Losurdo Agnese, Di Muzio Antonio, Cianciotti Beatrice Claudia, Dipasquale Angelo, Persico Pasquale, Barigazzi Chiara, Bono Beatrice, Feno Simona, Pessina Federico, Santoro Armando, Simonelli Matteo
Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;16(3):603. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030603.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal primary brain tumor, bearing a survival estimate below 10% at five years, despite standard chemoradiation treatment. At recurrence, systemic treatment options are limited and the standard of care is not well defined, with inclusion in clinical trials being highly encouraged. So far, the use of immunotherapeutic strategies in GBM has not proved to significantly improve patients' prognosis in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM, nor in the recurrent setting. Probably this has to do with the unique immune environment of the central nervous system, which harbors several immunosuppressive/pro-tumorigenic factors, both soluble (e.g., TGF-β, IL-10, STAT3, prostaglandin E2, and VEGF) and cellular (e.g., Tregs, M2 phenotype TAMs, and MDSC). Here we review the immune composition of the GBMs microenvironment, specifically focusing on the phenotype and function of the T cell compartment. Moreover, we give hints on the therapeutic strategies, such as immune checkpoint blockade, vaccinations, and adoptive cell therapy, that, interacting with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, might both target in different ways the tumor microenvironment and potentiate the activity of standard therapies. The path to be followed in advancing clinical research on immunotherapy for GBM treatment relies on a twofold strategy: testing combinatorial treatments, aiming to restore active immune anti-tumor responses, tackling immunosuppression, and additionally, designing more phase 0 and window opportunity trials with solid translational analyses to gain deeper insight into the on-treatment shaping of the GBM microenvironment.
胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是最具侵袭性和致命性的原发性脑肿瘤,尽管采用了标准的放化疗治疗,其五年生存率估计仍低于10%。复发时,全身治疗选择有限,护理标准尚不明确,因此强烈鼓励患者参加临床试验。到目前为止,免疫治疗策略在新诊断的GBM治疗中,以及在复发情况下,均未被证明能显著改善患者的预后。这可能与中枢神经系统独特的免疫环境有关,该环境含有多种免疫抑制/促肿瘤因子,包括可溶性因子(如转化生长因子-β、白细胞介素-10、信号转导和转录激活因子3、前列腺素E2和血管内皮生长因子)和细胞性因子(如调节性T细胞、M2表型肿瘤相关巨噬细胞和髓源性抑制细胞)。在此,我们综述了GBM微环境的免疫组成,特别关注T细胞区室的表型和功能。此外,我们还介绍了一些治疗策略,如免疫检查点阻断、疫苗接种和过继性细胞治疗,这些策略与肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞相互作用,可能以不同方式靶向肿瘤微环境并增强标准疗法的活性。推进GBM免疫治疗临床研究应遵循的途径依赖于双重策略:测试联合治疗,旨在恢复积极的免疫抗肿瘤反应、解决免疫抑制问题;此外,设计更多的0期和窗口期试验,并进行扎实的转化分析,以更深入地了解GBM微环境在治疗过程中的变化情况。