• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲人群急性非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和不稳定型心绞痛(UA)后短期和长期死亡率的数据分析方法。

Data analytics approach for short- and long-term mortality prediction following acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and Unstable Angina (UA) in Asians.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Malaysia.

Cardiac Vascular and Lung Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Malaysia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0298036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298036. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0298036
PMID:38358964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10868757/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional risk assessment tools often lack accuracy when predicting the short- and long-term mortality following a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or Unstable Angina (UA) in specific population.

OBJECTIVE

To employ machine learning (ML) and stacked ensemble learning (EL) methods in predicting short- and long-term mortality in Asian patients diagnosed with NSTEMI/UA and to identify the associated features, subsequently evaluating these findings against established risk scores.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Cardiovascular Disease Database for Malaysia (2006-2019), representing a diverse NSTEMI/UA Asian cohort. Algorithm development utilized in-hospital records of 9,518 patients, 30-day data from 7,133 patients, and 1-year data from 7,031 patients. This study utilized 39 features, including demographic, cardiovascular risk, medication, and clinical features. In the development of the stacked EL model, four base learner algorithms were employed: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), and Random Forest (RF), with the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) serving as the meta learner. Significant features were chosen and ranked using ML feature importance with backward elimination. The predictive performance of the algorithms was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) as a metric. Validation of the algorithms was conducted against the TIMI for NSTEMI/UA using a separate validation dataset, and the net reclassification index (NRI) was subsequently determined.

RESULTS

Using both complete and reduced features, the algorithm performance achieved an AUC ranging from 0.73 to 0.89. The top-performing ML algorithm consistently surpassed the TIMI risk score for in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year predictions (with AUC values of 0.88, 0.88, and 0.81, respectively, all p < 0.001), while the TIMI scores registered significantly lower at 0.55, 0.54, and 0.61. This suggests the TIMI score tends to underestimate patient mortality risk. The net reclassification index (NRI) of the best ML algorithm for NSTEMI/UA patients across these periods yielded an NRI between 40-60% (p < 0.001) relative to the TIMI NSTEMI/UA risk score. Key features identified for both short- and long-term mortality included age, Killip class, heart rate, and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) administration.

CONCLUSIONS

In a broad multi-ethnic population, ML approaches outperformed conventional TIMI scoring in classifying patients with NSTEMI and UA. ML allows for the precise identification of unique characteristics within individual Asian populations, improving the accuracy of mortality predictions. Continuous development, testing, and validation of these ML algorithms holds the promise of enhanced risk stratification, thereby revolutionizing future management strategies and patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

传统的风险评估工具在预测非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)或不稳定型心绞痛(UA)患者的短期和长期死亡率时,往往准确性不足。

目的

运用机器学习(ML)和堆叠集成学习(EL)方法预测亚洲 NSTEMI/UA 患者的短期和长期死亡率,并识别相关特征,随后将这些发现与已建立的风险评分进行评估。

方法

我们分析了来自马来西亚国家心血管疾病数据库(2006-2019 年)的数据,该数据库代表了一个多样化的亚洲 NSTEMI/UA 患者群体。算法开发利用了 9518 名住院患者的住院记录、7133 名患者的 30 天数据和 7031 名患者的 1 年数据。本研究使用了 39 个特征,包括人口统计学、心血管风险、药物和临床特征。在堆叠 EL 模型的开发中,使用了四种基础学习算法:极端梯度提升(XGB)、支持向量机(SVM)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)和随机森林(RF),广义线性模型(GLM)作为元学习器。使用 ML 特征重要性进行特征选择和向后消除来选择显著特征并对其进行排名。使用曲线下面积(AUC)作为指标评估算法的预测性能。使用来自独立验证数据集的 TIMI 对 NSTEMI/UA 进行算法验证,并随后确定净重新分类指数(NRI)。

结果

使用完整和简化特征,算法性能的 AUC 范围为 0.73 至 0.89。性能最佳的 ML 算法始终优于 TIMI 风险评分,用于住院、30 天和 1 年的预测(AUC 值分别为 0.88、0.88 和 0.81,均 p<0.001),而 TIMI 评分分别为 0.55、0.54 和 0.61,这表明 TIMI 评分往往低估了患者的死亡风险。对于这些时期的 NSTEMI/UA 患者,最佳 ML 算法的净重新分类指数(NRI)在 40-60%(p<0.001)之间,相对于 TIMI NSTEMI/UA 风险评分。确定短期和长期死亡率的关键特征包括年龄、Killip 分级、心率和低分子肝素(LMWH)的应用。

