Département de Médecine de Famille et de Méde-cine d'Urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada (C.H.); Département des Sciences de la Santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Saguenay, Québec, Canada, (M.C.C.); Memorial University, Primary Healthcare Research Unit, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada (K.A.B., O.C.); Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (N.M.); Dalhousie University, Department of Family Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (F.B.); Département de Médecine de Famille, Univer-sité McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada (P.L.B., P.P.); Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (A.D.); Department of Academic Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (V.R.R.); Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d'Urgence, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada (F.L.); Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada (L.G.); École de Travail Social, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada (P.M.); Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Saguenay, Québec, Canada (M.L.); Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (F.F.); Quebec-SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Qué-bec, Québec, Canada (V.S.); Newfoundland and Labrador-SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Saint John's Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada (M.W.)
Département de Médecine de Famille et de Méde-cine d'Urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada (C.H.); Département des Sciences de la Santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Saguenay, Québec, Canada, (M.C.C.); Memorial University, Primary Healthcare Research Unit, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada (K.A.B., O.C.); Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (N.M.); Dalhousie University, Department of Family Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (F.B.); Département de Médecine de Famille, Univer-sité McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada (P.L.B., P.P.); Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (A.D.); Department of Academic Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (V.R.R.); Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d'Urgence, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada (F.L.); Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada (L.G.); École de Travail Social, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada (P.M.); Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Saguenay, Québec, Canada (M.L.); Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (F.F.); Quebec-SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Qué-bec, Québec, Canada (V.S.); Newfoundland and Labrador-SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Saint John's Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada (M.W.).
Ann Fam Med. 2020 May;18(3):218-226. doi: 10.1370/afm.2499.
Case management (CM) is a promising intervention for frequent users of health care services. Our research question was how and under what circumstances does CM in primary care work to improve outcomes among frequent users with chronic conditions?
We conducted a realist synthesis, searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO (1996 to September 2017) for articles meeting the following criteria: (1) population: adult frequent users with chronic disease, (2) intervention: CM in a primary care setting with a postintervention evaluation, and (3) primary outcomes: integration of services, health care system use, cost, and patient outcome measures. Academic and gray literature were evaluated for relevance and robustness. Independent reviewers extracted data to identify context, mechanism, and outcome (CMO) configurations. Analysis of CMO configurations allowed for the modification of an initial program theory toward a refined program theory.
Of the 9,295 records retrieved, 21 peer-reviewed articles and an additional 89 documents were retained. We evaluated 19 CM interventions and identified 11 CMO configurations. The development of a trusting relationship fostering patient and clinician engagement in the CM intervention was recurrent in many CMO configurations.
Our refined program theory proposes that in the context of easy access to an experienced and trusted case manager who provides comprehensive care while maintaining positive interactions with patients, the development of this relationship fosters the engagement of both individuals and yields positive outcomes when the following mechanisms are triggered: patients and clinicians feel supported, respected, accepted, engaged, and committed; and patients feel less anxious, more secure, and empowered to self-manage.
病例管理(CM)是一种有前途的医疗服务频繁使用者干预措施。我们的研究问题是,病例管理在初级保健中如何以及在什么情况下工作,以改善慢性病频繁使用者的结局?
我们进行了一项真实主义综合研究,在 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase 和 PsycINFO(1996 年至 2017 年 9 月)中搜索符合以下标准的文章:(1)人群:患有慢性病的成年频繁使用者,(2)干预:在初级保健环境中进行病例管理,具有干预后评估,(3)主要结局:服务整合、卫生保健系统使用、成本和患者结局测量。评估学术和灰色文献的相关性和稳健性。独立审查员提取数据以确定背景、机制和结果(CMO)配置。对 CMO 配置的分析允许对初始方案理论进行修改,以得到改进的方案理论。
从检索到的 9295 条记录中,保留了 21 篇同行评议的文章和另外 89 篇文献。我们评估了 19 项病例管理干预措施,确定了 11 个 CMO 配置。在许多 CMO 配置中,建立信任关系,促进患者和临床医生参与病例管理干预措施的情况反复出现。
我们改进后的方案理论提出,在容易获得经验丰富且值得信赖的病例经理的情况下,该病例经理提供全面护理,同时与患者保持积极互动,在以下机制被触发时,这种关系的发展促进了个人的参与,并产生了积极的结果:患者和临床医生感到支持、尊重、接受、参与和承诺;患者感到焦虑减轻、更安全、更有能力自我管理。