Wendt Julie, Knudsen Benjamin, Frame Leigh A
Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States.
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024 Feb 6;13:27536130241231508. doi: 10.1177/27536130241231508. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
A pro-inflammatory metabolic state is key to the chronic disease epidemic. Clinicians' ability to use nutrients to balance inflammation via oxidant homeostasis depends on the quality of antioxidants research. Understanding the intersection of two prominent theories for how antioxidants quell inflammation-nutritional hormesis and oxidant scavenging-will enable therapeutic antioxidant use in clinical practice. We sought to survey the literature to answer the question: has the hormetic response of exogenous antioxidants been studied in humans and if so, what is its effect This review investigates the less well-established theory, nutritional hormesis. To understand the state of hormetic response research, we conducted a literature review describing the relationship between exogenous antioxidants, hormesis, and chronic disease. We used an adaptive search strategy (PubMed and Scopus), retrieving 343 articles, of which 218 were unique. Most studies reviewed the hormetic response in plant and cell models (73.6%) while only 2.2% were in humans. Given the limited robust evidence, clinicians lack research-based guidance on the appropriate therapeutic dose of exogenous antioxidants or, more concerning, supra-physiological dosing via supplements. A critical hurdle in searching the literature is the lack of standardized nomenclature describing the hormetic effect, challenging the ability of clinicians to make informed decisions. Non-human research shows a biphasic, hormetic relationship with antioxidants but observational studies have yet to translate this into the complexities of human biochemistry and physiology. Therefore, we cannot accurately translate this into clinical care. To remedy this insufficiency, we suggest: (1) Improved data collection quality: controlled diet, standardized antioxidant measurements, bioavailability assessed via biomarkers; (2) Larger, harmonized datasets: research subject transparency, keyword standardization, consensus on a hormesis definition.
促炎代谢状态是慢性病流行的关键。临床医生通过氧化还原稳态利用营养物质平衡炎症的能力取决于抗氧化剂研究的质量。了解抗氧化剂抑制炎症的两种主要理论——营养应激和氧化清除——的交叉点,将有助于在临床实践中使用治疗性抗氧化剂。我们试图通过文献综述来回答这个问题:外源性抗氧化剂的应激反应是否在人体中得到研究?如果是,其效果如何?本综述调查了较少被认可的理论——营养应激。为了解应激反应研究的现状,我们进行了一项文献综述,描述外源性抗氧化剂、应激反应和慢性病之间的关系。我们采用了适应性搜索策略(PubMed和Scopus),检索到343篇文章,其中218篇是唯一的。大多数研究综述了植物和细胞模型中的应激反应(73.6%),而只有2.2%的研究涉及人体。鉴于有力证据有限,临床医生缺乏关于外源性抗氧化剂适当治疗剂量的基于研究的指导,或者更令人担忧的是,缺乏关于通过补充剂进行超生理剂量给药的指导。检索文献的一个关键障碍是缺乏描述应激效应的标准化术语,这挑战了临床医生做出明智决策的能力。非人体研究表明抗氧化剂与之存在双相的应激关系,但观察性研究尚未将其转化为人体生物化学和生理学的复杂性。因此,我们无法准确地将其转化为临床护理。为弥补这一不足,我们建议:(1)提高数据收集质量:控制饮食、标准化抗氧化剂测量、通过生物标志物评估生物利用度;(2)建立更大、统一的数据集:研究对象透明化、关键词标准化、对应激反应定义达成共识。