• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用人工智能预测自发性远端输尿管结石排出。

Prediction of spontaneous distal ureteral stone passage using artificial intelligence.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.

Department of Computer Engineering, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jul;56(7):2179-2186. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-03955-4. Epub 2024 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-03955-4
PMID:38340263
Abstract

PURPOSE

Identifying factors predicting the spontaneous passage of distal ureteral stones and evaluating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in prediction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The files of patients presenting with distal ureteral stones were retrospectively evaluated. Those who experienced spontaneous passage were assigned to Group P, while those who did not were assigned to Group N. Demographic and clinical data of both groups were compared. Then, logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors predicting spontaneous stone passage. Based on these factors, a logistic regression model was prepared, and artificial intelligence algorithms trained on the dataset were compared with this model to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in predicting spontaneous stone passage.

RESULTS

When comparing stone characteristics and NCCT findings, it was found that the stone size was significantly smaller in Group P (4.9 ± 1.7 mm vs. 6.8 ± 1.4 mm), while the ureteral diameter was significantly higher in Group P (3.3 ± 0.9 mm vs. 3.1 ± 1.1 mm) (p < 0.05). Parameters such as stone HU, stone radiopacity, renal pelvis AP diameter, and perirenal stranding were similar between the groups. In multivariate analysis, stone size and alpha-blocker usage were significant factors in predicting spontaneous stone passage. The ROC analysis for the logistic regression model constructed from the significant variables revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.835, with sensitivity of 80.1% and specificity of 68.4%. AI algorithms predicted the spontaneous stone passage up to 92% sensitivity and up to 86% specifity.

CONCLUSIONS

AI algorithms are high-powered alternatives that can be used in the prediction of spontaneous distal ureteral stone passage.

摘要

目的

确定预测远端输尿管结石自行排出的相关因素,并评估人工智能在预测中的有效性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析就诊于我院的远端输尿管结石患者的病例资料。结石自行排出的患者归入 P 组,未自行排出的归入 N 组。比较两组患者的一般资料及临床数据,采用 Logistic 回归分析确定预测结石自行排出的相关因素,基于这些因素建立 Logistic 回归模型,并与人工智能算法进行比较,以评估人工智能在预测结石自行排出中的有效性。

结果

对比结石特征和 NCCT 检查结果发现,P 组的结石直径明显更小(4.9±1.7mm 比 6.8±1.4mm),而 P 组的输尿管直径明显更大(3.3±0.9mm 比 3.1±1.1mm)(p<0.05)。两组的结石 CT 值、结石密度、肾盂前后径、肾周渗出等参数无显著差异。多因素分析显示,结石直径和α受体阻滞剂的使用是预测结石自行排出的独立因素。基于这些显著变量建立的 Logistic 回归模型的 ROC 分析显示曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.835,灵敏度为 80.1%,特异度为 68.4%。人工智能算法预测结石自行排出的灵敏度高达 92%,特异度高达 86%。

