Suppr超能文献

美国超声放射学会共识会议推荐偶然发现胆囊息肉的管理:10 位放射科医生之间的读者间协议。

Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations for Incidental Gallbladder Polyp Management: Interreader Agreement Among 10 Radiologists.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White Bldg, Rm 270, Boston, MA 02114.

Department of Radiology, Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 May;222(5):e2330720. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.30720. Epub 2024 Feb 14.

Abstract

The 2022 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) consensus conference recommendations for small gallbladder polyps support management that is less aggressive than earlier approaches and may help standardize evaluation of polyps by radiologists. The purpose of the present study was to assess the interreader agreement of radiologists in applying SRU recommendations for management of incidental gallbladder polyps on ultrasound. This retrospective study included 105 patients (75 women and 30 men; median age, 51 years) with a gallbladder polyp on ultrasound (without features highly suspicious for invasive or malignant tumor) who underwent cholecystectomy between January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2021. Ten abdominal radiologists independently reviewed ultrasound examinations and, using the SRU recommendations, assessed one polyp per patient to assign risk category (extremely low risk, low risk, or indeterminate risk) and make a possible recommendation for surgical consultation. Five radiologists were considered less experienced (< 5 years of experience), and five were considered more experienced (≥ 5 years of experience). Interreader agreement was evaluated. Polyps were classified pathologically as nonneoplastic or neoplastic. For risk category assignments, interreader agreement was substantial among all readers (k = 0.710), less-experienced readers (k = 0.705), and more-experienced readers (k = 0.692). For surgical consultation recommendations, inter-reader agreement was substantial among all readers (k = 0.795) and more-experienced readers (k = 0.740) and was almost perfect among less-experienced readers (k = 0.811). Of 10 readers, a median of 5.0 (IQR, 2.0-8.0), 4.0 (IQR, 2.0-7.0), and 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.0) readers classified polyps as extremely low risk, low risk, and indeterminate risk, respectively. Across readers, the percentage of polyps classified as extremely low risk ranged from 32% to 72%; as low risk, from 24% to 65%; and as indeterminate risk, from 0% to 8%. Of 10 readers, a median of zero change to 0 (IQR, 0.0-1.0) readers recommended surgical consultation; the percentage of polyps receiving a recommendation for surgical consultation ranged from 4% to 22%. Of a total of 105 polyps, 102 were nonneo-plastic and three were neoplastic (all benign). Based on readers' most common assessments for nonneoplastic polyps, the risk category was extremely low risk for 53 polyps, low risk for 48 polyps, and indeterminate risk for one polyp; surgical consultation was recommended for 16 polyps. Ten abdominal radiologists showed substantial agreement for polyp risk categorizations and surgical consultation recommendations, although areas of reader variability were identified. The findings support the overall reproducibility of the SRU recommendations, while indicating opportunity for improvement.

摘要

2022 年超声放射学家学会(SRU)共识会议对小胆囊息肉的推荐意见支持比早期方法更具侵略性的管理,这可能有助于放射科医生标准化评估息肉。本研究的目的是评估放射科医生在应用 SRU 推荐意见管理超声偶然发现的胆囊息肉方面的读者间一致性。这项回顾性研究纳入了 105 名患者(75 名女性和 30 名男性;中位年龄为 51 岁),这些患者在超声检查中发现有胆囊息肉(无侵袭性或恶性肿瘤的高度可疑特征),并在 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 1 月 1 日期间接受了胆囊切除术。10 名腹部放射科医生独立审查了超声检查,并使用 SRU 推荐意见,对每位患者的一个息肉进行评估,以确定风险类别(极高风险、低风险或不确定风险),并对手术咨询做出可能的推荐。其中 5 名放射科医生被认为经验不足(<5 年经验),5 名被认为经验丰富(≥5 年经验)。评估了读者间的一致性。息肉经病理分类为非肿瘤性或肿瘤性。对于风险类别分配,所有读者(k=0.710)、经验不足的读者(k=0.705)和经验丰富的读者(k=0.692)之间的读者间一致性较高。对于手术咨询建议,所有读者(k=0.795)和经验丰富的读者(k=0.740)之间的读者间一致性较高,经验不足的读者(k=0.811)之间的读者间一致性几乎完美。在 10 名读者中,中位数为 5.0(IQR,2.0-8.0)、4.0(IQR,2.0-7.0)和 0.0(IQR,0.0-0.0),分别有 5.0、4.0 和 0.0 名读者将息肉分类为极高风险、低风险和不确定风险。在所有读者中,将息肉分类为极高风险的比例范围为 32%至 72%;低风险的比例范围为 24%至 65%;不确定风险的比例范围为 0%至 8%。在 10 名读者中,中位数为 0(IQR,0.0-1.0)的读者推荐手术咨询;接受手术咨询建议的息肉比例范围为 4%至 22%。在总共 105 个息肉中,102 个是非肿瘤性的,3 个是肿瘤性的(均为良性)。根据读者对非肿瘤性息肉最常见的评估,53 个息肉的风险类别为极高风险,48 个息肉的风险类别为低风险,1 个息肉的风险类别为不确定风险;建议对 16 个息肉进行手术咨询。10 名腹部放射科医生在息肉风险分类和手术咨询建议方面表现出较高的一致性,尽管存在读者间的差异。这些发现支持了 SRU 推荐意见的总体可重复性,同时也表明有改进的空间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验