Suppr超能文献

与假手术相比,微创骶髂关节融合术的效果:一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。

The effect of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion compared to sham operation: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Randers Engelke Marie, Gerdhem Paul, Stuge Britt, Diarbakerli Elias, Nordsletten Lars, Röhrl Stephan M, Kibsgård Thomas Johan

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 1;68:102438. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102438. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive fusion of the sacroiliac joint as treatment for low back pain may reduce pain and improve function compared to non-operative treatment, although clear evidence is lacking. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion compared to sham surgery on sacroiliac joint pain reduction.

METHODS

In this double-blind randomized sham surgery-controlled trial patients with clinical diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain confirmed with sacroiliac joint injection were included at two university hospitals in Sweden and Norway. Patients were randomized by the operating surgeon at each site to minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion or sham surgery. The primary endpoint was group difference in sacroiliac joint pain on the operated side at six months postoperatively, measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10). Un-blinding and primary analysis were performed when all patients had completed six months follow-up. The trial is closed for new participants and was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03507049.

FINDINGS

Between September 1st, 2018 and October 22nd, 2021, 63 patients were randomized, 32 to the surgical group, 31 to the sham group. Mean age was 45 years (range 26-63) and 59 of 63 (94%) patients were female. The mean reduction in the operated sacroiliac joint from baseline to six months postoperative was 2.6 Numeric Rating Scale points in the surgical group and 1.7 points in the sham group (mean between groups difference -1.0 points; 95% CI, -2.2 to 0.3; p = 0.13).

INTERPRETATION

This double-blind randomized controlled trial could not prove that minimally invasive fusion of the sacroiliac joint was superior to sham surgery at six months postoperative.

FUNDING

Sophies Minde Ortopedi supported a clinical research position for Engelke Marie Randers. Region Stockholm supported the cost for the Swedish ethical application and a clinical research appointment for Paul Gerdhem.

摘要

背景

与非手术治疗相比,骶髂关节微创融合术治疗下腰痛可能会减轻疼痛并改善功能,尽管缺乏明确证据。本试验的目的是评估与假手术相比,微创骶髂关节融合术在减轻骶髂关节疼痛方面的效果。

方法

在这项双盲随机假手术对照试验中,瑞典和挪威的两家大学医院纳入了经骶髂关节注射确诊为骶髂关节疼痛的患者。每个研究点的主刀医生将患者随机分为微创骶髂关节融合术组或假手术组。主要终点是术后6个月手术侧骶髂关节疼痛的组间差异,采用数字评分量表(0 - 10)进行测量。当所有患者完成6个月随访后进行揭盲和初步分析。该试验不再招募新参与者,并已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册:NCT03507049。

研究结果

在2018年9月1日至2021年10月22日期间,63例患者被随机分组,32例进入手术组,31例进入假手术组。平均年龄为45岁(范围26 - 63岁),63例患者中有59例(94%)为女性。手术组从基线到术后6个月手术侧骶髂关节疼痛数字评分量表平均降低2.6分,假手术组降低1.7分(组间平均差异 - 1.0分;95%CI, - 2.2至0.3;p = 0.13)。

解读

这项双盲随机对照试验未能证明骶髂关节微创融合术在术后6个月优于假手术。

资助

索菲斯·明德骨科为恩格尔克·玛丽·兰德斯提供了一个临床研究职位。斯德哥尔摩地区为瑞典伦理申请费用以及为保罗·格德赫姆提供临床研究职位提供了支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d79/10847054/53ca38f29967/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验