结论

人工智能算法是一种预测远端输尿管结石自行排出的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Prediction of spontaneous distal ureteral stone passage using artificial intelligence.利用人工智能预测自发性远端输尿管结石排出。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jul;56(7):2179-2186. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-03955-4. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
2
Applying urinary ultrasound to predict the risk of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: a retrospective cohort study.应用尿超声预测自发性输尿管结石排出的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Urol. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01558-w.
3
Prediction of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: Automated 3D-measurements perform equal to radiologists, and linear measurements equal to volumetric.预测自发性输尿管结石排出:自动化 3D 测量与放射科医生相当,线性测量与体积测量相当。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2474-2483. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5242-9. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
4
Analysis of factors affecting spontaneous expulsion of ureteral stones that may predict unfavorable outcomes during watchful waiting periods: What is the influence of diabetes mellitus on the ureter?影响输尿管结石自然排出的因素分析,这些因素可能预示观察等待期的不良结局:糖尿病对输尿管有何影响?
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jun;56(6):455-60. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.6.455. Epub 2015 May 27.
5
Size matters: The width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage.大小很重要:输尿管结石的宽度和位置准确预测了自行排出的机会。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4775-4785. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4852-6. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
6
CT-based determination of maximum ureteral stone area: a predictor of spontaneous passage.基于 CT 的输尿管结石最大面积测定:预测自然排出的指标。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):603-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7276.
7
CT-Based Predictors of Spontaneous Ureteral Stone Passage.基于 CT 的输尿管结石自然排出的预测因素。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Aug;34(8):879-884. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.879.
8
Predictive Factors for Spontaneous Stone Passage and the Potential Role of Serum C-Reactive Protein in Patients with 4 to 10 mm Distal Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Clinical Study.4至10毫米远端输尿管结石患者自发排石的预测因素及血清C反应蛋白的潜在作用:一项前瞻性临床研究
J Urol. 2015 Oct;194(4):1009-13. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.104. Epub 2015 May 9.
9
Radiological signs of stone impaction add no value in predicting spontaneous stone passage.影像学征象在预测结石自行排出方面并无价值。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Aug 6;52(1):114. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01604-0.
10
Can Ureteral Jet Flow Measurement Predict Spontaneous Passage of Distal Ureteral Stones?输尿管喷射流测量能否预测远端输尿管结石的自然排出?
Urol Int. 2018;101(2):156-160. doi: 10.1159/000490498. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of an elastic-scattering spectroscopy and artificial intelligence device in the assessment of lesions suggestive of skin cancer: A comparative effectiveness study.弹性散射光谱学与人工智能设备在疑似皮肤癌病变评估中的应用:一项比较有效性研究。
JAAD Int. 2023 Oct 11;14:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2023.08.019. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Machine learning algorithms in predicting the recurrence of renal stones using clinical data.使用临床数据的机器学习算法预测肾结石复发情况
Urolithiasis. 2023 Dec 14;52(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01516-5.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Urology.
小儿泌尿外科中的人工智能
Urol Clin North Am. 2024 Feb;51(1):91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
4
Timing of Ureteral Stent Removal After Ureteroscopy on Stent-Related Symptoms: A Validated Questionnaire Comparison of 3 and 7 Days Stent Duration.输尿管镜检查后输尿管支架取出时间对支架相关症状的影响:一项关于3天和7天支架留置时间的经验证问卷比较研究
J Endourol. 2024 Jan;38(1):82-87. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0189. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
5
Routine Urinary Biochemistry Does Not Accurately Predict Stone Type Nor Recurrence in Kidney Stone Formers: A Multicentre, Multimodel, Externally Validated Machine-Learning Study.常规尿液生化检查不能准确预测肾结石患者的结石类型和复发:一项多中心、多模型、外部验证的机器学习研究。
J Endourol. 2023 Dec;37(12):1295-1304. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0451. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
6
Mortality Risk Factors in Pediatric Onco-Critical Care Patients and Machine Learning Derived Early Onco-Critical Care Phenotypes in a Retrospective Cohort.儿科肿瘤重症监护患者的死亡风险因素及回顾性队列中基于机器学习得出的早期肿瘤重症监护表型
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Sep 27;5(10):e0976. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000976. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Heat shock protein family A member 8 is a prognostic marker for bladder cancer: Evidences based on experiments and machine learning.热休克蛋白家族 A 成员 8 是膀胱癌的预后标志物:基于实验和机器学习的证据。
J Cell Mol Med. 2023 Dec;27(24):3995-4008. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17977. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
An artificial intelligence method for predicting postoperative urinary incontinence based on multiple anatomic parameters of MRI.一种基于MRI多个解剖参数预测术后尿失禁的人工智能方法。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 20;9(10):e20337. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20337. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Artificial intelligence evaluation of confocal microscope prostate images: our preliminary experience.共聚焦显微镜前列腺图像的人工智能评估:我们的初步经验。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023 Oct;75(5):545-547. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05538-6.
10
The role of 'artificial intelligence, machine learning, virtual reality, and radiomics' in PCNL: a review of publication trends over the last 30 years.“人工智能、机器学习、虚拟现实和放射组学”在经皮肾镜取石术中的作用:过去30年的发表趋势综述
Ther Adv Urol. 2023 Sep 8;15:17562872231196676. doi: 10.1177/17562872231196676. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.