Suppr超能文献

[中国氢燃料电池汽车的全生命周期化石能源消耗与一氧化碳排放]

[Well-to-Wheels Fossil Energy Consumption and CO Emissions of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles in China].

作者信息

Lin Ting, Wu Ye, He Xiao-Yi, Zhang Shao-Jun, Hao Ji-Ming

机构信息

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 Aug 8;39(8):3946-3953. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201712113.

Abstract

Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCVs) have the advantage of high energy efficiency and zero tailpipe emissions. They have been progressively commercialized in recent years. Hydrogen production has diversified technological pathways, which vary greatly in terms of energy and environmental impacts. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) method was applied to evaluate well-to-wheels (WTW) fossil energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO) emissions of FCVs using various hydrogen production pathways. The greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation (GREET) model, developed by the Argonne National Laboratory, was applied as the assessment tool, and a China-specific database was investigated and developed to evaluate typical hydrogen production pathways. Then, we compared the WTW fossil energy consumption and CO emissions of FCVs with those of gasoline vehicles (GVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and battery electric vehicles (BEVs). The results indicated that renewable-energy-based electrolysis of water and biomass gasification are two prospective hydrogen production pathways with significant WTW energy and climate benefits which can help FCVs reduce fossil energy consumption and CO emissions by approximately 90% more than GVs. Among the current pathways with mass adoption, hydrogen production from coke oven gas (COG) has substantial energy and CO mitigation benefits, which enables FCVs to achieve a lower WTW fossil energy consumption than HEVs and lower WTW CO emissions than HEVs and BEVs. Considering the resource reserves and technological maturity in China, hydrogen production from COG and other industrial by-products is recommended for hydrogen energy and FCV development in the short term. In the medium and long terms, utilization of renewable energy to produce hydrogen should be promoted.

摘要

氢燃料电池汽车(FCV)具有能源效率高和尾气零排放的优势。近年来,它们已逐步实现商业化。制氢技术途径呈现多样化,在能源和环境影响方面差异很大。在本研究中,应用生命周期评估(LCA)方法来评估使用各种制氢途径的FCV的全生命周期化石能源消耗和二氧化碳(CO)排放。采用阿贡国家实验室开发的交通领域温室气体、受控排放和能源使用(GREET)模型作为评估工具,并研究和开发了一个中国特定数据库来评估典型的制氢途径。然后,我们将FCV的全生命周期化石能源消耗和CO排放与汽油车(GV)、混合动力电动汽车(HEV)和电池电动汽车(BEV)进行了比较。结果表明,基于可再生能源的水电解和生物质气化是两条具有显著全生命周期能源和气候效益的前瞻性制氢途径,这可以帮助FCV比GV减少约90%以上的化石能源消耗和CO排放。在目前大规模采用的途径中,焦炉煤气(COG)制氢具有显著的能源和CO减排效益,这使得FCV的全生命周期化石能源消耗低于HEV,全生命周期CO排放低于HEV和BEV。考虑到中国的资源储备和技术成熟度,短期内建议利用COG和其他工业副产品制氢来发展氢能和FCV。从中长期来看,应推广利用可再生能源制氢。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验