Suppr超能文献

使用结构相似性指数评估多叶准直器的质量保证。

Assessing quality assurance of multi-leaf collimator using the structural similarity index.

机构信息

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Apr;25(4):e14288. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14288. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the viability of utilizing the Structural Similarity Index (SSI*) as an innovative imaging metric for quality assurance (QA) of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC). Additionally, we compared the results obtained through SSI* with those derived from a conventional Gamma index test for three types of Varian machines (Trilogy, Truebeam, and Edge) over a 12-week period of MLC QA in our clinic.

METHOD

To assess sensitivity to MLC positioning errors, we designed a 1 cm slit on the reference MLC, subsequently shifted by 0.5-5 mm on the target MLC. For evaluating sensitivity to output error, we irradiated five 25 cm × 25 cm open fields on the portal image with varying Monitor Units (MUs) of 96-100. We compared SSI* and Gamma index tests using three linear accelerator (LINAC) machines: Varian Trilogy, Truebeam, and Edge, with MLC leaf widths of 1, 0.5, and 0.25 mm. Weekly QA included VMAT and static field modes, with Picket fence test images acquired. Mechanical uncertainties related to the LINAC head, electronic portal imaging device (EPID), and MLC during gantry rotation and leaf motion were monitored.

RESULTS

The Gamma index test started detecting the MLC shift at a threshold of 4 mm, whereas the SSI* metric showed sensitivity to shifts as small as 2 mm. Moreover, the Gamma index test identified dose changes at 95MUs, indicating a 5% dose difference based on the distance to agreement (DTA)/dose difference (DD) criteria of 1 mm/3%. In contrast, the SSI* metric alerted to dose differences starting from 97MUs, corresponding to a 3% dose difference. The Gamma index test passed all measurements conducted on each machine. However, the SSI* metric rejected all measurements from the Edge and Trilogy machines and two from the Truebeam.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that the SSI* exhibits greater sensitivity than the Gamma index test in detecting MLC positioning errors and dose changes between static and VMAT modes. The SSI* metric outperformed the Gamma index test regarding sensitivity across these parameters.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估结构相似性指数(SSI*)作为多叶准直器(MLC)质量保证(QA)的创新成像指标的可行性。此外,我们在诊所的 MLC QA 期间,比较了 SSI*与常规伽玛指数测试在三种瓦里安机器(Trilogy、Truebeam 和 Edge)上的结果,这三种机器分别进行了为期 12 周的测试。

方法

为了评估对 MLC 定位误差的敏感性,我们在参考 MLC 上设计了一个 1cm 的狭缝,随后在目标 MLC 上移动 0.5-5mm。为了评估对输出误差的敏感性,我们用 96-100MU 的不同监视器单位(MU)在门户图像上照射五个 25cm×25cm 的开放场。我们使用三种直线加速器(LINAC)机器(瓦里安 Trilogy、Truebeam 和 Edge)比较了 SSI*和伽玛指数测试,MLC 叶片宽度分别为 1、0.5 和 0.25mm。每周 QA 包括 VMAT 和静态场模式,并获取了 Picket fence 测试图像。监测 LINAC 机头、电子门户成像设备(EPID)和 MLC 在旋转和叶片运动过程中的机械不确定性。

结果

伽玛指数测试在 4mm 的阈值下开始检测 MLC 移动,而 SSI* 指标则对 2mm 小的移动敏感。此外,伽玛指数测试在 95MU 时识别出剂量变化,根据距离一致性(DTA)/剂量差(DD)标准为 1mm/3%,表明存在 5%的剂量差。相比之下,SSI指标从 97MU 开始提示剂量差异,对应 3%的剂量差异。伽玛指数测试通过了对每台机器的所有测量。然而,SSI指标拒绝了 Edge 和 Trilogy 机器的所有测量以及 Truebeam 机器的两次测量。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,SSI* 在检测静态和 VMAT 模式之间的 MLC 定位误差和剂量变化方面比伽玛指数测试更敏感。SSI* 指标在这些参数方面的敏感性优于伽玛指数测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d9c/11005984/3efcbf12fc09/ACM2-25-e14288-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验