Kitahara Sayaka, Shimizu Shojiro, Takagaki Tomohiro, Inokoshi Masanao, Abdou Ahmed, Burrow Michael F, Nikaido Toru
Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University, 1851 Hozumi, Mizuho, Gifu 501-0296, Japan.
Department of Oral Devices and Materials, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;17(17):4296. doi: 10.3390/ma17174296.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the bonding durability of four different self-etch adhesives to dentin after 24 h and thermal cycling (TC) and to measure the degree of polymerization conversion (DC) in situ. Two-step self-etch adhesives, Clearfil SE Bond 2 (SE2, Kuraray Noritake Dental) and G2-Bond Universal (G2B, GC), and one-step self-etch adhesives, Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive (SBU, 3M ESPE) and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (UBQ, Kuraray Noritake Dental), were used. The labial surfaces of bovine teeth were ground to create flat dentin surfaces. The adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. After resin composite buildup and 24 h water storage, the specimens were sectioned into beams and all groups were subjected to thermal stress for 0, 10,000 (10k), or 20,000 (20k) cycles followed by micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) testing. In situ DC was investigated with a laser Raman microscope. The µTBS data were statistically analyzed and subjected to a Weibull analysis. The different groups were compared at the characteristic strength (63.2% probability of failure) (α = 0.05). Two-Way ANOVA was used to show the effect of different adhesives and thermal cycling on the mean DC% followed by Tukey's multiple comparison post hoc test. G2B/TC10k resulted in a significant increase in the µTBS compared to TC0. SBU/TC20k showed significantly higher µTBS compared to TC0. For comparison between different tested adhesives, SBU showed a significantly lower µTBS compared to G2B after TC10k. G2B and SBU showed a greater number of adhesive failures after TC. Mean DC% was different for each adhesive. The newly developed MDP- and HEMA-free 2-SEA showed similar bonding performance with the gold-standard 2-SEA. However, there is still room for further improvement in terms of SEAs.
本研究的目的是评估四种不同的自酸蚀粘结剂在24小时及热循环(TC)后与牙本质的粘结耐久性,并原位测量聚合转化率(DC)。使用了两步自酸蚀粘结剂Clearfil SE Bond 2(SE2,可乐丽诺瑞特牙科)和G2-Bond Universal(G2B,GC),以及一步自酸蚀粘结剂Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive(SBU,3M ESPE)和Clearfil Universal Bond Quick(UBQ,可乐丽诺瑞特牙科)。将牛牙的唇面磨平以形成平坦的牙本质表面。按照制造商的说明应用粘结剂。在树脂复合材料堆积并储存24小时水后,将标本切成梁状,所有组进行0、10000(10k)或20000(20k)次循环的热应力处理,然后进行微拉伸粘结强度(µTBS)测试。用激光拉曼显微镜研究原位DC。对µTBS数据进行统计分析并进行威布尔分析。在特征强度(失效概率为63.2%)下比较不同组(α = 0.05)。使用双向方差分析来显示不同粘结剂和热循环对平均DC%的影响,随后进行Tukey多重比较事后检验。与TC0相比,G2B/TC10k导致µTBS显著增加。与TC0相比,SBU/TC20k显示出显著更高的µTBS。对于不同测试粘结剂之间的比较,在TC10k后,SBU与G2B相比显示出显著更低的µTBS。在TC后,G2B和SBU显示出更多的粘结失败。每种粘结剂的平均DC%不同。新开发的不含MDP和HEMA的2-SEA显示出与金标准2-SEA相似的粘结性能。然而,就自酸蚀粘结剂而言,仍有进一步改进的空间。