• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment.快速综述方法系列:团队考虑因素、研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):418-423. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112185.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies.有哪些研究证据快速综述的最佳方法?系统综述和原始研究的综述。
Res Synth Methods. 2024 Jan;15(1):2-20. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1664. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance-A mixed-methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance.评价科克伦快速评论方法指南中期版——一项关于理解和遵守该指南的混合方法研究。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Nov;14(6):824-846. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1656. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
5
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence.快速综述方法系列:评估证据确定性指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):50-54. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112111.
6
Rapid review methods series: Guidance on the use of supportive software.快速审查方法系列:支持性软件使用指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jul 23;29(4):264-271. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112530.
7
Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.Cochrane 偏倚风险工具在大多数非 Cochrane 系统评价中使用不当。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
8
Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.使用 AMSTAR-2 和 ROBIS 评估系统评价的实施质量的相似性、可靠性和差距:营养评价的系统调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 27;21(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01457-w.
9
High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.在 Cochrane 综述中纳入的诊断准确性研究中,高风险和不明确偏倚评估占主导地位。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;101:73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study.Cochrane 综述中手术与非手术试验的偏倚风险评估充分性:一项方法学研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01123-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of cost analysis in examinations of health coaching interventions: a scoping review protocol.成本分析在健康指导干预措施研究中的应用:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e104082. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104082.
2
The use of horizontal force-velocity profile in soccer: a rapid systematic review.足球运动中水平力-速度曲线的应用:一项快速系统评价
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul 15;17(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01232-0.
3
Risk and protective factors associated with teenage pregnancy and intergenerational interventions: a scoping review protocol.与青少年怀孕相关的风险和保护因素及代际干预措施:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 12;15(6):e094710. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094710.
4
An equity analysis of remote patient monitoring programs unveils assumptions on digital health equity.对远程患者监测项目的公平性分析揭示了关于数字健康公平性的假设。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 29;8(1):320. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01731-x.
5
Policy models for preventative interventions in cardiometabolic diseases: a systematic review.心血管代谢疾病预防干预的政策模型:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 2;25(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12781-y.
6
Mechanical restraint in inpatient psychiatric settings: A systematic review of international prevalence, associations, outcomes, and reduction strategies.住院精神科环境中的机械约束:国际患病率、关联因素、结局及减少策略的系统评价
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;68(1):e57. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2453.
7
Exploring the Moderating Effect of Control Group Type on Intervention Effectiveness in School-Based Anxiety and Depression Prevention: Findings from a Rapid Review and Network Meta-analysis.探索对照组类型对学校焦虑和抑郁预防干预效果的调节作用:快速综述与网络荟萃分析结果
Prev Sci. 2025 Feb;26(2):175-192. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01786-y. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
8
Training and education provided to local change champions within implementation trials: a rapid systematic review.在实施试验中为当地变革推动者提供的培训与教育:一项快速系统评价
Implement Sci. 2025 Feb 5;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01416-9.
9
Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid scoping, mapping and evidence and gap map ('Big Picture Reviews').快速综述方法系列:关于快速范围界定、映射以及证据与差距图(“全景综述”)的指南
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Jul 21;30(4):268-277. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112389.
10
A Rapid Systematic Review Assessing the Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Self-Management in Workers with Long-Term Health Conditions and Disabilities.一项快速系统评价,评估促进长期健康状况和残疾工人自我管理的干预措施的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 23;21(12):1714. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121714.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search.快速综述方法系列:文献检索指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):412-417. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079.
2
Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users.快速评论方法系列:将患者和公众合作伙伴、医疗保健提供者和政策制定者作为知识使用者纳入其中。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):55-61. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112070.
3
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence.快速综述方法系列:评估证据确定性指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):50-54. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112111.
4
Crowdsourcing the identification of studies for COVID-19-related Cochrane Rapid Reviews.众包识别与COVID-19相关的Cochrane快速综述的研究。
Res Synth Methods. 2022 Sep;13(5):585-594. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1559. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Creating efficiencies in the extraction of data from randomized trials: a prospective evaluation of a machine learning and text mining tool.从随机试验中提取数据的效率提升:机器学习和文本挖掘工具的前瞻性评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01354-2.
6
Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey.系统评价自动化工具可提高效率,但知识的匮乏阻碍了其应用:一项调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:80-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
7
Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review.系统评价制作过程中的资源使用差异很大:一项范围综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:287-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.019. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
8
Successful incorporation of single reviewer assessments during systematic review screening: development and validation of sensitivity and work-saved of an algorithm that considers exclusion criteria and count.成功将单一评审员评估纳入系统评价筛选过程:开发并验证一种考虑排除标准和数量的算法的敏感性和节省工作时间的方法。
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 5;10(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01632-6.
9
Agreement in Risk of Bias Assessment Between RobotReviewer and Human Reviewers: An Evaluation Study on Randomised Controlled Trials in Nursing-Related Cochrane Reviews.机器人评估者与人工评估者在偏倚风险评估中的一致性:一项针对 Cochrane 护理相关综述中随机对照试验的评估研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021 Mar;53(2):246-254. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12628. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
10
Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews.考科蓝快速评价方法学组为快速评价提供循证指导。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

快速综述方法系列:团队考虑因素、研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估指南。

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment.

机构信息

Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation - Cochrane Austria, University of Krems, Krems, Austria

Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation - Cochrane Austria, University of Krems, Krems, Austria.

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):418-423. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112185.

DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112185
PMID:37076266
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10715469/
Abstract

This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group (RRMG). Rapid reviews (RRs) use modified systematic review (SR) methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods to ensure integrity. This paper addresses considerations around the acceleration of study selection, data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment in RRs. If a RR is being undertaken, review teams should consider using one or more of the following methodological shortcuts: screen a proportion (eg, 20%) of records dually at the title/abstract level until sufficient reviewer agreement is achieved, then proceed with single-reviewer screening; use the same approach for full-text screening; conduct single-data extraction only on the most relevant data points and conduct single-RoB assessment on the most important outcomes, with a second person verifying the data extraction and RoB assessment for completeness and correctness. Where available, extract data and RoB assessments from an existing SR that meets the eligibility criteria.

摘要

本文是 Cochrane 快速综述方法学小组(RRMG)系列方法学指导文件的一部分。快速综述(RR)使用改良的系统综述(SR)方法来加速综述过程,同时保持系统、透明和可重复的方法以确保完整性。本文讨论了 RR 中研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险(RoB)评估加速的相关考虑。如果正在进行 RR,审查团队应考虑使用以下一种或多种方法学捷径:在标题/摘要层面上双重筛选一定比例(例如 20%)的记录,直到达到足够的审稿人一致性,然后进行单审筛选;在全文筛选中使用相同的方法;仅对最相关的数据点进行单一数据提取,并对最重要的结果进行单一 RoB 评估,第二个人对数据提取和 RoB 评估的完整性和正确性进行验证。在可用的情况下,从符合入选标准的现有 SR 中提取数据和 RoB 评估。