• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赋权安大略省长期护理居民,共同塑造他们称之为家的地方:一项共同设计协议。

Empowering Ontario's long-term care residents to shape the place they call home: a codesign protocol.

机构信息

Ontario Association of Residents' Councils, Markham, Ontario, Canada

Ontario Association of Residents' Councils, Markham, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 6;14(2):e077791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077791.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077791
PMID:38320841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10860031/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Canada's long-term care (LTC) homes were founded on an institutional model that viewed residents as passive recipients of care. Many homes continue to follow this model leaving residents removed from operational decision-making within their homes. However, involving residents in the design of their LTC home's environment, programmes and operations can improve the residents' quality of life and other outcomes. This codesign project creates a toolkit/resource for LTC homes to facilitate meaningful resident engagement in their home's organisational design and governance.

METHOD

This three-part project consists of a scoping review, qualitative interviews, toolkit/resource development and prototyping. In part 1, we conduct a scoping review to synthesise existing knowledge on approaches to engaging LTC home residents in organisational design and governance of their LTC homes, as well as explore barriers, challenges and facilitators of engagement, considerations for diversity and cognitive change, and approaches to evaluation. In part 2, we will have interviews and focus groups with residents, team members (staff) and administrators to assess community capacity to implement and sustain a programme to engage LTC residents in organisational design and governance of their LTC homes. The third part of our project uses these findings to help codesign toolkit(s)/resource(s) to enable the engagement of LTC residents in the organisational design and governance of their LTC homes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The project is conducted in partnership with the Ontario Association of Residents' Councils. We will leverage their communication to disseminate findings and support the use of the codesigned toolkit(s)/resource(S) with knowledge users. We will also publish the study results in an academic journal and present at conferences, webinars and workshops. These results can influence practices within LTC homes by inspiring an organisational culture where residents help shape the place they call home. The interviews and focus groups, conducted in part 2, have been submitted to the University Health Network Research Ethics Board.

摘要

背景

加拿大的长期护理(LTC)院建立在一种机构模式之上,该模式将居民视为被动的护理接受者。许多养老院仍然遵循这种模式,使居民无法参与他们所在养老院的运营决策。然而,让居民参与设计他们的长期护理院的环境、计划和运营,可以提高居民的生活质量和其他结果。这个共同设计项目为长期护理院创建了一个工具包/资源,以促进居民有意义地参与他们所在家庭的组织设计和治理。

方法

这个三部分项目包括范围审查、定性访谈、工具包/资源开发和原型设计。在第 1 部分中,我们进行范围审查,以综合现有知识,了解让长期护理院居民参与他们所在长期护理院的组织设计和治理的方法,以及探索参与的障碍、挑战和促进因素、多样性和认知变化的考虑因素,以及评估方法。在第 2 部分,我们将对居民、团队成员(工作人员)和管理人员进行访谈和焦点小组讨论,以评估社区实施和维持一项计划的能力,该计划旨在让长期护理院居民参与他们所在长期护理院的组织设计和治理。我们项目的第三部分使用这些发现来帮助共同设计工具包/资源,以实现长期护理院居民参与他们所在长期护理院的组织设计和治理。

