Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Center for Value-Based Care Research, Primary Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 May;20(5):699-707. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00672. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
Little is known about the role of social determinants of health (SDOH) in the utilization of novel treatments among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).
This retrospective cohort study used Taussig Cancer Center's Myeloma Patient Registry to identify adults with NDMM between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. Electronic health records data captured treatment with (1) triplet or quadruplet regimen and (2) lenalidomide during the first year after NDMM, and (3) stem-cell transplant (SCT) through December 31, 2022. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations of demographic/clinical characteristics and SDOH with care patterns.
We identified 569 patients with median age at diagnosis of 66 years (IQR, 59-73); 55% were male, 76% White, 23% Black, 1.1% other races, insured by Medicare (51%), private payer (38%), Medicaid (8.3%), and self-pay/other (1.8%). In the multivariable models, self-pay/other payers (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.15 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.54]) was associated with lower odds of triplet or quadruplet regimen, compared with Medicare. Private insurance (AOR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.86]) and self-pay/other payers (AOR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.74]) had lower odds of lenalidomide. Black patients ( White; AOR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.85]) and patients treated at regional hospitals ( Taussig Cancer Center; AOR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.57]) had lower odds of SCT. The odds of receiving triplet or quadruplet regimen, lenalidomide, and SCT also varied by the year of NDMM.
Care for NDMM varied based on race, insurance type, year of diagnosis, and treatment facility. It may be useful to examine the impact of insurance-related characteristics and recent policy initiatives on care disparities.
关于社会决定因素(SDOH)在新发多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者对新疗法的应用中的作用,目前知之甚少。
本回顾性队列研究使用 Taussig 癌症中心的骨髓瘤患者登记处,确定了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间新发 NDMM 的成年人。电子健康记录数据捕捉了治疗方法,包括(1)三联或四联方案和(2)来那度胺在 NDMM 后第一年,以及(3)截至 2022 年 12 月 31 日的干细胞移植(SCT)。多变量逻辑回归模型研究了人口统计学/临床特征和 SDOH 与护理模式之间的关联。
我们确定了 569 名中位年龄为 66 岁(IQR,59-73)的患者;55%为男性,76%为白人,23%为黑人,1.1%为其他种族,由医疗保险(51%)、私人支付者(38%)、医疗补助(8.3%)和自付/其他(1.8%)支付。在多变量模型中,与医疗保险相比,自付/其他支付者(调整后的优势比 [AOR],0.15 [95%CI,0.03 至 0.54])与三联或四联方案的可能性降低相关。私人保险(AOR,0.48 [95%CI,0.27 至 0.86])和自付/其他支付者(AOR,0.16 [95%CI,0.04 至 0.74])接受来那度胺的可能性降低。黑人患者(白人;AOR,0.47 [95%CI,0.26 至 0.85])和在地区医院(Taussig 癌症中心;AOR,0.27 [95%CI,0.12 至 0.57])接受治疗的患者接受 SCT 的可能性降低。接受三联或四联方案、来那度胺和 SCT 的可能性也因 NDMM 的年份而异。
NDMM 的护理因种族、保险类型、诊断年份和治疗机构而异。检查保险相关特征和最近政策举措对护理差异的影响可能会很有用。