KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Department of Oral Health Sciences, BIOMAT - Biomaterials Research Group & UZ Leuven (University Hospitals Leuven), Dentistry, Kapucijnenvoer 7 blok a - bus 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Health and Medical Research Institute, Takamatsu, Kagawa, 761-0395, Japan.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Feb 15;28(2):150. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05523-7.
To investigate the influence of adhesive resin application modalities on the film thickness of the adhesive resin and the effectiveness of a two-step universal adhesive (UA) bonded in self-etch (SE) bonding mode to high C-factor class-I cavity-bottom dentin.
After application of the primer of G2-Bond Universal (G2B, GC), the adhesive resin was applied into standard class-I cavities (human molars) following four application modalities: (1) one layer, strongly air-blown; (2) one layer, gently air-blown; (3) two layers, each gently air-blown; (4) one layer, not air-blown. After being restored with composite, each tooth was sectioned to obtain one micro-specimen (n = 10), of which the adhesive resin film thickness was measured using optical microscopy. The micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) was tested immediately or upon 100,000 thermocycles. Statistical analyses involved Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U testing (p < 0.05).
G2B's μTBS was significantly affected by the adhesive resin application modality and aging. Gently air-blowing the adhesive resin resulted in significantly higher immediate μTBS than strong air-blowing or no air-blowing. No significant difference in μTBS was found between single or double gently air-blown adhesive resin applications. The adhesive resin film thickness significantly varied with the application modalities.
A too thin or too thick adhesive resin film thickness adversely affected bond strength of the two-step UA applied in SE mode and high C-factor condition.
The adhesive resin layer thickness can affect the bonding performance of two-step UAs in high C-factor cavities. Dental clinicians remain advised to avoid improper air-blowing of UAs and strictly follow the application instructions.
研究不同的黏结树脂涂布方式对黏结树脂膜厚度的影响,以及两步通用黏结剂(UA)在自酸蚀黏结(SE)模式下应用于高 C 因素Ⅰ类洞底牙本质的有效性。
在涂布 G2-Bond Universal(G2B,GC)底漆后,按以下 4 种涂布方式将黏结树脂涂布于标准Ⅰ类洞(人磨牙):(1)单层,强气流吹干;(2)单层,轻气流吹干;(3)双层,每层轻气流吹干;(4)单层,不吹干。用复合树脂修复后,每个牙都被切割成一个微样本(n=10),使用光学显微镜测量黏结树脂膜厚度。即刻或经过 10 万次热循环后测试微拉伸黏结强度(μTBS)。统计分析采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验(p<0.05)。
G2B 的 μTBS 受到黏结树脂涂布方式和老化的显著影响。轻气流吹干黏结树脂会显著提高即刻 μTBS,强气流吹干或不吹干则较低。单层或双层轻气流吹干黏结树脂的 μTBS 无显著差异。黏结树脂膜厚度随涂布方式显著变化。
黏结树脂膜过厚或过薄会对两步 SE 模式下应用的 UA 的黏结强度产生不利影响。高 C 因素。牙医仍建议避免 UA 的不当吹风,并严格遵循应用说明。
黏结树脂层厚度会影响两步 UA 在高 C 因素窝洞中的黏结性能。