should include diagnostic errors with a focus on understanding and reducing errors in surgical clinical decision-making and improving communication.

摘要

背景

诊断错误会导致患者受到伤害;然而,大多数研究都集中在非外科领域。我们试图描述手术前、手术中和手术后阶段的诊断错误,描述其促成因素,并量化与患者伤害相关的影响。

方法

我们使用代表超过 95%的加拿大医生的数据库,对已结案的医学法律案例和投诉进行回顾性分析。如果案例涉及法律诉讼或投诉,且由同行专家审查归因于外科医生的诊断错误,并在 2014 年至 2018 年期间结案,则将其纳入研究。

结果

我们确定了 387 例涉及诊断错误的手术案例。最常与诊断错误相关的外科专业是普通外科(= 151,39.0%)、妇科(= 71,18.3%)和骨科(= 48,12.4%),但大多数外科专业都有涉及。错误更常发生在手术后期(= 171,44.2%),而不是手术前期(= 127,32.8%)或手术期(= 120,31.0%)。导致诊断错误的促成因素中,超过 80%与医务人员有关,临床决策是主要的促成因素。有一半的促成因素与医疗团队有关(= 194,50.1%),其中最常见的是沟通中断。涉及外科诊断错误的患者中,超过一半至少经历了中度伤害,每 7 例中就有 1 例导致死亡。

结论

在我们的队列中,诊断错误发生在大多数外科专业和所有手术护理阶段;促成因素通常归因于医务人员的临床决策和沟通中断。外科患者安全工作应包括诊断错误,并侧重于了解和减少外科临床决策中的错误,以及改善沟通。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and contributing factors of diagnostic error in surgery: analysis of closed medico-legal cases and complaints in Canada.手术诊断错误的特征和促成因素:对加拿大封闭医疗法律案件和投诉的分析。
Can J Surg. 2024 Feb 6;67(1):E58-E65. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003523. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
2
Promoting Best Practices in Assisted Human Reproduction.推广辅助生殖最佳实践。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2023 Sep;45(9):661-664. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
Trends and Contributing Factors in Medicolegal Cases Involving Spine Surgery.脊柱外科相关医事法律案件的趋势和影响因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 1;47(11):E469-E476. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004332. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
Medico-legal risk of infectious disease physicians in Canada: A retrospective review.加拿大传染病医生面临的法医学风险:一项回顾性研究。
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2024 Jan 16;8(4):319-327. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2023-0022. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Medico-Legal Complaints Against Dermatologists: Data From the Canadian Medical Protective Association, 2013 to 2022.针对皮肤科医生的医学法律投诉:来自加拿大医疗保护协会的 2013 年至 2022 年的数据。
J Cutan Med Surg. 2024 Nov-Dec;28(6):554-560. doi: 10.1177/12034754241275989. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
6
Patterns and trends among physicians-in-training named in civil legal cases: a retrospective analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association data from 1993 to 2017.培训医师在民事诉讼中被点名的模式和趋势:对 1993 年至 2017 年加拿大医疗保护协会数据的回顾性分析。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Sep 13;10(3):E781-E788. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220075. Print 2022 Jul-Sep.
7
Beyond medical errors: exploring the interpersonal dynamics in physician-patient relationships linked to medico-legal complaints.超越医疗差错:探索与医疗法律投诉相关的医患关系中的人际动态。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11457-3.
8
Medico-legal risks of point-of-care ultrasound: a closed-case analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association medico-legal cases.床旁超声的法医学风险:加拿大医疗保护协会法医学案例的结案分析
Ultrasound J. 2024 Feb 23;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00364-7.
9
Patterns of technical error among surgical malpractice claims: an analysis of strategies to prevent injury to surgical patients.外科医疗事故索赔中的技术失误模式:预防手术患者受伤的策略分析
Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):705-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815865f8.
10
The impact of system and diagnostic errors for medical litigation outcomes in orthopedic surgery.系统和诊断错误对骨科手术医疗诉讼结果的影响。
J Orthop Sci. 2023 Mar;28(2):484-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: fundamentals, current applications, and future perspectives.骨科中的人工智能:基础、当前应用及未来展望。
Mil Med Res. 2025 Aug 4;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00633-z.
2
Minimally invasive surgery: a historical and legal perspective on technological transformation.微创手术:技术变革的历史与法律视角
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 21;19(1):408. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02589-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustained Improvement in Quality of Patient Handoffs After Orthopaedic Surgery I-PASS Intervention.骨科手术后 I-PASS 干预后患者交接质量的持续改善。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Sep 6;6(9). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00079. eCollection 2022 Sep 1.
2
Five strategies for clinicians to advance diagnostic excellence.临床医生提升卓越诊断能力的五种策略。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 16;376:e068044. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068044.
3
Defining and Studying Errors in Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.定义和研究外科护理中的错误:系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1;275(6):1067-1073. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005351. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Recognizing Heuristics and Bias in Clinical Decision-making.认识临床决策中的启发法与偏差
Ann Surg. 2020 May;271(5):813-814. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003699.
5
Diagnostic error in the emergency department: learning from national patient safety incident report analysis.急诊科的诊断错误:从国家患者安全事件报告分析中学习。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0289-3.
6
Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The "Big Three" - vascular events, infections, and cancers.医疗事故索赔中与严重误诊相关的伤害:“三大类”——血管事件、感染和癌症。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Aug 27;6(3):227-240. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019.
7
Analysis of Human Performance Deficiencies Associated With Surgical Adverse Events.分析与手术不良事件相关的人为绩效缺陷。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e198067. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8067.
8
Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety.关于使用修订后的更安全诊断工具来帮助衡量和提高诊断安全性的建议。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Nov 26;6(4):315-323. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0012.
9
A cognitive forcing tool to mitigate cognitive bias - a randomised control trial.一种减轻认知偏差的认知干预工具——随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1444-3.
10
Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.教授批判性思维:以认知偏差教学减少诊断错误和提高患者安全的案例。
Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518.