• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我如何试水?我如何前进?”:重病后共同设计支持性途径。

"How Do I Test the Waters? How Do I Go Forward?": Codesigning a Supportive Pathway after Critical Illness.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, and.

Department of Physiotherapy.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Jun;21(6):916-927. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202307-599OC.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202307-599OC
PMID:38330169
Abstract

Long-term recovery after critical illness can be affected by post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), a significant burden, which can impact return to activities and work. There is a need for streamlined support for intensive care unit (ICU) patients in their recovery while enduring PICS symptoms. To explore critical illness recovery from the experiences, perspectives, and beliefs of former ICU patients, their caregivers, and multidisciplinary clinicians to design a future rehabilitation intervention prototype to support ICU patients. This was an experience-based codesign (EBCD) study underpinned by the Behavior Change Wheel framework involving ICU patients (<5 years after illness), caregivers, and multidisciplinary clinicians with current clinical experience with ICU recovery at any point along the care continuum (ICU, acute, subacute, or community settings) from two metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Two rounds of experience-based codesign workshops were held between August 2021 and February 2022. Workshop content was analyzed via a reflective thematic approach to determine themes and develop an intervention. The intervention was mapped according to the template for intervention description and replication framework. Forty people participated in the codesign process: 15 ICU patients, 2 caregivers, and 23 clinicians. Fifteen major themes were identified in the experience of ICU recovery. Returning home was a key time point for change, acceptance, and adjustment, with the burden of physical limitations and mental health problems becoming apparent. Most participants expressed that PICS was poorly understood in the community, and there was a lack of support to aid recovery. Based on these results, an intervention prototype was developed with a primary goal of improving care after hospital discharge. This was further refined in the second round of workshops. A resource toolkit was deemed most acceptable to end-users, including a hospital-directed support program involving psychology and physical therapy and an accompanying digital health package. A critical time point for more support in the recovery journey was the transition from hospital to home. To address this, a rehabilitation prototype including a physical and psychological support intervention and supporting digital health toolkit was codesigned. The intervention package will be developed and trialed with future ICU patients and their families. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05044221).

摘要

重症疾病后长期康复可能会受到 ICU 后综合征(PICS)的影响,这是一个严重的负担,可能会影响患者回到活动和工作中。需要为 ICU 患者提供流畅的支持,以帮助他们在忍受 PICS 症状的同时康复。本研究旨在通过 ICU 患者、其照顾者和多学科临床医生的经验、观点和信念来探索重症疾病的康复,以便设计一种未来的康复干预原型来支持 ICU 患者。这是一项基于经验的共同设计(EBCD)研究,由行为改变轮框架提供支持,涉及澳大利亚墨尔本两家大都市医院的 ICU 患者(疾病后<5 年)、照顾者和具有 ICU 康复临床经验的多学科临床医生,其临床经验贯穿整个护理连续体(ICU、急性、亚急性或社区环境)。2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 2 月期间进行了两轮基于经验的共同设计研讨会。通过反思性主题分析对研讨会内容进行分析,以确定主题并开发干预措施。根据干预描述和复制框架对干预措施进行映射。共有 40 人参与了共同设计过程:15 名 ICU 患者、2 名照顾者和 23 名临床医生。在 ICU 康复的体验中确定了 15 个主要主题。回家是一个改变、接受和调整的关键时间点,身体限制和心理健康问题的负担变得明显。大多数参与者表示,社区对 PICS 的认识很差,缺乏帮助康复的支持。基于这些结果,开发了一个干预原型,主要目标是改善出院后的护理。这在第二轮研讨会上得到了进一步完善。资源工具包被认为是最终用户最容易接受的,包括涉及心理学和物理治疗的医院主导支持计划和配套的数字健康套餐。在从医院到家庭的过渡期间,患者需要更多的支持。为了解决这个问题,设计了一个包括身体和心理支持干预以及配套数字健康工具包的康复原型。该干预方案将与未来的 ICU 患者及其家属一起开发和试验。该研究已在 www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT05044221)注册。

相似文献

1
"How Do I Test the Waters? How Do I Go Forward?": Codesigning a Supportive Pathway after Critical Illness.“我如何试水?我如何前进?”:重病后共同设计支持性途径。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Jun;21(6):916-927. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202307-599OC.
2
Critical Care Recovery Center: a model of agile implementation in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors.重症监护康复中心:重症监护病房(ICU)幸存者敏捷实施的典范。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Dec;32(12):1409-1418. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000553. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
3
Changing support needs of survivors of complex critical illness and their family caregivers across the care continuum: a qualitative pilot study of Towards RECOVER.复杂危重症幸存者及其家庭照顾者在整个护理连续过程中不断变化的支持需求:迈向康复(Towards RECOVER)的定性试点研究
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
4
Implementing an intensive care unit (ICU) diary program at a large academic medical center: Results from a randomized control trial evaluating psychological morbidity associated with critical illness.在一家大型学术医疗中心实施重症监护病房(ICU)日记方案:一项评估与危重病相关的心理发病率的随机对照试验结果。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep-Oct;66:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
5
Therapeutic respiratory and functional rehabilitation protocol for intensive care unit patients affected by COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.针对感染新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的重症监护病房患者的治疗性呼吸与功能康复方案:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结
Trials. 2021 Apr 12;22(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05210-y.
6
Diaries for recovery from critical illness.危重症康复日记。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 9;2014(12):CD010468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010468.pub2.
7
Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study.基于家庭的多学科康复方案对 ICU 后综合征患者的可行性:REACH 研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Aug 5;25(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03709-z.
8
Multidisciplinary ICU Recovery Clinic Visits: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient-Provider Dialogues.多学科 ICU 康复诊所就诊:患者-提供者对话的定性分析。
Chest. 2023 Apr;163(4):843-854. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
Patient and family experience of physical rehabilitation on the intensive care unit: a qualitative exploration.患者和家属在重症监护病房进行物理康复治疗的体验:一项定性探索。
Physiotherapy. 2020 Dec;109:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Resilience in Survivors of Critical Illness in the Context of the Survivors' Experience and Recovery.重症幸存者经历与康复背景下的心理复原力
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1351-60. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-782OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering Recovery: A Co-Designed Intervention to Transform Care for Operable Lung Cancer.助力康复:一项共同设计的干预措施,旨在改变可手术肺癌的护理方式。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70196. doi: 10.1111/hex.70196.
2
Using Experience Based Co-Design to Develop a Novel Psychological Intervention With People With Intellectual Disabilities and Stakeholders.运用基于经验的协同设计,与智障人士及利益相关者共同开发一种新型心理干预措施。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jan;38(1):e70022. doi: 10.1111/jar.70022.
3
Digital health interventions in adult intensive care and recovery after critical illness to promote survivorship care.
成人重症监护及危重症康复中的数字健康干预措施,以促进生存护理。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Jan 4;26(1):96-104. doi: 10.1177/17511437241311105. eCollection 2025 Feb.