伦理与传播

该项目是与安大略省居民委员会协会合作进行的。我们将利用他们的沟通渠道来传播研究结果,并支持知识用户使用共同设计的工具包/资源。我们还将在学术期刊上发表研究结果,并在会议、网络研讨会和研讨会上进行演示。这些结果可以通过激发一种居民帮助塑造他们称之为家的地方的组织文化,影响长期护理院的实践。第 2 部分中进行的访谈和焦点小组已提交给大学健康网络研究伦理委员会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/10860031/58c3ba9bfb0d/bmjopen-2023-077791f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/10860031/58c3ba9bfb0d/bmjopen-2023-077791f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/10860031/58c3ba9bfb0d/bmjopen-2023-077791f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Empowering Ontario's long-term care residents to shape the place they call home: a codesign protocol.赋权安大略省长期护理居民,共同塑造他们称之为家的地方:一项共同设计协议。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 6;14(2):e077791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077791.
2
Supporting resident-centred decision-making about transitions from long-term care homes to hospital: a qualitative study protocol.支持以居民为中心的决策,以实现从长期护理院到医院的过渡:一项定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 29;14(11):e086748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086748.
3
Social connection in long-term care homes: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.长期护理院中的社交联系:障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 22;24(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05454-8.
4
What is the level of information technology maturity in Ontario's long-term care homes? A cross-sectional survey study protocol.安大略省长期护理院的信息技术成熟度如何?一项横断面调查研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e064745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064745.
5
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
6
Evaluation of the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long Term Care (SPA-LTC) programme: a protocol of a cluster randomised control trial.强化长期护理中的缓和医疗方法(SPA-LTC)方案的评价:一项群组随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 25;13(10):e073585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073585.
7
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.养老院内老年人预防尿路感染的策略:StOP UTI 现实综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.
8
Social integration and loneliness among long-term care home residents: protocol for a scoping review.长期护理院居民的社会融合和孤独感:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 9;9(12):e033240. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033240.
9
Supporting the "hallway residents": a qualitative descriptive study of staff perspectives on implementing the Namaste Care intervention in long-term care.支持“走廊居民”:一项关于工作人员对长期护理中实施 Namaste 护理干预看法的定性描述性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04360-9.
10
Nurse-Led Virtual Delivery of PIECES in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes to Support the Care of Older Adults Experiencing Responsive Behaviors During COVID-19: Qualitative Descriptive Study.在加拿大长期护理院中由护士主导的PIECES虚拟服务,以支持在COVID-19期间对出现反应性行为的老年人的护理:定性描述性研究
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Dec 13;5(1):e42731. doi: 10.2196/42731.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting resident-centred decision-making about transitions from long-term care homes to hospital: a qualitative study protocol.支持以居民为中心的决策,以实现从长期护理院到医院的过渡:一项定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 29;14(11):e086748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086748.

本文引用的文献

1
Letter to the Editor Re: Manis DR, Bronskill SE, Rochon PA, et al. Defining the Assisted Living Sector in Canada: An Environmental Scan. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022;23(11):1871-1877.e1.致编辑的信 回复:马尼什·DR、布龙斯基尔·SE、罗尚·PA等。《界定加拿大的辅助生活部门:一项环境扫描》。《美国医学主任协会杂志》。2022年;23(11):1871 - 1877.e1。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jul;24(7):1094-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.03.042. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Defining the Assisted Living Sector in Canada: An Environmental Scan.加拿大辅助生活领域的界定:环境扫描。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Nov;23(11):1871-1877.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.07.018. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
3
Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - a perspective on definition and distinctions.
共同创造、共同设计、共同生产促进公共卫生-对定义和区别的看法。
Public Health Res Pract. 2022 Jun 15;32(2):3222211. doi: 10.17061/phrp3222211.
4
Protocol for a scoping review on the methods for engaging long-term care residents with dementia in research and guideline development.关于在研究和指南制定中让患有痴呆症的长期护理居民参与的方法的范围综述协议。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 25;11(8):e051602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051602.
5
Quality improvement studies in nursing homes: a scoping review.养老院中的质量改进研究:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06803-8.
6
Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a co-design approach to developing an integrated model of care for people with multi-morbid COPD in rural Nepal: a qualitative study.评估在尼泊尔农村地区采用共同设计方法开发一种多合并症 COPD 患者综合护理模式的可行性和可接受性:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e045175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045175.
7
Using qualitative and co-design methods to inform the development of an intervention to support and improve physical activity in childhood cancer survivors: a study protocol for BEing Active after ChildhOod caNcer (BEACON).采用定性和共同设计方法为干预措施的制定提供信息,以支持和改善儿童癌症幸存者的身体活动:一项针对儿童癌症后保持活跃(BEACON)的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 21;10(12):e041073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041073.
8
Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes.长期护理环境中的质量改进:养老院中使用的有效策略的范围综述。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Feb;12(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability: Addressing Dynamic Context and Promoting Health Equity Over Time.RE-AIM的扩展以增强可持续性:应对动态环境并长期促进健康公平。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 12;8:134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00134. eCollection 2020.
10
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.