Division of Clinical Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 5;16(3):464. doi: 10.3390/nu16030464.
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend dietary interventions as one of the most important treatments for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Evidence to confirm the efficacy of these treatment modalities is lacking. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of dietary interventions on GERD-related outcomes evaluated in intervention studies on GERD patients. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases were utilized for the literature search. Two independent researchers searched for relevant publications published up until June 2023. Intervention studies evaluating the efficacy of dietary interventions in patients with GERD were included. RESULTS: A total of 577 articles were identified during the initial literature search. After reviewing, 21 studies with 16 different types of dietary interventions were included in the analysis. The interventions were divided into low-carbohydrate diets (3 studies), high-fat diets (2 studies), speed of eating studies (3 studies), low-FODMAP diets (2 studies), and other interventions (12 studies). A meta-analysis could be performed for low-carbohydrate diets and speed of eating interventions. Low-carbohydrate diets resulted in a significant reduction in esophageal acid exposure time (mean difference = -2.834%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.554 to -1.114), while a slow speed of eating did not lead to a lower percentage of reflux events compared to fast eating (risk ratio = 1.044, 95% CI: 0.543-2.004). Most other interventions showed positive effects in only a single study. CONCLUSION: Low-carbohydrate diets showed a significant improvement in GERD-related outcomes, while a slow eating speed did not result in a reduction in reflux events. The overall evidence regarding dietary interventions in GERD remains scarce. High-quality, long-term RCTs are still required to confirm the effects of dietary interventions in GERD patients.
背景:国际指南建议将饮食干预作为胃食管反流病(GERD)患者最重要的治疗方法之一。目前缺乏证实这些治疗方法有效性的证据。本研究旨在评估饮食干预对 GERD 患者干预研究中评估的 GERD 相关结局的疗效。
方法:根据 PRISMA 进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用 PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Sciences 和 Scopus 数据库进行文献搜索。两名独立研究人员搜索截至 2023 年 6 月发表的相关出版物。纳入评估饮食干预对 GERD 患者疗效的干预研究。
结果:最初的文献搜索共确定了 577 篇文章。经过审查,共有 21 项研究纳入了 16 种不同类型的饮食干预,这些干预分为低碳水化合物饮食(3 项研究)、高脂肪饮食(2 项研究)、进食速度研究(3 项研究)、低 FODMAP 饮食(2 项研究)和其他干预(12 项研究)。可以对低碳水化合物饮食和进食速度干预进行荟萃分析。低碳水化合物饮食可显著减少食管酸暴露时间(平均差异=-2.834%,95%置信区间[CI]:-4.554 至-1.114),而进食速度较慢与进食速度较快相比,并不会导致反流事件的百分比降低(风险比=1.044,95%CI:0.543-2.004)。大多数其他干预仅在一项研究中显示出积极效果。
结论:低碳水化合物饮食可显著改善 GERD 相关结局,而进食速度较慢不会减少反流事件。关于 GERD 中饮食干预的总体证据仍然很少。仍需要高质量、长期的 RCT 来证实饮食干预对 GERD 患者的效果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-3-11
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-8-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-11-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025-5
World J Gastroenterol. 2025-1-7
Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2021-12-31
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022-1-1
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021-11-1
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2021-7