结论

在广泛的多民族人群中,ML 方法在对 NSTEMI 和 UA 患者进行分类方面优于传统的 TIMI 评分。ML 允许在个体亚洲人群中精确识别独特特征,从而提高死亡率预测的准确性。这些 ML 算法的不断开发、测试和验证有望提高风险分层的准确性,从而彻底改变未来的管理策略和患者结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/90a8f50db69b/pone.0298036.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/a85d827452e6/pone.0298036.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/513af37d220a/pone.0298036.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/e0ac5fb37047/pone.0298036.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/2b1841bd6b31/pone.0298036.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/59321b17622a/pone.0298036.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/f8d64230d50f/pone.0298036.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/90a8f50db69b/pone.0298036.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/a85d827452e6/pone.0298036.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/513af37d220a/pone.0298036.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/e0ac5fb37047/pone.0298036.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/2b1841bd6b31/pone.0298036.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/59321b17622a/pone.0298036.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/f8d64230d50f/pone.0298036.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9553/10868757/90a8f50db69b/pone.0298036.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Data analytics approach for short- and long-term mortality prediction following acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and Unstable Angina (UA) in Asians.亚洲人群急性非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和不稳定型心绞痛(UA)后短期和长期死亡率的数据分析方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0298036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298036. eCollection 2024.
2
In-hospital mortality risk stratification of Asian ACS patients with artificial intelligence algorithm.基于人工智能算法的亚洲 ACS 患者院内死亡风险分层。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 12;17(12):e0278944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278944. eCollection 2022.
3
Short- and long-term mortality prediction after an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Asians: A machine learning approach.亚洲人急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后的短期和长期死亡率预测:一种机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0254894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254894. eCollection 2021.
4
Does simplicity compromise accuracy in ACS risk prediction? A retrospective analysis of the TIMI and GRACE risk scores.ACS 风险预测中简单化是否会影响准确性?TIMI 和 GRACE 风险评分的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 23;4(11):e7947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007947.
5
Epidemiology and risk factors of patients with types of acute coronary syndrome presenting to a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡一家三级护理医院收治的不同类型急性冠脉综合征患者的流行病学和危险因素。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1217-x.
6
Is the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score a reliable source in a rural hospital for the management of unstable angina/non-ST elevated myocardial infarctions (UA/NSTEMI)?心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)评分在农村医院用于不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(UA/NSTEMI)的管理时是一个可靠的依据吗?
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 Jun 21;11(4):446-449. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1930506.
7
The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making.不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的TIMI风险评分:一种用于预后评估和治疗决策的方法。
JAMA. 2000 Aug 16;284(7):835-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.7.835.
8
Comparison of GRACE and TIMI risk scores in the prediction of in-hospital and long-term outcomes among East Asian non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.比较 GRACE 和 TIMI 风险评分在预测东亚非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院期间和长期结局中的作用。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02311-z.
9
Validity of TIMI Score for Predicting 14-Day Mortality of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.TIMI评分对预测非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者14天死亡率的有效性。
Cureus. 2021 Jan 6;13(1):e12518. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12518.
10
Ensemble machine learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in Asian women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).基于集成学习算法的预测亚洲女性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内死亡率模型
Sci Rep. 2024 May 29;14(1):12378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61151-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Value and Short-Term Prognosis Assessment of Copeptin in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.copeptin在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中的诊断价值及短期预后评估
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2025 Apr;18(2):366-374. doi: 10.1007/s12265-024-10584-w. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
2
Using machine learning to predict acute myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease in primary care cardiovascular patients.利用机器学习预测基层医疗心血管患者的急性心肌梗死和缺血性心脏病。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307099. eCollection 2024.
3
Revolutionizing Cardiology through Artificial Intelligence-Big Data from Proactive Prevention to Precise Diagnostics and Cutting-Edge Treatment-A Comprehensive Review of the Past 5 Years.

本文引用的文献

1
Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science.基于机器学习的科学中的漏洞与可重复性危机。
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Aug 4;4(9):100804. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100804. eCollection 2023 Sep 8.
2
Evaluation of Naples Score for Long-Term Mortality in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.基于直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行 Naples 评分对长期死亡率的评估。
Angiology. 2024 Sep;75(8):725-733. doi: 10.1177/00033197231170982. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
3
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Disease and Atrial Fibrillation.
通过人工智能革新心脏病学——从主动预防到精准诊断与前沿治疗的大数据——过去五年的全面综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 26;14(11):1103. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111103.
人工智能在冠状动脉疾病和心房颤动中的作用。
Balkan Med J. 2023 May 8;40(3):151-152. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2023.06042023. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
4
Presentation, care, and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI according to World Bank country income classification: the ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI Registry of the European Society of Cardiology.根据世界银行国家收入分类,非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的临床表现、治疗和结局:欧洲心脏病学会的 ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI 注册研究。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Sep 12;9(6):552-563. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad008.
5
In-hospital mortality risk stratification of Asian ACS patients with artificial intelligence algorithm.基于人工智能算法的亚洲 ACS 患者院内死亡风险分层。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 12;17(12):e0278944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278944. eCollection 2022.
6
In-hospital risk stratification algorithm of Asian elderly patients.亚洲老年住院患者的院内风险分层算法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 20;12(1):17592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18839-9.
7
Acute coronary syndrome prediction in emergency care: A machine learning approach.急危重症医学中急性冠脉综合征的预测:一种机器学习方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Oct;225:107080. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107080. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
8
Evaluation of Intermountain Risk Score for Short- and Long-Term Mortality in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.评估 Intermountain 风险评分对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者短期和长期死亡率的影响。
Angiology. 2023 Apr;74(4):357-364. doi: 10.1177/00033197221105753. Epub 2022 May 29.
9
Comparison of GRACE and TIMI risk scores in the prediction of in-hospital and long-term outcomes among East Asian non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.比较 GRACE 和 TIMI 风险评分在预测东亚非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院期间和长期结局中的作用。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02311-z.
10
Short- and long-term mortality prediction after an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Asians: A machine learning approach.亚洲人急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后的短期和长期死亡率预测:一种机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0254894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254894. eCollection 2021.